Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:40:39.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IMPROVING THE EFFICIENCY OF USE OF SMALL AMOUNTS OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS FERTILISER ON SMALLHOLDER MAIZE IN CENTRAL MALAWI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2013

B. C. G. KAMANGA ,
S. R. WADDINGTON ,
A. M. WHITBREAD ,
C. J. M. ALMEKINDERS  and
K. E. GILLER
B. C. G. KAMANGA
Affiliation:
Knowledge, Technology and Innovation, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
S. R. WADDINGTON*
Affiliation:
Apartado Postal 4-205, Colonia Chapultepec, CP62451 Cuernavaca, México
A. M. WHITBREAD
Affiliation:
Crop Production Systems in the Tropics, Georg-August-Universität-Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
C. J. M. ALMEKINDERS
Affiliation:
Knowledge, Technology and Innovation, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
K. E. GILLER
Affiliation:
Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
Corresponding author. Email: srwaddington@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Mineral fertiliser is a scarce input for smallholder maize farmers in Malawi. A recent provision of small amounts of subsidised fertilisers by government programmes to farmers throughout Malawi has increased fertiliser access and raised maize production, but fertiliser management and yield responses frequently remain poor. To seek ways to use the fertiliser more efficiently, we analysed the effects of low rates of N (15 or 30 kg N ha−1) and P (9 kg P ha−1) fertiliser in combination with improved weed management on maize yields in experiments on 12 smallholder farms in Chisepo, central Malawi. Several indices of N and P use efficiency were computed from the above-ground crop components and nutrient contents. Maize yield simulations were conducted using long-term rainfall records in the APSIM crop-soil system model. NP fertiliser significantly (p < 0.001) raised maize grain yield from 0.65 to 1.5 t ha−1, and twice-weeding fertilised maize significantly (p < 0.001) raised maize yields by 0.4 t ha−1 compared with weeding once (0.9 t ha−1). The agronomic efficiency of applied fertiliser N (AEN) averaged 19.3 kg grain kg N−1 with one weeding but doubled to 38.7 kg with the additional weeding. The physiological efficiency of applied N (PEN) was 40.7 kg grain kg−1 N uptake. APSIM predicted that similar or larger maize yield responses to 15 or 30 kg N ha−1 can be expected in 8 out of 10 years in areas with similar rainfall patterns to Chisepo. A financial analysis showed that the application of these small amounts of fertiliser was economic even when fertiliser was purchased from the open market, provided the crop was adequately weeded. Participatory assessments helped farmers understand the increased efficiency of fertiliser use possible with additional weeding, although some farmers reported difficulty implementing this recommendation due to competing demands for labour. We conclude that to raise the productivity and sustainability of fertiliser support programmes in Malawi, initiatives should be introduced to help identify and educate farmers on the major drivers of productivity in their systems.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 229 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

African Fertiliser Summit (2006). Abuja, Nigeria, 9–13 June 2006. Available at: http://www.africanfertilisersummit.org.Google Scholar
Alwang, J. and Seigel, P. B. (1999). Labour shortages on small landholdings in Malawi: implications for policy reforms. World Development 27:1461–1475.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. M. and Ingram, J. S. I. (1993). Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of Methods. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Benson, T. D. (1997). Spatial and temporal variation in fertilizer recommendations for maize grown by smallholders in Malawi. In Maize Commodity Team Annual Report, 135–144. Lilongwe, Malawi: Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Agriculture Research, Chitedze Research Station.Google Scholar
Cassman, K. G., Dobermann, A. and Walters, D. T. (2002). Agroecosystems, nitrogen-use efficiency, and nitrogen management. Ambio 31:132–140.Google Scholar
Chisinga, B. (2008). Reclaiming Policy Space: Lessons from Malawi's 2005/2006 Fertilizer Subsidy Programme. Brighton, UK: Future Agricultures, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
Concern Universal. (2011). Conservation Agriculture Research Study. Blantyre, Malawi: Concern Universal Malawi.Google Scholar
de Wit, C. T. (1953). A physical theory on placement of fertilisers. Verslagen van landbouwkundige onderezoekingen 59 (4):71.Google Scholar
de Wit, C. T. (1992). Resource use efficiency in agriculture. Agricultural Systems 40:125–151.Google Scholar
Dimes, J., Muza, L., Malunga, G. and Snapp, S. (2004). Trade-offs between investments in nitrogen and weeding: on-farm experimentation and simulation analysis in Malawi and Zimbabwe. In Integrated Approaches to Higher Maize Productivity in the New Millennium. Proceedings of the 7th Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference, 5–11 February 2002, Nairobi, Kenya, 452–456 (Eds Friesen, D. K. and Palmer, A. F. E.). Nairobi, Kenya: CIMMYT and KARI.Google Scholar
