Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:41:10.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Persistent massive attractors of smooth maps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2012

D. VOLK*
Affiliation:
Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, Institute for Information Transmission Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia (email: denis.volk@sissa.it)

Abstract

For a smooth manifold of any dimension greater than one, we present an open set of smooth endomorphisms such that any of them has a transitive attractor with a non-empty interior. These maps are m-fold non-branched coverings, m≥3. The construction applies to any manifold of the form S1×M, where S1 is the standard circle and Mis an arbitrary manifold.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
©2012 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Abdenur, F., Bonatti, C. and Díaz, L. J.. Non-wandering sets with non-empty interiors. Nonlinearity 17(1) (2004), 175191.Google Scholar
[2]Alves, J. F. and Viana, M.. Statistical stability for robust classes of maps with non-uniform expansion. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 22(1) (2002), 132.Google Scholar
[3]Avila, A., Gouëzel, S. and Tsujii, M.. Smoothness of solenoidal attractors. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 15(1) (2006), 2135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Bowen, R.. Equilibrium States and the Ergodic Theory of Anosov Diffeomorphisms (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 470). Springer, Berlin, 1975.Google Scholar
[5]Brin, M.. Topological transitivity of a certain class of dynamical systems, and flows of frames on manifolds of negative curvature. Funkcional. Anal. i Priložen. 9(1) (1975), 919.Google Scholar
[6]de Melo, W. and van Strien, S.. One-Dimensional Dynamics. Springer, Berlin, 1993.Google Scholar
[7]Dobbs, N.. Hyperbolic dimension for interval maps. Nonlinearity 19(12) (2006), 2877.Google Scholar
[8]Fisher, T.. Hyperbolic sets with non-empty interior. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 15(2) (2006), 433446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Gorodetski, A.. Regularity of central leaves of partially hyperbolic sets and applications. Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat. 70(6) (2006), 1944.Google Scholar
[10]Gorodetski, A.. On stochastic sea of the standard map. Comm. Math. Phys. 309(1) (2012), 155192.Google Scholar
[11]Hirsch, M. W., Pugh, C. C. and Shub, M.. Invariant Manifolds (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 583). Springer, Berlin, 1977.Google Scholar
[12]Homburg, A. J.. Robustly minimal iterated function systems on compact manifolds generated by two diffeomorphisms. Preprint, 2011.Google Scholar
[13]Ilyashenko, Y.. Thick attractors of boundary preserving diffeomorphisms. Indag. Math. 22(3–4) (2011), 257314.Google Scholar
[14]Ilyashenko, Y., Kleptsyn, V. and Saltykov, P.. Openness of the set of boundary preserving maps of an annulus with intermingled attracting basins. J. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 3(2) (2008), 449463.Google Scholar
[15]Ilyashenko, Y. and Negut, A.. Invisible parts of attractors. Nonlinearity 23(5) (2010), 11991219.Google Scholar
[16]Ilyashenko, Y. and Negut, A.. Hölder properties of perturbed skew products and Fubini regained. Nonlinearity 25(8) (2012), 2377.Google Scholar
[17]McCluskey, H. and Manning, A.. Hausdorff dimension for horseshoes. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 3 (1983), 251260.Google Scholar
[18]Rams, M.. Absolute continuity of the SBR measure for non-linear fat baker maps. Nonlinearity 16(5) (2003), 16491655.Google Scholar
[19]Ruelle, D.. Differentiation of SRB states. Comm. Math. Phys. 187 (1997), 227241.Google Scholar
[20]Tsujii, M.. Fat solenoidal attractors. Nonlinearity 14(5) (2001), 10111027.Google Scholar
[21]Viana, M.. Multidimensional non-hyperbolic attractors. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 85(1) (1997), 6396.Google Scholar