Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T23:15:48.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Utile forms: power and knowledge in small war

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2013

Abstract

This article introduces the concept of ‘utile forms’ and analyses the effects of these forms in imperial rule and contemporary counterinsurgency. Utile forms are media that enable bureaucracies to disseminate specialised knowledges to officials operating in the field. Examples include smart cards, field manuals, and handheld biometric devices. We argue that utile forms have significant social and political effects irrespective of the ‘truth value’ of the knowledge they contain. We analyse these effects in terms of world-ordering and world-making properties: utile forms both embody a particular worldview or ideology (world-ordering) and they facilitate official attempts to remake the world in accordance with this vision (world-making). We draw on examples of utile forms from British India and more recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. The article concludes by reflecting on the relations between truth, knowledge, and power in times of war and imperialism.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (New York: Vintage Books, 1979), pp. 26–7, 194Google Scholar.

2 Miyoshi, Masao and Harootunian, Harry D., Learning Places: The Afterlives of Area Studies (Durham: Duke University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cumings, Bruce, ‘Boundary Displacement: The State, the Foundations, and International and Area Studies During and after the Cold War’, Parallax Visions: Making Sense of American-East Asian Relations at the End of the Century (Durham: Duke University Press, 1999)Google Scholar; Chomsky, Noam, The Cold War & the University: Toward an Intellectual History of the Postwar Years (New York: New Press, 1997)Google Scholar.

3 This is a major theme in the work of Hans Morgenthau, among others. Meyers, Robert J., ‘Hans J. Morgenthau: On Speaking Truth to Power’, Society, 29:2 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Foucault, Michel and Gordon, Colin, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977 (New York: Pantheon Books, 1980)Google Scholar. For related work in security studies, see Oren, Ido, Our Enemies and Us: America's Rivalries and the Making of Political Science (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003)Google Scholar; Ansorge, Josef Teboho, ‘Spirits of War: A Field Manual’, International Political Sociology, 4:4 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barkawi, Tarak and Laffey, Mark, ‘The Postcolonial Moment in Security Studies’, Review of International Studies, 32:2 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Alker, Hayward R. and Biersteker, Thomas J., ‘The Dialectics of World Order: Notes for a Future Archaeologist of International Savoir Faire’, International Studies Quarterly, 28:2 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 McLuhan, Marshall, Understanding Media (New York: Routledge, 2008)Google Scholar; Ong, Walter J, Orality and Literacy: Technologizing the Word (Oxford: Routledge, 2002)Google Scholar.

6 Tufte, Edward R., The Cognitive Style of Powerpoint: Pitching out Corrupts Within (Cheshire, Conn.: Graphics Press, 2006)Google Scholar; Hammes, T. X., ‘Dumb-Dumb Bullets’, Armed Forces Journal (July 2009)Google Scholar.

7 McFate, Montgomery and Jackson, Andrea, ‘An Organizational Solution for DoD's Cultural Knowledge Needs’, Military Review, 85:4 (July–August 2005), p. 20Google Scholar.

8 AAA Commission on the Engagement of Anthropology with the US Security and Intelligence Communities (CEAUSSIC), ‘Final Report on the Army's Human Terrain System Proof of Concept Program’ (2009), p. 30.

9 Price, David H., ‘Anthropology as Lamppost? A Comment on the Counterinsurgency Field Manual’, Anthropology Today, 23:6 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Gregory, Derek, ‘“The Rush to the Intimate” Counterinsurgency and the Cultural Turn’, Radical Philosophy, 150 (2008), p. 4Google Scholar; Gusterson, Hugh, ‘The Cultural turn in the War on Terror’, in Kelly, Johnet al. (eds), Anthropology and Global Counterinsurgency (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2010)Google Scholar.

10 (CEAUSSIC), ‘Final Report’, p. 3.

11 Price, David H, ‘Faking Scholarship’, in Network of Concerned Anthropologists (ed.), The Counter-Counterinsurgency Manual: Or Notes on Demilitarizing American Society (Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, 2009), p. 64Google Scholar.

12 Marshall Sahlins, ‘Preface’, ibid., pp. ii–iii. It is important to note that few holders of academic posts have actually served on HTTs.

13 Feldman, Greg, ‘Radical or Reactionary? The Old Wine in the Counterinsurgency Field Manual's New Flask’, in Network of Concerned Anthropologists (ed.), The Counter Counterinsurgency Manual, p. 90Google Scholar.

14 John Nagl, ‘Desperate People with Limited Skills’, Small Wars Blog, {http://smallwarsjournal.com/blog/2007/11/desperate-people-with-limited/}.

15 Price, David, Weaponizing Anthropology: Social Science in Service of the Militarized State (Oakland, CA: AK Press, 2011)Google Scholar.

