Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:42:00.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subalternists Scrutinized - Vivek Chibber, Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital (London/New york, Verso, 2013)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2014

Michael Levien
Michael Levien*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore [levien@jhu.edu]
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , December 2013 , pp. 485 - 497
Copyright
Copyright © A.E.S. 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Guha Ranajit, 1982. Subaltern Studies 1: Writings on South Asian Society and History, Vol. 1. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

2 Guha Ranajit, 1997. Dominance Without Hegemony: History and Power in Colonial India. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

3 Chatterjee Partha, 2013. “Subaltern Studies and Capital.” Economic and Political Weekly 48(37): 69-75.

4 Riley Dylan J. and Manali Desai, 2007. “The Passive Revolutionary Route to the Modern World: Italy and India in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 49(4): 815-847.

5 Moore Barrington, 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.

6 Chakrabarty Dipesh, 1989. Rethinking Working Class History: Bengal 1890-1940. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

7 Chakrabarty Dipesh, 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

8 Sivaramakrishnan K., 1995. “Situating the Subaltern: History and Anthropology in the Subaltern Studies Project.” Journal of Historical Sociology 8(4): 395-492.

9 Ludden David, 2001. “Subalterns and Others in the Agrarian History of South Asia”, in SCOTT James C. and Nina BHATT (eds.), Agrarian Studies: Synthetic Work at the Cutting Edge, New Haven, Yale University Press.

10 Patnaik Utsa, 1976. “Class Differentiation Within the Peasantry: An Approach to Analysis of Indian Agriculture.” Economic and Political Weekly 11(39): A82-A101.

11 Bagchi Amiya Kumar, 1990. “Working Class Consciousness.” Economic and Political Weekly 25(30): PE54-PE60.

12 Chatterjee Partha, 1984. Bengal, 1920-1947: The Land Question. Calcutta: K.P. Bagchi.

13 Chatterjee Partha, 1986. “The Colonial State and Peasant Resistance in Bengal, 1920-1947.” Past and Present 110: 169-204.

14 Guha Ranajit, 1999. Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India. Durham: Duke University Press.

15 Hobsbawm E.J., 1959. Primitive Rebels. New York: Norton.

16 Scott James, 1977. “Peasant Revolutions: A Dismal Science.” Comparative Politics 9(2): 231-248.

17 Lakatos Imre, 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

18 Burawoy Michael, 1989. “Two Methods in Search of Science: Skocpol Versus Trotsky.” Theory and Society 18: 759-805.