Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:33:41.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Salivary gland pathology in the paediatric population: implications for management and presentation of a rare case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2014

L Jablenska*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, Luton
A Trinidade
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, James Paget University Hospital, Great Yarmouth, UK
V Meranagri
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, Luton
P Kothari
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, Luton
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Liliana Jablenska, Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, Lewsey Rd, Luton LU4 0DZ, UK E-mail: ljablenska@doctors.org.uk

Abstract

Introduction:

Salivary gland pathology in the paediatric population is rare and can present management challenges regarding both investigation and treatment.

Method:

Case report and review of available literature.

Results:

A seven-year-old, fit, well girl presented with a two-month history of a painless mass over the left parotid area. Ultrasonography confirmed the presence of a well-defined, 1.5 × 2 cm, predominantly solid lesion with minor internal cystic spaces arising from the superficial part of the gland. Magnetic resonance imaging showed no invasion of the deep lobe or skeletal erosion. Superficial parotidectomy was performed via a facelift incision. Histopathology confirmed a diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma. Review of the literature emphasised important differences in managing this pathology in the paediatric population when compared with adults.

Conclusion:

We present the youngest reported case of a pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland, detail its management, and discuss the general approach to parotid pathology management in the paediatric population.

Type
Clinical Records
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented at the Third International Congress on Salivary Gland Diseases, 22–23 March 2012, Geneva, Switzerland, and at the Semon Club, 15 May 2012, London, UK.

References

1Sultan, I, Rodriguez-Galindo, C, Al-Sharabati, S, Guzzo, M, Casanova, M, Ferrari, A. Salivary gland carcinomas in children and adolescents: a population-based study, with comparison to adult cases. Head Neck 2011;33:1476–81Google Scholar
2Rodriguez, KH, Vargas, S, Robson, C, Perez-Atayde, A, Shamberger, R, McGill, TJ et al. Pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007;71:1717–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Malone, B, Baker, SR. Benign pleomorphic adenomas in children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1984;93:210–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Meiling Xie, C, Kubba, H. Parotidectomy in children: indications and complications. J Laryngol Otol 2010;124:1289–93Google Scholar
5Bassu, F, Parrilla, C, Rizzo, D, Almadori, G, Paludetti, G, Galli, J. Clinical approach and treatment of benign and malignant parotid masses, personal experience. Acta Otolaryngol Ital 2011;31:135–43Google Scholar
6Sodhi, KS, Bartlett, M, Prabhu, NK. Role of high resolution ultrasound in parotid lesions in children. Int J Paediatr Otolaryngol 2011;75:1353–8Google Scholar
7Lohuis, PJ, Tan, ML, Bonte, K, Van Den Brekel, MW, Balm, AJ, Vermeersch, HB. Superficial parotidectomy via facelift incision. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2009;118:276–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Lee, SY, Koh, YW, Kim, BG, Hong, HJ, Jeong, JH, Choi, EC. The extended indication of parotidectomy using modified facelift incision in benign lesions: retrospective analysis. World J Surg 2011;35:2228–37Google Scholar