Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T12:14:59.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Segmental distributions and consonant-vowel association patterns in Japanese infant- and adult-directed speech*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2013

SHO TSUJI
Affiliation:
Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, International Max-Planck Research School for Language Sciences, and Laboratory for Language Development, RIKEN Brain Sciences Institute
KENYA NISHIKAWA
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Language Development, RIKEN Brain Sciences Institute
REIKO MAZUKA
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Language Development, RIKEN Brain Sciences Institute, and Duke University

Abstract

Japanese infant-directed speech (IDS) and adult-directed speech (ADS) were compared on their segmental distributions and consonant-vowel association patterns. Consistent with findings in other languages, a higher ratio of segments that are generally produced early was found in IDS compared to ADS: more labial consonants and low-central vowels, but fewer fricatives. Consonant-vowel associations also favored the early produced labial-central, coronal-front, coronal-central, and dorsal-back patterns. On the other hand, clear language-specific patterns included a higher frequency of dorsals, affricates, geminates, and moraic nasals in IDS. These segments are frequent in adult Japanese, but not in the early productions or the IDS of other studied languages. In combination with previous results, the current study suggests that both fine-tuning (an increased use of early produced segments) and highlighting (an increased use of language-specifically relevant segments) might modify IDS on the segmental level.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

We want to thank Mary Beckman, Paula Fikkert, and Clara Levelt for making us aware of the topic of segmental distribution in Japanese infant-directed speech, and Alex Cristia, Robert Grayson, and Kouki Miyazawa for helpful comments throughout revision of the manuscript.

References

REFERENCES

Beckman, M. E., Yoneyama, K. & Edwards, J. (2003). Language-specific and language-universal aspects of lingual obstruent productions in Japanese-acquiring children. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 7, 1828.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, B. H. & Stemberger, J. P. (1998). Handbook of phonological development. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Boysson-Bardies, B. & Vihman, M. M. (1991). Adaptation to language: evidence from babbling and first words in four languages. Language 67, 297319.Google Scholar
Chen, L.-M. & Kent, R. D. (2005). Consonant-vowel co-occurrence patterns in Mandarin-learning infants. Journal of Child Language 32, 507–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G. & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cristia, A. (2013). Input to language: the phonetics and perception of infant-directed speech. Language and Linguistics Compass 7(3), 157–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, T. G. (1977). Mothers' speech adjustments: the contributions of selected child listener variables. In Snow, K. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Talking to children: language input and acquisition, 151–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Daland, R. (2012). Variation in the input: a case study of manner class frequencies. Journal of Child Language. Available at: doi:10.1017/S0305000912000372.Google Scholar
Davis, B. L. & MacNeilage, P. F. (1990). Acquisition of correct vowel production. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 33, 1627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dyson, A. T. & Amayreh, M. M. (2007). Jordanian Arabic speech acquisition. In McLeod, S. (ed.), The international guide to speech acquisition, 288–99. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. & Beckman, M. E. (2008). Some cross-linguistic evidence for modulation of implicational universals by language-specific frequency effects in the acquisition of consonant phonemes. Language Learning & Development 4(2), 122–56.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1977). Baby talk as a simplified register. In Snow, K. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Talking to children: language input and acquisition, 209–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fernald, A. & Morikawa, H. (1993). Common themes and cultural variations in Japanese and American mothers' speech to infants. Child Development 64(3), 637–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fikkert, P. (1994). On the acquisition of rhyme structure in Dutch. In Bok-Bennema, R. & Cremers, C. (eds), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1994, 3748. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fox, A. V. (2007). German speech acquisition. In McLeod, S. (ed.), The international guide to speech acquisition, 386–97. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.Google Scholar
Goldstein, B. A. (2007). Spanish speech acquisition. In McLeod, S. (ed.), The international guide to speech acquisition, 539–53. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.Google Scholar
Hamano, S. (1998). The sound-symbolic system of Japanese (Studies in Japanese Linguistics, Vol. 10). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications; Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Howard, S. (2007). English speech acquisition. In McLeod, S. (ed.), The International guide to speech acquisition, 188203. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1999). Phonological acquisition. In Barrett, M. (ed.), The development of language, 7397. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1941/1968). Child language, aphasia and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kent, R. D. (1992). The biology of phonological development. In Ferguson, C. A., Menn, L., & Stoel-Gammon, C. (eds), Phonological development: models, research, implications, 6590. Parkton, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Kitamura, C., Thanavishuth, C., Burnham, D. & Luksaneeyanawin, S. (2001). Universality and specificity in infant-directed speech: pitch modifications as a function of infant age and sex in a tonal and non-tonal language. Infant Behavior and Development 24(4), 372–92.Google Scholar
Kunnari, S. & Savinainen-Makkonen, T. (2007). Finnish speech acquisition. In McLeod, S. (ed.), The international guide to speech acquisition, 351–63. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.Google Scholar
Lee, S. A. & Davis, B. (2010). Segmental distribution patterns of English infant- and adult-directed speech. Journal of Child Language 37(4), 767–91.Google Scholar
Lee, S. A., Davis, B. & MacNeilage, P. (2007). ‘Frame dominance’ and the serial organization of babbling, and first words in Korean-learning infants. Phonetica 64, 217–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S. A., Davis, B. & MacNeilage, P. (2008). Segmental properties of input to infants: a study of Korean. Journal of Child Language 35(3), 591617.Google Scholar
Lee, S. A. & Nakayama, M. (2000). Characteristics of maternal speech in Korean: Do Korean and Japanese maternal speech show similar characteristics? In Howell, S. C., Fish, S. A. & Keith-Lucas, T. (eds), Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development 24, 486–97. Boston: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Lorwatanapongsa, P. & Maroonroge, S. (2007). Thai speech acquisition. In McLeod, S. (ed.), The international guide to speech acquisition, 554–65. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.Google Scholar
MacNeilage, P. & Davis, B. (2000). On the origin of internal structure of word forms. Science 288(5465), 527–31.Google Scholar
MacNeilage, P., Davis, B., Kinney, A. & Matyear, C. L. (2000). The motor core of speech: a comparison of serial organization patterns in infants and languages. Child Development 71(1), 153–63.Google Scholar
Maekawa, K. (2003). Corpus of Spontaneous Japanese: Its design and evaluation. Proceedings of the ISCA & IEEE Workshop on Spontaneous Speech Processing and Recognition (SSPR2003), 7–12. Tokyo.Google Scholar
Mazuka, R., Igarashi, Y. & Nishikawa, K. (2006). Input for learning Japanese: RIKEN Japanese mother-infant conversation corpus. Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers Technical Report 16, 1115.Google Scholar
Mazuka, R., Kondo, T. & Hayashi, A. (2008). Japanese mothers' use of specialized vocabulary in infant-directed speech: infant-directed vocabulary in Japanese. In Masataka, N. (ed.), The origins of language, 3958. Tokyo: Springer.Google Scholar
McLeod, S., Doorn, J. V. & Reed, V. A. (2001). Normal acquisition of consonant clusters. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 10(2), 99110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mennen, I. & Okalidou, A. (2007). Greek speech acquisition. In McLeod, S. (ed.), The international guide to speech acquisition, 398411. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.Google Scholar
Murase, T., Ogura, T. & Yamashita, Y. (1992). Ikujigo no kenkyuu (1). Doobutsu meishoo ni kansuru hahaoya no shiyoogo: Ko no geturei ni yoru chigai. [Study of child-rearing vocabulary (1). Mothers' use of animal terms: effects of children's age.] Annual Bulletin of Shimane University, Faculty of Education 17, 3754.Google Scholar
Ramus, F., Nespor, M. & Mehler, J. (2000). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition 75, AD3AD30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ratner, N. B. (1996). From signal to syntax – But what is the nature of the signal? In Morgan, J. & Demuth, K. (eds), From signal to syntax: bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition, 35150. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rose, Y. & Wauquier-Gravelines, S. (2007). French speech acquisition. In McLeod, S. (ed.), The international guide to speech acquisition, 364–85. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.Google Scholar
Saito, Y. (1997). Nihongo no onseigaku nyumon. [Introduction to Japanese phonetics.] Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Shi, R. & Werker, J. F. (2001). Six-month-old infants' preference for lexical words. Psychological Science 12(1), 7075.Google Scholar
Smit, A. B. (2007). General American English speech acquisition. In McLeod, S. (ed.), The international guide to speech acquisition, 128–47. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E. (1977). The development of conversation between mothers and babies. Journal of Child Language 4, 122.Google Scholar
So, L. K. H. (2007). Cantonese speech acquisition. In McLeod, S. (ed.), The international guide to speech acquisition, 313–26. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.Google Scholar
Soderstrom, M. (2007). Beyond babytalk: re-evaluating the nature and content of speech input to preverbal infants. Developmental Review 27(4), 501–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trainor, L. J., Austin, C. M. & Desjardins, R. N. (2000). Is infant-directed speech prosody a result of the vocal expression of emotion? Psychological Science 11(3), 188–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uno, A. (2007). Kotoba to kokoro no hattatsu to shougai. [Development and disorders of language and mind.] Tokyo: Nagaishoten.Google Scholar
Vance, T. J. (1987). An introduction to Japanese phonology. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M. (1992). Early syllables and the construction of phonology. In Ferguson, C. A., Menn, L. & Stoel-Gammon, C. (eds), Phonological development: models, research, implications, 393422. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M. (1993). Variable paths to early word production. Journal of Phonetics 21, 6182.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M., Kay, E., Boysson-Bardies, B., Durand, C. & Sundberg, U. (1994). External sources of individual differences? A cross-linguistic analysis of the phonetics of mothers' speech to one-year-old children. Developmental Psychology 30(5), 651–62.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., Pons, F., Dietrich, C., Kajikawa, S., Fais, L. & Amano, S. (2007). Infant-directed speech supports phonetic category learning in English and Japanese. Cognition 103(1), 147–62.Google Scholar