Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T15:09:42.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On information dissemination as an informal environmental regulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2013

Aditi Jamalpuria*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Science, Technology & Development Studies, India
*
Address for correspondence: c/o Krishnendu Ghosh Dastidar, Centre for Economic Studies and Planning, School of Social Sciences (II), Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-110067, India. E-mail: j.aditi3@gmail.com

Abstract

The paper analyzes the impact of environmental information dissemination by an information agent in a product market duopoly. The information agent performs the task of disseminating information regarding a green and a polluting firm's environmental profiles to consumers differing in their preferences for the two firms’ products. The result reveals that, in the absence of information dissemination, the green firm earns a lower market share which necessitates the information agent's intervention to encourage the consumption of green product. Moreover, complete information dissemination regarding the green firm's environmental profile is sufficient to generate a higher market share for the green firm. The paper also finds that an increase in information dissemination regarding either of the two firms’ environmental profiles decreases environmental damage accrued to the society and encourages a greener consumption pattern. An eco-efficiency drive is shown to be self-corrective as it negates the need for the informational intervention.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arora, S. and Gangopadhyay, S. (1995), ‘Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance’, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 28: 289309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J., Blamey, R., Louviere, J.J., and Morrison, M. (2001), ‘Green product choice’, in Bennett, J. and Blamey, R. (eds), The Choice of Modeling Approach to Environmental Valuation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 115132.Google Scholar
Bjorner, T.B., Hansen, L.G., and Russell, C.S. (2004), ‘Environmental labeling and consumer's choice – an empirical analysis of the effect of the Nordic Swan’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47: 411434.Google Scholar
Blamey, R. and Bennett, J. (2001), ‘Yea-saying and validation of a choice model of green product choice’, in Bennett, J. and Blamey, R. (eds), The Choice of Modeling Approach to Environmental Valuation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 178201.Google Scholar
Coddington, W. (1990), ‘It's no fad: environmentalism is now a fact of corporate life’, Marketing News, 15 October: 7.Google Scholar
Conrad, K. (2005), ‘Price competition and product differentiation when consumers care for the environment’, Environmental and Resource Economics 31: 119.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, S., Hong, J.H., Laplante, B., and Mamingi, N. (2005), ‘Disclosure of environmental violations and stock market in the Republic of Korea’, Ecological Economics 58: 759777.Google Scholar
Eriksson, C. (2004), ‘Can green consumerism replace environmental regulation? A differentiated-products example’, Resource and Energy Economics 26: 281293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, J., Sterner, T., and Afsah, S. (2007), ‘The public disclosure of industrial pollution: the PROPER approach for Indonesia?Environment and Development Economics 12: 736756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, S. and Goldar, B. (2005), ‘Do stock markets penalize environment-unfriendly behaviour? Evidence from India’, Ecological Economics 52: 8195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henion, K.E. (1972), ‘The effect of ecologically relevant information of detergent sales’, Journal of Market Research 9: 1014.Google Scholar
Kathuria, V. (2007), ‘Informal regulation of pollution in a developing country: evidence from India’, Ecological Economics 63: 403417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, P.W., Laplante, B., and Maxwell, J. (1994), ‘Pollution policy: the role for publicly provided information’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26: 3143.Google Scholar
Konar, S. and Cohen, M. (1996), ‘Information as regulation: the effect of community right to know laws on toxic emissions, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32: 109124.Google Scholar
Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., and Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001), ‘Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products, Journal of Consumer Marketing 18(6): 503520.Google Scholar
Nimon, W. and Beghin, J. (1999), ‘Are eco-labels valuable? Evidence from the apparel industry’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(4): 801811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrakis, E., Sartzetakis, E.S., and Xepapadeas, A. (2005), ‘Environmental information provision as a public policy instrument’, Contributions to Economic Policy & Analysis 4(1): 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powers, N., Blackman, A., Lyon, T.P., and Narain, U. (2008), ‘Does disclosure reduce pollution? Evidence from India's Green Rating Project’, Discussion Paper No. 08-38, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Rennings, K. (2000), ‘Redefining innovation – eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics’, Ecological Economics 32: 319332.Google Scholar
Teisl, M.F., Roe, B., and Hicks, R.L. (1999), ‘Ecocertification: why it may not be a “field of dreams”’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(5): 10661071.Google Scholar
Tirole, J. (1988), The Theory of Industrial Organization, London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wang, H., Bi, J., Wheeler, D., Wang, J., Cao, D., Lu, G., and Wang, Y. (2004), ‘Environmental performance rating and disclosure: China's Green Watch program’, Journal of Environmental Management 71(2): 123133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed