Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T14:51:47.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Expansions of dense linear orders with the intermediate value property

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Chris Miller*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA, E-Mail: miller@math.ohio-state.edu

Extract

Let ℜ be an expansion of a dense linear order (R, <) without endpoints having the intermediate value property, that is, for all a, bR, every continuous (parametrically) definable function f: [a, b] → R takes on all values in R between f(a) and f(b). Every expansion of the real line (ℝ, <), as well as every o-minimal expansion of (R, <), has the intermediate value property. Conversely, some nice properties, often associated with expansions of (ℝ, <) or with o-minimal structures, hold for sets and functions definable in ℜ. For example, images of closed bounded definable sets under continuous definable maps are closed and bounded (Proposition 1.10).

Of particular interest is the case that ℜ expands an ordered group, that is, ℜ defines a binary operation * such that (R, <, *) is an ordered group. Then (R, *) is abelian and divisible (Proposition 2.2). Continuous nontrivial definable endo-morphisms of (R, *) are surjective and strictly monotone, and monotone nontrivial definable endomorphisms of (R, *) are strictly monotone, continuous and surjective (Proposition 2.4). There is a generalization of the familiar result that every proper noncyclic subgroup of (ℝ, +) is dense and codense in ℝ: If G is a proper nontrivial subgroup of (R, *) definable in ℜ, then either G is dense and codense in R, or G contains an element u such that (R, <, *, e, u, G) is elementarily equivalent to (ℚ, <, +, 0, 1, ℤ), where e denotes the identity element of (R, *) (Theorem 2.3).

Here is an outline of this paper. First, we deal with some basic topological results. We then assume that ℜ expands an ordered group and establish the results mentioned in the preceding paragraph. Some examples are then given, followed by a brief discussion of analytic results and possible limitations. In an appendix, an explicit axiomatization (used in the proof of Theorem 2.3) is given for the complete theory of the structure (ℚ, <, +, 0, 1, ℤ).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Miller, C. and Speissegger, P., Expansions of the real line by open sets: o-minimality and open cores, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 162 (1999), pp. 193208.Google Scholar
[2]Peterzil, Y. and Steinhorn, C., Definable compactness and definable subgroups ofo-minimal groups, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 59 (1999), pp. 769786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Pillay, A. and Steinhorn, C., Definable sets in ordered structures, I, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 295 (1986), pp. 565592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]van den Dries, L., The field of reals with a predicate for the powers of two, Manuscript a Mathematica, vol. 54 (1985), pp. 187195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]van den Dries, L., Dense pairs of o-minimal structures, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 157 (1998), pp. 6178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]van den Dries, L., Tame topology and o-minimal structures, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 248, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar