Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T14:47:49.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fiscal federalism and American exceptionalism: why is there no federal equalisation system in the United States?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2014

Daniel Béland  and
André Lecours
Daniel Béland
Affiliation:
Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, University of Saskatchewan campus, Canada E-mail: daniel.beland@usask.ca
André Lecours
Affiliation:
School of Political Studies, University of Ottawa, Canada E-mail: a.lecours@videotron.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article addresses the absence of a federal equalisation programme in the United States, which is a significant aspect of “American exceptionalism”. Comparing the United States with Australia and Canada, we argue that three factors are relevant when accounting for this absence. On one hand, we turn to two societal factors to explain why there was never much political appetite for the creation of a stand-alone equalisation programme in the United States, namely the lack of a direct threat to the territorial integrity of the United States after 1865 and the comparative weakness of the idea of social citizenship in that country. On the other hand, our analysis shows that key institutional features of American political institutions, particularly strong bicameralism combined with the absence of formal party discipline, help illuminate why it would have been difficult to create an equalisation programme even if there had been some societal pressures to do so.

Keywords

AustraliaCanadaequalisationfiscal federalismpolitical institutionsUnited States
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , August 2014 , pp. 303 - 329
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amenta, E. (1998) Bold Relief: Institutional Politics and the Origins of Modern American Social Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, L. (2004) The Institutional Basis of Secessionist Politics: Federalism and Secession in the United States. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 34(2): 1–18.Google Scholar
Baker, R. A. (1988) The Senate of the United States: A Bicentennial History. Malabar: Robert E. Krieger Publishing.Google Scholar
Berry, C. R., Burden, B. C. and Howell, W. G. (2010) “The President and the Distribution of Federal Spending. American Political Science Review 104: 783–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D. and Hacker, J. S. (2004) Ideas, Private Institutions, and American Welfare State “Exceptionalism”: The Case of Health and Old-Age Insurance, 1915–1965. International Journal of Social Welfare 13(1): 42–54.Google Scholar
Béland, D. and Lecours, A. (2008) Nationalism and Social Policy: The Politics of Territorial Solidarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D. and Lecours, A. Forthcoming. Accommodation and the Politics of Fiscal Equalization in Multinational States: The Case of Canada. Nations & Nationalism.Google Scholar
Bertelli, A. M. and Grose, C. R. (2009) Secretaries of Pork? A New Theory of Distributive Public Policy. Journal of Politics 71(3): 926–945.Google Scholar
Bird, R. M. and Tarasov, A. (2004) Closing the Gap: Fiscal Imbalances and Intergovernmental Transfers in Developed Federations. Environment and Planning C 22(1): 77–102.Google Scholar
Boadway, R. and Shah, A. (eds.) (2007) Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: Principles and Practices. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Boadway, R. and Watts, R. L. (2004) Fiscal Federalism in Canada, the USA and Germany. Kingston: Queen’s University (Institute of Intergovernmental Relations).Google Scholar
Brodie, J. (2002) Citizenship and Solidarity: Reflections on the Canadian Way. Citizenship Studies 6: 377–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryden, P. E. (2009) The Obligations of Federalism: Ontario and the Origins of Equalization. In Anastakis D. and Bryden P. E. (eds) Framing Canadian Federalism: Historical Essays in Honour of John T. Saywell. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 75–94.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1999 [1967]) The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan, Vol. 4. Public Finance in Democratic Process: Fiscal Institutions and Individual Choice. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. C. and Rae, N. C. (eds.) (2001) The Contentious Senate. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. L. (2004) Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Coakley, J. (2003) The Territorial Management of Ethnic Conflict. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Commonwealth Grants Commission (CGC) (2012) Report on GST Revenue Sharing Relativities. Canberra: CGC.Google Scholar
Commonwealth Grants Commission (CGC) (2008) The Commonwealth Grants Commission: The Last 25 Years. Canberra: CGC.Google Scholar
Commonwealth Grants Commission (1995) Equality in Diversity. History of the Commonwealth Grants Commission, 2nd ed. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Services.Google Scholar
Conlan, T. (1998) New Federalism: Intergovernmental Reform from Nixon to Reagan. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Courchene, T. J. (1984) Equalization Payments: Past, Present and Future. Toronto: Ontario Economic Council.Google Scholar
Craven, G. (1986) Secession: The Ultimate States Right. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Department of Finance Canada (2012) Federal Support to Provinces and Territories. http://www.fin.gc.ca/fedprov/mtp-eng.asp (accessed 31 January 2014).Google Scholar
Deschouwer, K. (2009) The Politics of Belgium: Governing a Divided Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dommel, P. R. (1974) The Politics of Revenue Sharing. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Else-Mitchell, R. (1979) Fiscal Equality Between the States: The New Role of the Common wealth Grants Commission. Australian Journal of Public Administration 38(2): 157–167.Google Scholar
Erk, J. (2007) Explaining Federalism: State, Society and Congruence in Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany, and Switzerland. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Evans, D. (2004) Greasing the Wheels: Using Pork Barrel Projects to Build Majority Coalitions in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenna, A. (2007) The Malaise of Federalism: Comparative Reflections on Commonwealth-State Relations. The Australian Journal of Public Administration 66: 298–306.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, J. A. (1974) Pork Barrel Politics: Rivers and Harbors Legislation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, N. and Gordon, L. (1992) Contract Versus Charity: Why is There no Social Citizenship in the United States? Socialist Review 22: 45–68.Google Scholar
Frisch, S. A. (1998) The Politics of Pork: A Study of Congressional Appropriations Earmarks. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Galligan, B. (1995) A Federal Republic: Australia’s Constitutional System of Government. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilens, M. (2000) Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S. (2004) Privatizing Risk Without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review 98(2): 243–260.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Taylor, R. C. R. (1996) Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies 44(5): 936–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, W. W. (1968) A Sympathetic Reappraisal of Revenue Sharing. In Perloff H.S. and Nathan R. P. (eds.) Revenue Sharing and the City. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 3–38.Google Scholar
Hovey, H. A. (1999) Can the States Afford Devolution? The Fiscal Implications of Shifting Federal Responsibilities to State and Local Governments. New York: Century Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Howard, C. (2006) The Welfare State Nobody Knows: Debunking Myths About U.S. Social Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, C. (1997) The Hidden Welfare State: Tax Expenditures and Social Policy in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hueglin, T. O. and Fenna, A. (2006) Comparative Federalism. Peterborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Immergut, E. L. (1992) Health Politics: Interest and Institutions in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kenyon, D. A. and Kincaid, John (1996) Fiscal Federalism in the United States: The Reluctance to Equalize Jurisdiction. In Pommerehne W. W. and Ress G. (eds.) Finanzverfassung im Spannungsfeld zwischen Zentralstaat und Gliedstaaten. Baden-Baden: NOMOS, 34–56.Google Scholar
Lazarus, J., Glas, J. and Barbieri, K. T. (2012) Earmarks and Elections in the U.S. House of Representatives. Congress and the Presidency 39(3): 254–269.Google Scholar
Lecours, A. (ed.) (2005) New Institutionalism: Theory and Analysis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecours, A. and Béland, D. (2010) Federalism and Fiscal Policy: The Politics of Equalization in Canada. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 40(4): 569–596.Google Scholar
Lecours, A. and McEwen, N. (2008) Voice or Recognition? Comparing Strategies for Accommodating Territorial Minorities in Multinational States. Journal of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 46(2): 220–243.Google Scholar
Lee, F. E. and Oppenheimer, B. (1999) Sizing Up the Senate: The Unequal Consequences of Equal Representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, R. C. (1998) Shifting the Color Line: Race and the American Welfare State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1990) Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada . New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. and Marks, G. (2000) It Didn't Happen Here: Why Socialism Failed in the United States. New York: Norton & Co. Google Scholar
Lowi, T. J. (1984) Why is There no Socialism in the United States? A Federal Analysis. International Political Science Review 5(4): 369–380.Google Scholar
Lubove, R. (1968) The Struggle for Social Security, 1900–1935. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Macintyre, S. (2009) A Concise History of Australia, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mackay, R. (1963) The Unreformed Senate. Toronto: McClleland and Stewart.Google Scholar
MacNevin, A. S. (2004) Canadian Federal-Provincial Equalization Regime: An Assessment. Toronto: Canada Tax Foundation.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. and Goertz, G. (2004) The Possibility Principle: Choosing Negative Cases in Comparative Research Source. The American Political Science Review 98(4): 653–669.Google Scholar
Marchildon, G. P. (2005) Understanding Equalization: Is it Possible? Canadian Public Administration 48(3): 420–428.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H. (ed.) (1964 [1950]) Citizenship and Social Class. In Class, Citizenship and Development. Garden City: Doubleday, 65–122.Google Scholar
Martin, I. W., Mehrotra, A. K. and Prasad, M. (2009) The New Fiscal Sociology: Taxation in Comparative and Historical Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R. J. (1971) Financing Small States in Australian Federalism. Melbourne: OUP.Google Scholar
Mayhew, D. R. (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McGarry, J. and O’Leary, B. (2007) Federation as a Method of Ethnic Conflict Regulation. In Burgess M. and Pindeer J. (eds.) Multinational Federations. London: Routledge, 180–211.Google Scholar
Milne, D. (1998) Equalization and the Politics of Restraint. In Boadway R. W. and Hobson P. A. R. (ed.) Equalization: Its Contribution to Canada’s Fiscal and Economic Progress. Kingston: John Deutsch Institute for the Study of Economic Policy, 175–203.Google Scholar
Morris, A. (2002) The Commonwealth Grants Commission and Horizontal Fiscal Equalization. The Australian Economic Review 35(3): 318–324.Google Scholar
Myles, J. (1997) Neither Rights Nor Contracts: The New Means-Testing in the U.S. Aging Policy. In Hudson R. B. (ed.) The Future of Age-Based Public Policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 46–55.Google Scholar
Nahan, M. (2005) The Death of Federalism? Melbourne: Institute of Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Nordyke, S. (2008) Who Gets What and Why: An Analysis of State Level Funding in the Department of Homeland Security. PhD Dissertation in Public Policy, Indiana University, Indiana.Google Scholar
Obinger, H., Leibfried, S. and Castles, F. G. (eds.) (2005) Federalism and the Welfare State: New World and European Experiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Orren, K. and Skowronek, S. (2004) The Search for American Political Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Padamsee, T. (2009) Culture in Connection: Re-Contextualizing Ideational Processes in the Analysis of Policy Development. Social Politics 16(4): 413–445.Google Scholar
Parsons, C. (2007) How to Map Arguments in Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (2000) Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 94(2): 251–267.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2004) Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. and Teune, H. (1970) The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Inter-Science.Google Scholar
Quadagno, J. (2005) One Nation Uninsured: Why The U.S. Has No National Health Insurance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quadagno, J. (1994) The Color of Welfare: How Racism Undermined the War on Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadagno, J. (1988) The Transformation of Old Age Security: Class and Politics in the American Welfare State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reagan, M. D. and Sanzone, J. G. (1981) The New Federalism, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rice, J. J. and Prince, M. J. (2000) Changing Politics of Canadian Social Policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Rocca, M. S. and Gordon, S. B. (2013) Earmarks as a Means and an End: The Link Between Earmarks and Campaign Contributions in the U.S. House of Representatives. Journal of Politics 75(1): 241–253.Google Scholar
Shaver, S. (2002) Australian Welfare Reform: From Citizenship to Supervision. Social Policy & Administration 36(4): 331–345.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1992) Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smiley, D. V. (1987) The Federal Condition in Canada. Toronto: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Smith, J. (2009) The Democratic Dilemma: Reforming the Canadian Senate. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Sombart, W. (1976 [1906]) Why is There no Socialism in the United States? New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Soss, J., Fording, R. C. and Schram, S. F. (2011) Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, K. J. (2009) Rich States, Poor States: Assessing the Design and Effect of a U.S. Fiscal Equalization Regime. Tax Law Review 63: 957–1008.Google Scholar
Steensland, B. (2008) The Failed Welfare Revolution: America’s Struggle Over Guaranteed Income Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, R. M. and Bickers, K. N. (1997) Perpetuating the Pork Barrel: Policy Subsystems and American Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steinmo, S., Thelen, K. and Longstreth, F. (1992) Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, A. C. (ed.) (2001) Toward a New Comparative Analysis of Democracy and Federalism: “Demos Constraining” and “Demos Enabling” Federations. In Arguing Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 315–361.Google Scholar
Swenden, W. (2004) Federalism and Second Chambers: Regional Representation in Parliamentary Federations: The Australian Senate and German Bundesrat Compared. Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Théret, B. (1999) Regionalism and Federalism: A Comparative Analysis of the Regulation of Economic Tensions Between Regions by Canadian and American Federal Intergovernmental Transfer Programmes. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 23(3): 479–512.Google Scholar
Wallace, J. J. (2003) Ideology vs. Reality: The Myth of Equal Opportunity in a Color Blind Society. Akron Law Review 36: 693–716.Google Scholar
Wallin, B. A. (1998) From Revenue Sharing to Deficit Sharing: General Revenue Sharing and Cities. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, R. L. (2008) Comparing Federal Systems, 3rd ed. Kingston: Institute of Intergovernmental Relations.Google Scholar
Watts, R. L. (1999) Equalization in Commonwealth Federations. Regional and Federal Studies 13: 111–129.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. K. (1986) The Politics of Blame Avoidance. Journal of Public Policy 6(4): 371–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, R. K. and Rockman, B. A. (1993) Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Williamson, R. S. (1990) Reagan’s Federalism: His Efforts to Decentralize Government. New York: University Press of America.Google Scholar