Dobermann, A. R. (2005). Nitrogen Use Efficiency. State of the Art. Lincoln, USA: Agronomy and Horticulture Department, Agronomy Faculty Publications, University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
Dorward, A. and Chirwa, E. (2011). The Malawi agricultural input subsidy programme: 2005/06 to 2008/09. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 9 (1):232–247.Google Scholar
FAO. (2000). Fertilizers and Their Use: A Pocket Guide for Extension Officers, 4th edn. Rome, Italy and Paris, France: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and International Fertilizer Association.Google Scholar
Giller, K. E. (2001). Nitrogen Fixation in Tropical Cropping Systems, 2nd edn. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Giller, K. E., Rowe, E. C., de Ridder, N. and van Keulen, H. (2006). Resource use dynamics and interactions in the tropics: scaling up in space and time. Agricultural Systems 88:8–27.Google Scholar
Government of Malawi (2008). Enhancing Agricultural Input Use Efficiency in Malawi. A Research Report of the National Subsidy Programme Technical Support Workshop held in Lilongwe, 15–16 April 2008. Lilongwe, Malawi: Department of Planning, Ministry of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Heisey, P. W. and Mwangi, W. (1996). Fertilizer Use and Maize Production in Sub-Saharan Africa. Economics Program Working Paper 96-01. México, DF: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Kabambe, V. H. and Kumwenda, J. D. T. (1995). Weed management and nitrogen rate effects on maize grain yield and yield components in Malawi. In Proceedings of the Fourth Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference, held at Harare, Zimbabwe, 28 March–1 April 1994, 238–241 (Eds Jewell, D. C., Waddington, S. R., Ransom, J. K. and Pixley, K. V.). México, DF: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Kamanga, B. C. G. (2002). Farmer experimentation to assess the potential of legumes in maize-based cropping systems in Malawi. Risk Management Project Working Paper 02-02. México, DF: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Kamanga, B. C. G., Waddington, S. R., Robertson, M. J. and Giller, K. E. (2010). Risk analysis of maize–legume crop combinations with smallholder farmers varying in resource endowment in central Malawi. Experimental Agriculture 46:1–21.Google Scholar
Kanyama-Phiri, G., Snapp, S., Kamanga, B. and Wellard, K. (2000). Towards integrated soil fertility management in Malawi: incorporating participatory approaches in agricultural research. Managing African Soils No. 11. Nottingham, UK: Russell Press.Google Scholar
Kanyama-Phiri, G. Y., Wellard, K. and Snapp, S. S. (2008). Introduction: agriculture systems in context. In Agricultural Systems, Agroecology and Rural Innovations for Development, 1–27 (Eds Snapp, S. S. and Pound, B.). Burlington, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Keating, B. A., Carberry, P. S., Hammer, G. L., Probert, M. E., Robertson, M. J., Holzworth, D., Huth, N. I., Hargreaves, J. N. G., Meinke, H., Hochman, Z., McLean, G., Verburg, K., Snow, V., Dimes, J. P., Silburn, M., Wang, E., Brown, S., Bristow, K. L., Asseng, S., Chapman, S., McCown, R. L., Freebairn, D. M. and Smith, C. J. (2003). An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. European Journal of Agronomy 18:267–288.Google Scholar
Kumwenda, J. D. T., Waddington, S. R., Snapp, S. S., Jones, R. B. and Blackie, M. J. (1996). Soil fertility management research for maize cropping systems of smallholder farmers in southern Africa: a review. Natural Resources Group Paper 96-02. México, DF: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Mangisoni, J. H. (2000). Economic efficiency and investment potential in the smallholder crop sector in Malawi. International Journal of Social Economics 27:968–979.Google Scholar
Mushayi, P. T., Waddington, S. R. and Chiduza, C. (1999). Low efficiency of nitrogen use by maize on smallholder farms in sub-humid Zimbabwe. In Maize Production Technology for the Future: Challenges and Opportunities. Proceedings of the Sixth Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: CIMMYT and the Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization, 278–281.Google Scholar
Mwangi, W. (1996). Low use of fertilizers and low productivity in sub-Saharan Africa. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 47:135–147.Google Scholar
National Statistics Office (2009). CountryStat Malawi, Livestock Production. Zomba, Malawi, Available at: http://www.nso.malawi.net.Google Scholar
Ncube, B., Dimes, J. P., van Wijk, M. T., Twomlow, S. J. and Giller, K. E. (2009). Productivity and residual benefits of grain legumes to sorghum under semi-arid conditions in southwestern Zimbabwe: unravelling the effects of water and nitrogen using a simulation model. Field Crops Research 110:173–184.Google Scholar
