Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:38:11.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time-out as a Means of Shaping Whole-task Completion as a Precursor to Establishing Rule-following Behaviour with a Severely Noncompliant Preschool Child

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Wendy K. Pailthorpe  and
Alan Ralph
Wendy K. Pailthorpe
Affiliation:
Murdoch University
Alan Ralph*
Affiliation:
James Cook University
*
Department of Psychology and Sociology, James Cook University, Townsville QLD 4819, Australia. E-mail: Alan.Ralph@jcu.edu.au
Get access

Extract

A preschool girl who displayed severe noncompliant and disruptive behaviour was taught to successfully complete a card-matching task, to verbalise the task requirements, and to report successful task completion by means of a time-out procedure in combination with correspondence training. In order to bring about this success, time out was successively introduced for three preparatory behaviours (sitting still, keeping hands down, and looking at the task materials), for completion of simple tasks interspersed between trials of card-matching, and for stating the card-matching task requirement. The conditions for implementing time-out were gradually changed from allowing two chances to comply (implemented only after a second request was not complied with) to allowing only one chance (implemented after the first request was not complied with). This changing criterion time-out procedure was used in place of the more commonly used, but possibly more lengthy procedure whereby tasks not performed adequately are broken down into smaller steps and successive approximations are contingently shaped. The success of the time-out procedure is discussed as a potential means of conducting powerful early interventions with young children at risk for diagnoses of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder or similar disorders where a failure to correct severe behaviour problems observed at an early age is predictive of the need for more intrusive and expensive interventions later.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 50 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abikoff, H. (1985). Efficacy of cognitive training interventions in hyperactive children: A critical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 5, 479–512.Google Scholar
Abikoff, H. & Gittelman, R. (1985). Hyperactive children treated with stimulants. Archives of General Psychiatry, 42, 953–961.Google Scholar
Achenbach, T.M. (1991). Manuals for Child Behavior Checklist and Teachers' Report Form. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Azrin, N.H., Besalel, V.A., Jamner, J.P., & Caputo, J.N. (1988). Comparative study of behavioral methods of treating severe self-injury. Behavioral Residential Treatment, 3, 119–150.Google Scholar
Barkley, R.A. (1987). Defiant children: A clinician's manual for parent training. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Barkley, R.A. (1990). Attention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Barkley, R.A. (1995). A closer look at the DSM-IV criteria for ADHD: Some unsolved issues. ADHD Report, 3, 1–5.Google Scholar
Birnbrauer, J.S., & Leach, D.J. (1993). The Murdoch Early Intervention Program after two years. Behaviour Change, 10, 63–74.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, P., & Reid, J.B. (1987). Parent observation and report of child symptoms. Behavioral Assessment, 9, 97–109.Google Scholar
Danforth, J.S. (1996). The behavior management flow chart. Unpublished manuscript, Eastern Connecticut State University.Google Scholar
Draeger, S., Prior, M., & Sanson, A. (1986). Visual and auditory attention performance in hyperactive children: Competence or compliance. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 14, 411–424.Google Scholar
Dumas, J.E., & Lechowicz, J.G. (1989). When do non-complaint children comply? Implications for family therapy. Child and Family Behaviour Therapy, 11, 21–38.Google Scholar
Eyberg, S.M., & Robinson, E.A. (1983). Conduct problem behavior: Standardization of a behavior rating scale with adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 12, 347–354.Google Scholar
Guerin, B. (1994). Analyzing social behaviour: Behavior analysis and the social sciences. Reno: Context.Google Scholar
Handen, B.L., Parrish, J.M., McClung, T.J., Kerwin, M.E., & Evans, L.D. (1992). Using guided compliance versus time out to promote child compliance: A preliminary comparative analysis in an analogue context. Research in Development Disabilities, 13, 157–170.Google Scholar
Hayes, L.J., Thompson, S., & Hayes, S.C. (1989). Stimulus equivalence and rule following. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 275–291.Google Scholar
Israel, A.C. (1978). Some thoughts on correspondence between saying and doing. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 271–276.Google Scholar
Karoly, P., & Dirks, M.J. (1977). Developing self-control in preschool children through correspondence training. Behavior Therapy, 8, 398–405.Google Scholar
Kazdin, A.E. (1994). Behavior modification in applied settings. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole.Google Scholar
Leitenberg, H. (1965). Is timeout from positive reinforcement an aversive event?: A review of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 428–441.Google Scholar
Lovaas, O.I. (1981). Teaching developmentally disabled children: The ME book. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Lovaas, O.I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 3–9.Google Scholar
Malott, R.W. (1989). The achievement of evasive goals: Control by rules describing contingencies that are not direct acting. In Hayes, S.C. (Ed.), Rule-governed behaviour: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 269–319). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Nelson, C.M., & Rutherford, R.B. (1983, 02). Timeout revisited: Guidelines for its use in special education. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 56–67.Google Scholar
Paniagua, F.A. (1987). Management of hyperactive children through correspondence training procedures: A preliminary study. Behavioral Residential Treatment, 2, 1–23.Google Scholar
Paniagua, F.A. (1992). Verbal-nonverbal correspondence training with ADHD children. Behavior Modification, 16, 226–252.Google Scholar
Paniagua, F.A., & Black, S.A. (1990). Management and prevention of hyperactivity and conduct disorders in 8–10 year old boys through correspondence training procedures. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 12, 23–56.Google Scholar
Paniagua, F.A., & Black, S.A. (1992). Correspondence training and observational learning in the management of hyperactive children: A preliminary study. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 14, 1–19.Google Scholar
Paniagua, F.A., Morrison, P.B., & Black, S.A. (1990). Management of a hyperactive-conduct disordered child through correspondence training: A preliminary study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 21, 61–68.Google Scholar
Paniagua, F.A., Pumariega, A.J., & Black, S.A. (1988). Clinical effects of correspondence training in the management of hyperactive children. Behavioral Residential Treatment, 3, 19–40.Google Scholar
Patterson, G., & Forgatch, M. (1987). Parents and adolescents living together: Part 1. The basics. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
Poppen, R.L. (1989). Some clinical implications of rule-governed behavior. In Hayes, S.C. (Ed.), Rule-governed behaviour: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 325–384). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Roberts, M.W. (1988). Enforcing chair timeouts with room timeouts. Behaviour Modification, 12, 353–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanders, M.R. (1992). Every parent: A positive guide to children's behavior. Sydney: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Vaughan, M.E. (1989). Rule-governed behavior in behavior analysis: A theoretical and experimental history. In Hayes, S.C. (Ed.), Rule-governed behaviour: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 97–115). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar