Primary Health Care Research & Development

Development

Health equity audits in general practice: a strategy to reduce health inequalities

Ellena Badricka1, Sally Hulla2, Rohini Mathura3 c1, Shamin Shajahana4, Kambiz Boomlaa5, Stephen Bremnera6 and John Robsona7

a1 Research Fellow, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

a2 Reader, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

a3 Research Fellow, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

a4 Programme Manager, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

a5 Senior Clinical Lecturer, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

a6 Statistician, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

a7 Reader, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Abstract

Background This quality improvement project was set in Tower Hamlets, east London, with the aim of reducing health inequalities by ethnicity, age and gender in the management of three common chronic diseases.

Methods Routinely collected clinical data were extracted from practice computer systems using Morbidity Information Query and Export Syntax (MIQUEST) and Egton Medical Information Systems (EMIS) Web, between 2007 and 2010. Health equity audits for 38 practices in Tower Hamlets primary care trust (PCT) were constructed to cover key process and outcome measures for each of the three major chronic diseases: coronary heart disease (CHD), type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The equity audit was disseminated to practices along with facilitation sessions.

Results We show evidence of baseline inequalities in each condition across the three east London PCTs. The intervention tracked four key indicators (cholesterol levels in CHD, blood pressure and haemoglobin A1c levels in diabetes and % smoking in COPD). Performance for physician-driven interventions improved, but smoking rates remained static. All ethnic groups showed improvement, but there was no evidence of a reduction in differences between ethnic groups. Reductions in gender and age group differences were noted in diabetes and CHD.

Conclusions Using routine clinical data, it is possible to develop practice-level health equity reports. These can unmask previously hidden inequalities between groups, and promote discussion with practice teams to stimulate strategies for improvements in performance. Steady improvements in chronic disease management were observed, however, systematic differences between ethnic groups remain. We are not able to attribute observed changes to the audits. These reports illustrate the importance of collecting ethnicity data at practice level. Tools such as this audit can be adapted to monitor inequalities in primary care settings.

(Received December 23 2011)

(Revised May 06 2012)

(Accepted September 21 2012)

(Online publication February 04 2013)

Key words

  • audit;
  • ethnicity;
  • general practice;
  • inequality

Correspondence

c1 Correspondence to: Rohini Mathur, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Yvonne Carter Building, Ashfield Street, London E1, UK. Email: r.mathur@qmul.ac.uk

0Comments
Related Content