Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T02:56:10.945Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elevated troponin levels in previously healthy children: value of diagnostic modalities and the importance of a drug screen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

Poonam P. Thankavel ,
Arshid Mir  and
Claudio Ramaciotti
Poonam P. Thankavel*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, United States of America Children's Medical Center of Dallas, Dallas, Texas, United States of America
Arshid Mir
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, United States of America Children's Medical Center of Dallas, Dallas, Texas, United States of America
Claudio Ramaciotti
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, United States of America Children's Medical Center of Dallas, Dallas, Texas, United States of America
*
Correspondence to: Dr P. P. Thankavel, MD, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Children's Medical Center of Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, United States of America. Tel: +1 214 456-2333; Fax: +1 214 456-8066; E-mail: poonam.punjwani@childrens.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: Myocardial injury in previously healthy children is rare, with a wide range of aetiologies. It is increasingly being identified on the basis of elevated troponin levels during routine evaluation of cardiorespiratory symptoms. Establishing the aetiology remains challenging because of the lack of an accepted work-up algorithm. Our objective was to delineate the contribution of diagnostic modalities and troponin patterns towards the final diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective chart review of previously healthy patients admitted to the Pediatric Cardiology Service with myocardial injury was carried out. Data analysed included echocardiograms, electrocardiograms, cardiac catheterisations, magnetic resonance imaging, drug screen tests, troponin values, and final diagnosis. Results: A total of 32 patients were identified. The diagnoses were: myocarditis in 16 patients, vasospasm due to drug use in seven, myopericarditis in six, anomalous coronary artery origins in two, and Prinzmetal's angina in one patient. The electrocardiograms were abnormal in 27 of the 32 patients (84%), echocardiograms in 18 of the 32 patients (56%), cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in two of the four patients (50%), urine drug screen in five of the 25 patients (20%), and cardiac catheterisations in two of the 15 patients (13%). Conclusions: Myocarditis is the most common aetiology of myocardial injury in children. Clinical history remains the basic screening tool; drug screens help identify coronary vasospasms secondary to drug use (22% of our cohort). Patients with anomalous coronaries had exertional symptoms. Initial troponin levels and progression were not diagnostic or prognostic. Catheterisation is of limited value and did not change management. Magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium enhancement is probably the most useful test when initial evaluation is not diagnostic.

Keywords

Chest paintroponin elevation
Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 283 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Selbst, SM, Ruddy, RM, Clark, BJ, Henretig, FM, Santulli, T. Pediatric chest pain: a prospective study. Pediatrics 1988; 82: 319–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Ohman, E, Armstrong, P, Christenson, R, et al. Cardiac troponin T levels for risk stratification in acute myocardial ischemia. GUSTO IIA investigators. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1333–1341.Google Scholar
3. Kane, DA, Fulton, DR, Saleeb, S, Zhou, J, Lock, JE, Geggel, RL. Needles in hay: chest pain as the presenting symptom in children with serious underlying cardiac pathology. Congenit Heart Dis 2010; 5: 366–373.Google Scholar
4. Mir, A, Obafemi, A, Young, A, Kane, C. Myocardial infarction with use of the synthetic cannabinoid K2. Pediatrics 2011; 128: e1622–e1627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Basnet, S, Mander, G, Nicolas, R. Coronary vasospasm in an adolescent resulting from marijuana use. Pediatr Cardiol 2009; 30: 543–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Friedman, KG, Kane, DA, Rathod, RH, et al. Management of pediatric chest pain using a standardized assessment and management plan. Pediatrics 2011; 128: 239–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Brown, JL, Hirsh, DA, Mahle, WT. Use of troponin as a screen for chest pain in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Cardiol 2012; 33: 337–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Childs, H, Friedrich, M. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in myocarditis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2011; 54: 266–275.Google Scholar
9. Imazio, M, Trinchero, R. Myopericarditis: etiology, management, and prognosis. Int J Cardiol 2008; 127: 17–26.Google Scholar
10. Hirsch, R, Landt, Y, Porter, S, et al. Cardiac troponin I in pediatrics: normal values and potential use in the assessment of cardiac injury. J Pediatr 1997; 130: 872–877.Google Scholar
11. Kobayashi, D, Aggarwal, S, Kheiwa, A, Shah, N. Myopericarditis in children: elevated troponin I level does not predict outcome. Pediatr Cardiol 2012; 33: 1040–1045.Google Scholar
12. Mahrholdt, H, Goedecke, C, Wagner, A, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of human myocarditis: a comparison to histology and molecular pathology. Circulation 2004; 109: 1250–1258.Google Scholar
13. Gagliardi, MG, Polletta, B, Di Renzi, P. MRI for the diagnosis and follow-up of myocarditis. Circulation 1999; 99: 458–459.Google Scholar
14. Camastra, G, Cacciotti, L. Late enhancement detected by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in acute myocarditis mimicking myocardial infarction: location patterns and lack of correlation with systolic function. J Cardiovasc Med 2007; 8: 1029–1033.Google Scholar
15. Mittleman, MA, Lewis, RA, Maclure, M, et al. Triggering myocardial infarction by marijuana. Circulation 2001; 103: 2805–2809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Aryana, A, Williams, MA. Marijuana as a trigger of cardiovascular events: speculation or scientific certainty? Int J Cardiol 2007; 118: 141–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Thankavel, P, Brown, P, Carron, H, Ramaciotti, C. Imaging the coronary artery: is it really normal? How to avoid common echocardiographic pitfalls. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 5: 415–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. El Manyar, AA. Drug induced myocardial infarction secondary to coronary artery spasm in teenagers and young adults. J Postgrad Med 2006; 52: 51–56.Google Scholar
19. Nallusamy, S. Unstable angina clue to coronary artery muscle bridge: a case report. J Indian Med Assoc 2009; 107: 645–646.Google Scholar
20. Kim, SS, Jeong, MH, Kim, HK, et al. Long-term clinical course of patients with isolated myocardial bridge. Circ J 2010; 74: 538–543.Google Scholar
21. Martin, M, Romero Tarin, E, Luyando, LH, Rondan, J, Morales, C. Myocardial bridging: light in the tunnel. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 25: 555–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Xiang, DC, Gong, ZH, He, JX, Ruan, YJ, Xie, ZH. Characteristics of stress tests and symptoms in patients with myocardial bridge and coronary artery spasm. Coron Artery Dis 2009; 20: 27–31.Google Scholar
23. Laissy, J, Hyafil, F, Feldman, LJ, et al. Differentiating acute myocardial infarction from myocarditis: diagnostic value of early- and delayed-perfusion cardiac MR imaging. Radiology 2005; 237: 75–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed