Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:58:26.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assistance, Support and Monitoring? The Paradoxes of Mentoring Adults in the Criminal Justice System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2014

ANTHEA HUCKLESBY  and
EMMA WINCUP
ANTHEA HUCKLESBY
Affiliation:
Centre for Criminal Justice Studies, School of Law, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT email: A.L.Hucklesby@leeds.ac.uk
EMMA WINCUP
Affiliation:
Centre for Criminal Justice Studies, School of Law, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT email: E.L.Wincup@leeds.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mentoring has recently taken centre stage as one of the primary criminal justice ‘interventions’ to reduce reoffending, having grown in popularity over the past fifteen years. Its rapid growth has been driven by claims of success within and outside the criminal justice system, leading some to argue that it has been perceived as a silver bullet (Newburn and Shiner, 2005). This article challenges such claims on three fronts: first, mentoring is an ill-defined concept with weak theoretical foundations; second, the evidence base upon which claims of success are made is limited; and, third, transferring mentoring into the coercive and punitive environment of the criminal justice system results in a departure from the very principles and values which are the basis of its usefulness elsewhere. The article utilises the findings from three empirical criminal justice research projects to question claims of widespread and effective mentoring activity with defendants and offenders, suggesting instead that ‘interventions’ described as mentoring serve as a vehicle to extend the reach of the criminal justice system. At the end of the article, we suggest that desistance theory, specifically the Good Lives Model, provides a conceptual framework for taking mentoring in criminal justice forward.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 373 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BBC (2012), Speech by Chris Grayling on 20 November 2012, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20399401 (accessed 25/03/2013).Google Scholar
Boaz, A. and Pawson, R. (2005), ‘The perilous road from evidence to policy: five journeys compared’, Journal of Social Policy, 34: 175–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. and Ross, S. (2010a), ‘Mentoring, social capital and desistance: a study of women released from prison’, The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 43: 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. and Ross, S. (2010b), ‘Assisting and supporting women released from prisons: is mentoring the answer?’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 22: 217–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, R. and Maruna, S. (2006), ‘The kindness of prisoners: strengths-based resettlement in theory and in action’, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6: 83–106.Google Scholar
Cabinet Office, (2009), Volunteering across the Criminal Justice System : Baroness Neuberger's Review as the Government Volunteering Champion, London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
Calverley, A., Cole, B., Kaur, G., Lewis, S., Raynor, P., Sadeghi, S., Smith, D., Vanstone, M. and Wardak, A. (2004), Black and Asian Offenders on Probation, Home Office Research Study No. 277, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Carlen, P. (ed.) (2002), Women and Punishment: The Struggle for Justice, Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
CLINKS and Mentoring and Befriending Foundation (MBF) (2012), Supporting Offenders through Mentoring and Befriending, London: CLINKS.Google Scholar
Colley, H. (2002), Mentoring for Social Inclusion : A Critical Approach to Nurturing Mentoring Relationships, London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
Crawford, A. (2006), ‘Institutionalizing restorative youth justice in a cold, punitive climate’, in Aertsen, I., Daems, T. and Robert, L. (eds.), Institutionalizing Restorative Justice, Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Davies, K. and Gregory, M. (2010), ‘The price of targets: audit and evaluation in probation practice’, Probation Journal, 57: 400–14.Google Scholar
DuBois, D., Holloway, B., Valentine, J. and Cooper, H. (2002), ‘Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: a meta-analytic review’, American Journal of Community Psychology, 30: 157–97.Google Scholar
Farrall, S. (2002), Rethinking What Works with Offenders, Cullompton: Willian Publishing.Google Scholar
Farrall, S. (2004), ‘Social capital and offender re-integration: making probation desistance focussed’, in Maruna, S. and Immarigeon, R. (eds.), After Crime and Punishment: Ex-offender Reintegration and Desistance from Crime, Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Fletcher, D. R. and Batty, E. (2012), Offender Peer Interventions: What Do We Know? Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research: Sheffield Hallam University.Google Scholar