Nhlane, W. G. (2001). Preliminary evaluation of flint maize hybrids in Malawi. In Agricultural Technologies for Sustainable Development in Malawi. Proceedings of the First Annual Scientific Conference held at Malawi Institute of Management (MIM), 6–10 November 2001, Lilongwe, Malawi, 24–27 (Eds Phiri, I. M. G., Saka, A. R. and Chilembwe, E. H. C.). Lilongwe, Malawi: Malawi Institute of Management.Google Scholar
Nziguheba, G., Merckx, R. and Palm, C. (2002). Soil phosphorus dynamics and maize responses to different rates of phosphorus fertiliser applied to an Acrisol in western Kenya. Plant and Soil 243:1–10.Google Scholar
Okalebo, J. R., Gathua, K. W. and Woomer, P. L. (1993). Laboratory Methods of Soil and Plant Analysis: A Working Manual. Nairobi, Kenya: TSBF.Google Scholar
Onken, A. B. and Wendt, C. W. (1989). Soil fertility management and water relationships. In Soil, Crop and Water Management Systems for Rainfed Agriculture in the Sudano–Sahelian Zone. Proceedings of an International Workshop, 11–16 January 1987. Niamey, Niger: ICRISAT Sahelian Center, 99–105.Google Scholar
Pircher, T., Almekinders, C. J. M. and Kamanga, B. C. G. (2013). Participatory trials and farmers’ social realities: understanding the adoption of legume technologies in a Malawian farmer community. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 11:252–263.Google Scholar
Robertson, M., Benson, T. and Shamudzarira, Z. (2000). Simulating nitrogen fertilizer response in low-input farming systems of Malawi. 1. Validation of crop response. Risk Management Working Paper Series 00/01. México, DF: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Robertson, M. J., Sakala, W., Benson, T. and Shamudzarira, Z. (2005). Simulating response of maize to previous velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens) crop and nitrogen fertiliser in Malawi. Field Crops Research 91:91–105.Google Scholar
Sanchez, P. A. (2002). Soil fertility and hunger in Africa. Science 295:2019–2020.Google Scholar
Sauer, J. and Tchale, H. (2009). The economics of soil fertility management in Malawi. Review of Agricultural Economics 31:535–560.Google Scholar
Shamudzarira, Z. and Robertson, M. J. (2002). Simulating the response of maize to nitrogen fertiliser in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Experimental Agriculture 38:79–96.Google Scholar
Shamudzarira, Z., Waddington, S., Robertson, M., Keating, B., Mushayi, P., Chiduza, C., Grace, P. and Carberry, P. (2000). Simulating N fertiliser response in low-input farming systems 1. Fertiliser recovery and crop response. 2. Effects of weed competition. Risk Management Working Paper Series 00/05. México, DF: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Snapp, S. S., Blackie, M. J., Gilbert, R. A., Bezner-Kerr, R. and Kanyama-Phiri, G. Y. (2010). Biodiversity can support a greener revolution in Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107:20840–20845.Google Scholar
Snapp, S. S., Borden, H. and Rohrbach, D. D. (2002). Improving nitrogen efficiency: lessons from Malawi and Michigan. In Optimizing Nitrogen Management in Food and Energy Production and Environmental Protection. Second International Nitrogen Conference, Potomac MD, USA, 42–48 (Eds Galloway, J., Cowling, E., Erisman, J. W., Wisniewski, J. and Jordan, C.). Lisse, The Netherlands: A.A. Balkema Publishers.Google Scholar
Tittonell, P., Zingore, S., van Wijk, M. T., Corbeels, M. and Giller, K. E. (2007). Nutrient use efficiencies and crop responses to N, P and manure applications in Zimbabwean soils: exploring management strategies across soil fertility gradients. Field Crops Research 100:348–368.Google Scholar
Wendt, J. W. (1993). Evaluation of Mehlich-3 Extraction for Upland Malawi Soils. Lilongwe, Malawi: Chitedze Research Station.Google Scholar
Wendt, J. W. and Jones, R. B. (1997). Evaluation of the efficacy of Malawi Tundulu phosphate rock for maize production. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 48:161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitbread, A. M., Jiri, O. and Maasdorp, B. (2004a). The effect of managing improved fallows of Mucuna pruriens on maize production and soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics in sub-humid Zimbabwe. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 69:59–71.Google Scholar
Whitbread, A., Mushayi, P. and Waddington, S. (2004b). Modelling the effect of phosphorus on maize production and nitrogen use efficiency on smallholder farms in sub-humid Zimbabwe. In New Directions for a Diverse Planet: Proceedings for the 4th International Crop Science Congress, Brisbane, Australia, 26 September–1 October 2004 (Eds Fischer, T., Turner, N., Angus, J., McIntyre, L., Robertson, M., Borrell, A. and Lloyd, D.). Gosford NSW, Australia: The Regional Institute Ltd. Available at: http://www.cropscience.org.au/icsc2004/.Google Scholar
Whiteside, M. (2000). Ganyu labour in Malawi and its implications for livelihood security interventions – an analysis of recent literature and implications for poverty alleviation. Agricultural Research and Extension Network, Network paper 99.Google Scholar