16 Sahlins, ‘Preface’, p. iv. See also Price, ‘Faking Scholarship’, p. 74.

17 Paul Herbert, ‘Towards the Best Available Thought: The Writing of Field Manual 100-5, “Operations” by the United States Army, 1973–1976’, PhD Dissertation, Ohio State University, 1985.

18 Gilman, Nils, Mandarins of the Future: Modernization Theory in Cold War America (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003)Google Scholar; Solovey, Mark, ‘Project Camelot and the 1960s Epistemological Revolution: Rethinking the Politics-Patronage-Social Science Nexus’, Social Studies of Science, 31:2 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Isaac, Joel, ‘The Human Sciences in Cold War America’, The Historical Journal, 50:3 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Latham, Michael E, Modernization as Ideology: American Social Science and ‘Nation Building’ in the Kennedy Era (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2000)Google Scholar. See also, fn 2 of this article.

19 Ferguson, James, The Anti-Politics Machine: ‘Development’, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994)Google Scholar; Escobar, Arturo, Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995)Google Scholar; Duffield, Mark R., Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security (London: Zed Books, 2001)Google Scholar.

20 Compare Foucault, Michelet al., Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1975–76 (New York: Picador, 2003), p. 56Google Scholar.

21 Amadae, S. M., Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2003)Google Scholar.

22 Asad, Talal (ed.), Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter (London: Ithaca Press,1973)Google Scholar; Fabian, Johannes, Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object (New York: Columbia University Press, 2002)Google Scholar.

23 Cohn, Bernard S., Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996)Google Scholar; Dirks, Nicholas B., Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001)Google Scholar. See also Hobsbawm, E. J. and Ranger, T. O., The Invention of Tradition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983)Google Scholar; Guha, Ranajit (ed.), Subaltern Studies Reader, 1986–1995 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997)Google Scholar.

24 Compare Gusterson, ‘The Cultural turn in the War on Terror’.

25 Habermas, Jürgen, Theory of Communicative Action, trans. McCarthy, Thomas (Boston: Beacon Press, 1984), p. 25Google Scholar.

26 Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality (New York: Pantheon Books, 1978), p. 93Google Scholar.

27 Sahlins, Marshall, Waiting for Foucault, Still (Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, 2002), p. 20Google Scholar. We thank our reviewers for drawing our attention to these passages.

28 See, for example, Headrick, Daniel, The Tools of Empire: Technology and European Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981)Google Scholar.

29 Johnson, Rob, The Afghan Way of War (London: Hurst, 2011)Google Scholar; Johnson, Thomas H. and Mason, M. Chris, ‘No Sign until the Burst of Fire: Understanding the Pakistan-Afghanistan Frontier’, International Security, 32:4 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gregory, Derek, The Colonial Present: Afghanistan, Palestine, and Iraq (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2004)Google Scholar. For an earnest argument that modern occupying forces should emulate Napoleon's use of ‘census, cadastre, and ID cards’ in Egypt see Batson, Douglas, Leonardo, Al Di, and Tucker, Christopher K., ‘“Napoleonic Know-How” in an Age of Persistent Engagement’, Small Wars Journal, 7:2 (2011)Google Scholar.

30 See, for example, Nagl, John A., Learning to Eat Soup with a Knife: Counterinsurgency Lessons from Malaya and Vietnam (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005)Google Scholar; Ferguson, Niall, Empire: The Rise and Demise of the British World Order and the Lessons for Global Power (New York: Basic Books, 2003)Google Scholar.

31 See, for example, Todorov, Tzvetan, The Conquest of America: The Question of the Other (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1999)Google Scholar; Clendinnen, Inga, Ambivalent Conquests: Maya and Spaniard in Yucatan, 1517–1570 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Frawley, David, The Myth of the Aryan Invasion of India (New Delhi: Voice of India, 1994)Google Scholar.

32 Cohn, Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge, p. 53.

33 Said, Edward W., Orientalism (New York: Vintage Books, 1979)Google Scholar; Stoler, Ann Laura, Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002)Google Scholar; Mitchell, Timothy, Colonising Egypt (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988)Google Scholar.

34 The scale and importance attached to translation are evidenced in attempts at technological solutions, such as Ectaco GI-5 electronic translator; the size of translations contracts, such as one in 2006 for $4.6 bn to provide translators in Iraq for a five year period, fought over by L-3, McNeil, and DynCorp International; and in the existence of standing institutions, such as the DoD's Defense Language Institute.

35 Cohn, Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge, pp. 16–57.

36 Compare Scott, James C., Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985)Google Scholar.

37 This is not to suggest that language instruction was limited to printed forms, only that they were an essential element. New British officers in the Indian army were assigned a munshi to tutor them in Hindustani.

38 Pandey, Sita Ram, From Sepoy to Subedar, Being the Life and Adventures of Subedar Sita Ram, a Native Officer of the Bengal Native Army, Written and Related by Himself, ed. Lunt, James, trans. Lt. Col. Norgate, (Delhi: Vikas Publications, 1970 [orig.pub. 1873])Google Scholar.

39 Nandy, Ashis, The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self under Colonialism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988), p. 32Google Scholar.

40 See Cohn, Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge, pp. 107–11; Dirks, Castes of Mind, pp. 177–80; Fox, Richard Gabriel, Lions of the Punjab: Culture in the Making (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985)Google Scholar.

41 Unpaginated foreword in Betham, R. M., Handbooks for the Indian Army: Marathas and Dekhani Musalmans (Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, India, 1908)Google Scholar.

42 Falcon, R. W., Handbook on Sikhs: For the Use of Regimental Officers (Allahabad: Pioneer Press, 1896), p. 16Google Scholar; quoted in Fox, Lions of the Punjab: Culture in the Making, p. 110.

43 Betham, Marathas and Dekhani Musalmans, p. 96.

44 Centre for South Asian Studies Cambridge, Col. H. B. Hudson, ‘A Backward Glance: A Personal Account of Service in the Indian Army 1932–1947’, p. 63. ‘Raja’ was perhaps not so useful in making fine distinctions among populations as it is an appellation used throughout the subcontinent.

45 See Barkawi, Tarak, ‘Peoples, Homelands, and Wars? Ethnicity, the Military, and Battle among British Imperial Forces in the War against Japan’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 46:1 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 Compare Sahlins, Marshall, How ‘Natives’ Think: About Captain Cook, for Example (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a compelling critique of Sahlins see Obeyesekere, Gananath, The Apotheosis of Captain Cook: European Mythmaking in the Pacific (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997)Google Scholar.

47 Cohn, Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge, p. 5.

48 See, for example, Chow, Rey, The Age of the World Target: Self-Referentiality in War, Theory, and Comparative Work (Durham: Duke University Press, 2006), pp. 2544CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 Gregory, Derek, ‘“The Rush to the Intimate” Counterinsurgency and the Cultural Turn’, Radical Philosophy, 150 (2008), p. 4Google Scholar.

50 Ricks, Thomas E., The Gamble: General David Petraeus and the American Military Adventure in Iraq, 2006–2008 (New York: Penguin Press, 2009), ch. 2Google Scholar.

52 For instance, ‘[t]he Deployable Virtual Training Environment is a simulation designed to teach Marines up to five languages, cultural nuances, convoy operations and the steps to call for fire support.’ Sarah Anderson, ‘Simulation Keeps Combat Center Marines in Fight’, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, {http://www.29palms.marines.mil/News/NewsArticleDisplay/tabid/3005/Article/57418/simulation-keeps-combat-center-marines-in-fight-aspx} accessed 25 March 2013. See also the US Army National Simulation Center and the US Army Research Laboratory.

53 For one personal account of the use of the smart card to present an image of a culturally attuned force see {http://www.boiseweekly.com/TheGrip/archives/2009/11/10/flying-with-marines-a-culture-smart-card} accessed 25 March 2013. See also Rochelle Davis et al., ‘Cultural Sensitivity in a Military Occupation’, in Kelly et al. (eds), Anthropology and Global Counterinsurgency.

54 See, for example, Gusterson, ‘The Cultural Turn in the War on Terror’.

55 Gregory, ‘“The Rush to the Intimate” Counterinsurgency and the Cultural Turn’, p. 4.

56 Ibid., p. 11.

57 As Cohn famously concluded, the British ‘reduced vastly complex codes and their associated meanings to a few metonyms’, Cohn, Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge, p. 162.

58 Quoted in Scott, James C., The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009), p. 98Google ScholarPubMed.

59 FM 2-22.3 13-4; On biometrics generally see Amoore, Louise, ‘Biometric Borders: Governing Mobilities in the War on Terror’, Political Geography, 25 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McCoy, Alfred, Policing America's Empire: The United States, the Philippines, and the Rise of the Surveillance State (London: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2009)Google Scholar; Breckenridge, Keith, ‘The Biometric State: The Promise and Peril of Digital Government in the New South Africa’, Journal of Southern African Studies, 31:2 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Breckenridge, Keith, ‘Verwoerd's Bureau of Proof: Total Information in the Making of Apartheid’, Hist Workshop J, 59:1 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 FM 2-22.3, pp. 13–15.

62 Weber, Max, ‘Science as a Vocation’, in Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright (eds), From Max Weber (New York: Oxford University Press, 1946), p. 147Google Scholar.