Gelsthorpe, L. and McIvor, G. (2007), ‘Difference and diversity in probation’, in Gelsthorpe, L. and Morgan, R. (eds.), Handbook of Probation, Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Gelsthorpe, L. and Sharpe, G. (2007), ‘Women and resettlement’, in Hucklesby, A. and Hagley-Dickinson, L. (eds.), Prisoner Resettlement: Policy and Practice, Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Hannah-Moffat, K. (2000), ‘Prisons that empower: neo-liberal governance in Canadian Women's prisons’, British Journal of Criminology, 40: 510–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannah-Moffat, K. (2002), ‘Creating choices: reflecting on choices’, in Carlen, P (ed.), Women and Punishment: The Struggle for Justice, Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Hucklesby, A. (2011), Bail Support Schemes for Adults, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Hucklesby, A. and Wincup, E. (2007), ‘Models of resettlement work with prisoners’, in Hucklesby, A. and Hagley-Dickinson, L. (eds.), Prisoner Resettlement: Policy and Practice, Cullompton: Willan Publishing, pp. 43–66.Google Scholar
Jolliffe, D. and Farrington, D. (2007), A Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Impact of Mentoring on Reoffending: A Summary, Home Office Online Report 11/07, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Jolliffe, D. and Farrington, D. (2008), The Influence of Mentoring on Reoffending, Stockholm, Swedish Council for Crime Prevention.Google Scholar
Lewis, S., Vennard, J., Maguire, M., Raynor, P., Vanstone, M., Raybould, S., and Rix, A. (2003), The Resettlement of Short-term Prisoners: An Evaluation of Seven Pathfinders, Occasional Paper No. 83, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Maruna, S. (2001), Making Good: How Ex-convicts Reform and Rebuild their Lives, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.Google Scholar
Maruna, S. and LeBel, T. (2003), ‘Welcome home? Examining the “re-entry court” concept from a strength-based perspective’, Western Criminology Review, 4: 91–107.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice (MoJ) (2008), Third Sector Strategy: Improving Policies and Securing Better Public Services through Effective Partnerships 2008–2011, London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice (MoJ) (2010), Breaking the Cycle: Effective Punishment, Rehabilitation and Sentencing of Offenders, Cmnd 7972, London: Stationary Office.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice (MoJ) (2011), Competition Strategy for Offender Services, London: Ministry of Justice, http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/publications/moj/2011/competition-strategy-offender-services.pdf.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice (MoJ) (2012), Punishment and Reform: Effective Probation Services, Cm 8333, London: Ministry of Justice, https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-communications/effective-probation-services.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice (MoJ)/National Offender Management Service (NOMS) (2008), Working with the Third Sector to Reduce Re-offending: Securing Effective Partnerships, London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
National Offender Management Service (NOMS) South West (2008), A Scoping Exercise of Offender Mentoring Schemes in the South West, London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
Nellis, M. (2004), ‘The tracking controversy: the roots of mentoring and electronic monitoring’, Youth Justice 4: 77–99.Google Scholar
Newburn, T. and Shiner, M. (2005), Dealing with Disaffection: Young People, Mentoring and Social Inclusion, Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Princes Trust, (2012), Evaluation Summary: Working One to One with Young Offenders, London: Princes Trust, http://www.icpr.org.uk/publications-team/volunteering,-peer-mentoring-and-the-criminal-justice-system.aspx (accessed 25/03/2013).Google Scholar
St James-Roberts, I., Greenlaw, G., Simon, A. and Harry, J. (2005), National Evaluation of the Youth Justice Board's Mentoring Schemes 2001–2004, London: Youth Justice Board.Google Scholar
Stevens, A. (2010), ‘Treatment sentences for drug users: contexts, mechanisms and outcomes’, Hucklesby, A. and Wincup, E. (eds.), Drug Interventions in Criminal Justice, Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Tarling, R., Davison, T., and Clarke, A. (2004), The National Evaluation of the Youth Justice Board's Mentoring Projects, London: Youth Justice Board.Google Scholar
Tolan, P., Henry, D., Schoeny, M. and Bass, A. (2008), Mentoring Interventions to Affect Juvenile Delinquency, Campbell Systematic Reviews, http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/lib/download/238/ (accessed 25/03/2013).Google Scholar
Trotter, C. (2006), Working with Involuntary Clients: A Guide to Practice, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Ward, T. (2002), ‘Good lives and the rehabilitation of offenders: promises and problems’, Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 7: 513–28.Google Scholar
Ward, T. and Brown, M. (2004), ‘The Good Lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation’, Psychology, Crime and Law, 10: 243–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, T. and Maruna, S. (2007), Rehabilitation: Beyond the Risk Paradigm, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wincup, E. and Hucklesby, A. (2007), ‘Researching and Evaluating Resettlement’, Hucklesby, A. and Hagley-Dickinson, L. (eds.), Prisoner Resettlement: Policy and Practice, Cullompton: Willan Publishing, pp. 121–43.Google Scholar
Wincup, E. (2013), Understanding Crime and Social Policy, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar