Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T22:09:51.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alignment of vorticity and rods with Lagrangian fluid stretching in turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2014

Rui Ni
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut 06459, USA Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
Nicholas T. Ouellette
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
Greg A. Voth*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut 06459, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: gvoth@wesleyan.edu

Abstract

Stretching in continuum mechanics is naturally described using the Cauchy–Green strain tensors. These tensors quantify the Lagrangian stretching experienced by a material element, and provide a powerful way to study processes in turbulent fluid flows that involve stretching such as vortex stretching and alignment of anisotropic particles. Analysing data from a simulation of isotropic turbulence, we observe preferential alignment between rods and vorticity. We show that this alignment arises because both of these quantities independently tend to align with the strongest Lagrangian stretching direction, as defined by the maximum eigenvector of the left Cauchy–Green strain tensor. In particular, rods approach almost perfect alignment with the strongest stretching direction. The alignment of vorticity with stretching is weaker, but still much stronger than previously observed alignment of vorticity with the eigenvectors of the Eulerian strain rate tensor. The alignment of strong vorticity is almost the same as that of rods that have experienced the same stretching.

Type
Rapids
Copyright
© 2014 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashurst, Wm. T., Kerstein, A. R., Kerr, R. M. & Gibson, C. H. 1987 Alignment of vorticity and scalar gradient with strain rate in simulated Navier–Stokes turbulence. Phys. Fluids 30, 23432353.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1952 The effect of homogeneous turbulence on material lines and surfaces. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 213, 349366.Google Scholar
Bec, J., Biferale, L., Boffetta, G., Cencini, M., Musacchio, S. & Toschi, F. 2006 Lyapunov exponents of heavy particles in turbulence. Phys. Fluids 18, 091702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzi, R., Biferale, L., Calzavarini, E., Lohse, D. & Toschi, F. 2009 Velocity-gradient statistics along particle trajectories in turbulent flows: The refined similarity hypothesis in the Lagrangian frame. Phys. Rev. E 80, 066318.Google Scholar
Chadwick, P. 1999 Continuum Mechanics: Concise Theory and Problems. Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Dresselhaus, E. & Tabor, M. 1991 The kinematics of stretching and alignment of material elements in general flow fields. J. Fluid Mech. 236, 415444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einarsson, J., Angilella, J. R. & Mehlig, B.2013 Orientational dynamics of weakly inertial axisymmetric particles in steady viscous flows. Preprint ArXiv:1307.2821.Google Scholar
Girimaji, S. S. & Pope, S. B. 1990 Material-element deformation in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 220, 427458.Google Scholar
Green, M. A., Rowley, C. W. & Haller, G. 2007 Detection of Lagrangian coherent structures in three-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 572, 111120.Google Scholar
Guala, M., Liberzon, A., Lüthi, B., Kinzelbach, W. & Tsinobar, A. 2006 Stretching and tilting of material lines in turbulence: The effect of strain and voriticity. Phys. Rev. E 73, 036303.Google Scholar
Gustavsson, K., Einarsson, J. & Mehlig, B. 2014 Tumbling of small axisymmetric particles in random and turbulent flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 014501.Google Scholar
Hamlington, P. E., Schumacher, J.  & Dahm, W. J. A. 2008 Direct assessment of vorticity alignment with local and nonlocal strain rates in turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids 20, 111703.Google Scholar
Huang, M.-J. 1996 Correlations of vorticity and material line elements with strain in decaying turbulence. Phys. Fluids 8, 22032214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IJzermans, R. H. A., Reeks, M. W., Meneguz, E., Picciotto, M. & Soldati, A. 2009 Measuring segregation of inertial particles in turbulence by a full Lagrangian approach. Phys. Rev. E 80, 015302(R).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeffery, G. B. 1922 The motion of ellipsoidal particles immersed in a viscous fluid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 102, 161179.Google Scholar
Jiménez, J. 1992 Kinematic alignment effects in turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids 4, 652654.Google Scholar
Li, Y. & Meneveau, C. 2007 Material deformation in a restricted euler model for turbulent flows: analytic solution and numerical tests. Phys. Fluids 19, 015104.Google Scholar
Lüthi, B., Tsinober, A & Kinzelbach, W. 2005 Lagrangian measurement of vorticity dynamics in turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 528, 87118.Google Scholar
Malvern, L. E. 1969 Introduction to the Mechanics of a Continuous Medium. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Meneveau, C. 2011 Lagrangian Dynamics and Models of the Velocity Gradient Tensor in Turbulent Flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 219245.Google Scholar
Monin, A. S. & Yaglom, A. M. 1975 Statistical Fluid Mechanics. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Parsa, S., Calzavarini, E., Toschi, F. & Voth, G. A. 2012 Rotation rate of rods in turbulent fluid flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (13), 134501.Google Scholar
Parsa, S., Guasto, J. S., Kishore, M., Ouellette, N. T., Gollub, J. P. & Voth, G. A. 2011 Rotation and alignment of rods in two-dimensional chaotic flow. Phys. Fluids 23, 043302.Google Scholar
Peacock, T. & Haller, T. 2013 Lagrangian coherent structures: The hidden skeleton of fluid flows. Phys. Today 66, 4148.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, R. T. & Yang, H. 1993 Global chaotic mixing on isentropic surfaces. J. Atmos. Sci. 50, 2480.Google Scholar
Pumir, A., Bodenschatz, E. & Xu, H. 2013 Tetrahedron deformation and alignment of perceived vorticity and strain in a turbulent flow. Phys. Fluids 25, 035101.Google Scholar
Pumir, A. & Wilkinson, M. 2011 Orientation statistics of small particles in turbulence. New J. Phys. 13, 093030.Google Scholar
Reeks, M. W.  & Meneguz, E. 2011 Statistical properties of particle segregation in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 686, 338351.Google Scholar
She, Z.-S., Jackson, E. & Orszag, S. A. 1990 Intermittent vortex structures in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Nature 344, 226228.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1938 Production and dissipation of vorticity in a turbulent fluid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 164, 1523.Google Scholar
Wan, M.2008 On the lagrangian study of the turbulent energy and circulation cascades. PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, M., Bezuglyy, V. & Mehlig, B. 2011 Emergent order in rheoscopic swirls. J. Fluid Mech. 667, 158187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, M. & Kennard, H. R. 2012 A model for alignment between microscopic rods and vorticity. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45, 455502.Google Scholar
Xu, H., Ouellette, N. T. & Bodenschatz, E. 2007 Curvature of Lagrangian Trajectories in Turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 050201.Google Scholar
Xu, H., Pumir, A. & Bodenschatz, E. 2011 The pirouette effect in turbulent flows. Nature Phys. 7, 709712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar