Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:53:36.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heritability of Motor Skill

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

L. R. T. Williams  and
J. B. Gross
L. R. T. Williams*
Affiliation:
School of Physical Education, University of Otago, New Zealand
J. B. Gross
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Education, University of Iowa, Ames, Iowa
*
University of Otago, Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A total of 22 monozygotic (MZ) and 41 dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs were given 72 trials on a stabilometer balance task over six days to study the extent of the genetic contribution to learning and performance of a gross motor skill. The expectations that interindividual differences would be less for the MZ than for the DZ twins and that intraindividual variability would not be different between the two groups were supported. Intraclass correlations were used to provide estimates for the proportions of total phenotypic variance accounted for by heritability (h2), systematic environmental variance (E2), and nonsystematic environmental effects (e2). Heritability was found to be low during the early stages of learning, before it increased to stabilize at approximately 65% for the remaining practice. E2 was highest during these early stages (24%), then declined quickly to stabilize at half that level. Error variance (e2) constituted the remaining variance. Learning profiles of the twin pairs were also analyzed, with a greater intrapair resemblance being found for the MZ twins. The present findings indicate that, for gross motor skills, there is considerable potential for influencing both the levels of performance (and learning) and the differences between individuals by judicious use of systematic environmental effects.

Keywords

BalanceIndividual differencesMotor learningMotor performanceMotor skillTwin correlationsAnalysis of variance
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , April 1980 , pp. 127 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1980

References

REFERENCES

1.Animons, RB (1947): Acquisition of motor skill: I. Quantitative analysis and theoretical formulation. Psychol Rev 54:263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Bachman, JC (1961): Specificity vs generality in learning and performing two large muscle motor tasks. Res Q Am Assoc Health Phys Educ Recreat 32:3–11.Google Scholar
3.Brody, D (1937): Twin resemblances in mechanical ability, with reference to the effects of practice on performance. Child Dev 8:207–216.Google Scholar
4.Burt, C (1966): The genetic determination of differences in intelligence: A study of monozygotic twins reared together and apart. Br J Psychol 57:137–153.Google Scholar
5.Cederlöf, R, Friberg, L, Jonsson, E, Kaij, L (1961): Studies on similarity diagnosis in twins with the aid of mailed questionnaires. Acta Genet Stat Med 1 1:338–362.Google Scholar
6.Gedda, L, Milani-Comparetti, M, Brenci, C (1960): A preliminary report on research made during the games of the XVIIth Olympiad, Rome. In Jokl, E, Simon, E (eds): “International Research in Sport and Physical Education.” Springfield, Illinois: Charles C Thomas, 1964.Google Scholar
7.Haggard, FA (1958): “Intraclass Correlation and the Analysis of Variance.” New York: Dryden.Google Scholar
8.Holt, SB (1952): Genetics of dermal ridges: Inheritance of total finger ridge count. Ann Eugen 17:140–161.Google Scholar
9.Holzinger, KJ (1929): The relative effect of nature and nurture influences on twin differences. J Educ Psychol 20:241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Jensen, AR (1967): Estimation of the limits of heritability of traits by comparison of monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 58:149–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Jensen, AR (1969): How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard Educ Rev 39:1–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Jinks, JL, Fulker, DW (1970): Comparison of the biometrical genetical, MAVA, and classical approaches to the analysis of human behavior. Psychol Bull 73:311–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Kirk, RE (1968): “Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences.” Belmont, California: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
14.Klissouras, V (1973): Prediction of potential performance with special reference to heredity. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 13:100–107.Google ScholarPubMed
15.Kovar, R (1976): Genetic analysis of motor performance. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 16:205–208.Google ScholarPubMed
16.McNemar, Q (1933): Twin resemblances in motor skills and the effect of practice thereon. J Genet Psychol 42:70–97.Google Scholar
17.Marisi, DQ (1977): Genetic and extragenetic variance in motor performance. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 26:197–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Newman, HH, Freeman, FN, Holzinger, KJ (1937): “Twins: A Study of Heredity and Environment.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
19.Scarr, S (1966): Genetic factors in activity motivation. Child Dev 37:663–673.Google Scholar
20.Shields, J (1962): “Monozygotic Twins Brought Up Apart and Brought Up Together.” London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
21.Sklad, M (1972): Similarity of movement in twins. Wychowani Fizyczne: Sport 3:119–141.Google Scholar
22.Sklad, M (1975): The genetic determination of the rate of learning of motor skills. Studies Phys Anthropol 1:3–19.Google Scholar
23.Vandenberg, SG (1962): The hereditary abilities study: Hereditary components in a psychological test battery. Am J Hum Genet 14:220–237.Google Scholar
24.Vandenberg, SG (1966): Contributions of twin research to psychology. Psychol Bull 66:327–352.Google Scholar
25.Welch, M, Henry, FM (1971): Individual differences in various parameters of motor learning. J Motor Behav 3:78–96.Google Scholar
26.Wilde, GJS (1970): An experimental study of mutual behavior imitation and person perception in MZ and DZ twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 19:273–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Willerman, L (1973): Activity level and hyperactivity in twins. Child Dev 44:288–293.Google Scholar
28.Williams, LRT, Hearfield, V (1973): Heritability of a gross motor balance task. Res Q Assoc Health Phys Educ Recreat 44:109–112.Google Scholar