Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:44:45.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methane production and energy partition of cattle in the tropics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

M. Kurihara ,
T. Magner ,
R. A. Hunter  and
G. J. McCrabb
M. Kurihara*
Affiliation:
CSIRO Tropical Agriculture Tropical Beef Centre, Rockhampton, Queensland 4702, Australia
T. Magner
Affiliation:
CSIRO Tropical Agriculture Tropical Beef Centre, Rockhampton, Queensland 4702, Australia
R. A. Hunter
Affiliation:
CSIRO Tropical Agriculture Tropical Beef Centre, Rockhampton, Queensland 4702, Australia
G. J. McCrabb*
Affiliation:
CSIRO Tropical Agriculture Tropical Beef Centre, Rockhampton, Queensland 4702, Australia
*
*On leave from:Department of Animal Nutrition, National Institute of Animal Industry, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan.
†Corresponding author: Dr Graeme McCrabb, fax + 61 7 4923 8222, email graeme.mccrabb@tag.csiro.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The aim of this experiment was to determine CH4 production and energy partition for a range of diets fed to Bos indicus cattle. Six Brahman cattle were fed on three different diets in a replicated Latin square experiment over three periods. The diets were (1) long-chopped Angleton grass (Dicanthium aristatum) hay ad libitum (DM digestibility (DMD) 41 (se 2)%; 4 g N/kg), (2) long-chopped Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) hay ad libitum (DMD 60 (se 1)%; 14 g N/kg) or (3) 2 kg long-chopped lucerne (Medicago sativa) hay/d plus a high-grain diet (ad libitum) (DMD 70 (se 1)%; 31 g N/kg). CH4 production was measured using confinement-type respiration chambers. Metabolizable energy intake (MJ/d) of cattle fed on Angleton grass (18·4 (se 2·0)) was lower (P< 0·01) than that for Rhodes grass (54·9 (se 2·1)), which was lower (P< 0·01) than that for the high-grain diet (76·7 (se 5·8)). CH4 production (g/d) for cattle fed on Rhodes grass (257 (se 14)) was higher (P< 0·01) than that for cattle fed on both the high-grain diet (160 (se 24)) and Angleton grass (113 (se 16)). CH4 conversion rate (MJ CH4 produced per 100 MJ gross energy intake) was not significantly different between cattle fed on Angleton (10·4 (se 1·1)) and Rhodes (11·4 (se 0·3)) grass, but was higher (P< 0·01) than for cattle fed on the high-grain diet (6·7 (se 0·7)). CH4 production (g/kg live-weight gain) was associated (P< 0·001) with both live-weight gain and feed: gain ratio. We conclude that the relationships between CH4 production, energy utilization and live-weight change of cattle fed on tropical forages differ from those of cattle fed on diets based on temperate forages.

Keywords

RuminantMethane productionTropical forage diet
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , March 1999 , pp. 227 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1999

References

Blaxter, KL & Clapperton, JL (1965) Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. British Journal of Nutrition 19, 511–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brouwer, E (1965) Report of sub-committee on constants and factors. In Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Energy Metabolism, pp. 441–443 [Blaxter, KL, editor]. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Crutzen, PJ, Aselmann, I & Seiler, W (1986) Methane production by domestic animals, wild ruminants, other herbivorous fauna and humans. Tellus 38B, 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czerkawski, JW (1969) Methane production in ruminants and its significance. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 11, 240–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faichney, GJ & White, GA (1983) Methods for the Analysis of Feeds Eaten by Ruminants. Melbourne: CSIRO.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1990) Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1996) Greenhouse Gas Inventory Revised Methodology. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, vol. 3. Bracknell: IPCC.Google Scholar
Johnson, DE & Ward, GM (1996) Estimates of animal methane emissions. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 42, 133–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirchgeßner, M, Windisch, W & Muller, HL (1995) Nutritional factors for the quantification of methane production. In Ruminant Physiology: Digestion, Metabolism, Growth and Reproduction, pp. 333–347 [Engelhardt, WV, Leonhard-Marek, S, Breves, G and Giesecke, D, editors]. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag.Google Scholar
Kurihara, M, Shibata, M, Nishida, T, Purnomoadi, A & Terada, F (1997) Methane production and its dietary manipulation in ruminants. In Rumen Microbes and Digestive Physiology in Ruminants, pp. 199–208 [Onodera, R, Itabashi, H, Ushida, K, Yano, H and Sasaki, Y, editors]. Basel: S. Karger.Google Scholar
Kurihara, M, Terada, F, Hunter, RA, Nishida, T & McCrabb, GJ (1998) The effect of diet and liveweight gain on methane production in temperate and tropical beef cattle. Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Animal Production, vol. 1, pp. 364–365. Seoul: Seoul National University.Google Scholar
Kriss, M (1930) Quantitative relations of the dry matter of the food consumed, the heat production, the gaseous outgo and the insensible loss in body weight of cattle. Journal of Agricultural Research 40, 283.Google Scholar
McCrabb, GJ, Berger, KT, Magner, T, May, C & Hunter, RA (1997) Inhibiting methane production in Brahman cattle by dietary supplementation with a novel compound and the effects on growth. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 48, 323–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magner, T, Sim, WD & Bardsley, DH (1988) Apparatus for urine collection from female cattle in metabolism crates. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 28, 725–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margen, DE, Graham, N, McC Minson, DJ & Searle, TW (1988) Energy and protein values of four forages, including a comparison between tropical and temperate species. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 28, 729–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, DJ (1990) Forage in Ruminant Nutrition. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Minson, DJ & McDonald, CK (1987) Estimating forage intake from the growth of beef cattle. Tropical Grasslands 21, 116–122.Google Scholar
Moe, PW & Tyrrell, HF (1979) Methane production by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 62, 1583–1586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Committee (1996) Australian Methodology for the Estimation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks. Workbook for Livestock, Workbook 6.1. Canberra: Department of Environment, Sport and Territories.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1984) Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1991) Estimation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks. Final Report from OECD Experts Meeting, 18–21 February 1991, Paris, France. Prepared for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Shibata, M, Terada, F, Kurihara, M, Nishida, T & Iwasaki, K (1993) Estimation of methane production in ruminants. Animal Science and Technology (Japan) 64, 790–796.Google Scholar
Standing Committee on Agriculture (1990) Feeding Standards for Australian Livestock, Ruminants. Melbourne: CSIRO.Google Scholar
Terada, FK, Iwasaki, R, Tano, R & Kameoka, K (1987) Comparison of metabolizability and metabolizable energy contents among cattle, sheep and goats fed the same diets. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals. European Association for Animal Production (EAAP) Publication no. 32, pp. 130–133 [Moe, PW, editor]. Rome: EAAP.Google Scholar
Turner, HG & Thornton, RF (1966) A respiration chamber for cattle. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 6, 413–419.Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency (1994) International Anthropogenic Methane Emissions: Estimates for 1990. EPA 230-R-93−010. Washington, DC: Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, US EPA.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ (1994) Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant, 2nd ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB & Lewis, BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vercoe, JE (1970) The fasting metabolism of Brahman, Africander and Hereford × Shorthorn cattle. British Journal of Nutrition 24, 599–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, CH & Twine, JR (1967) Determination of Nitrogen, Sulphur, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium, Calcium and Magnesium in Plant Material by Automatic Analysis. CSIRO Division of Plant Industries Technical Paper no. 24. Canberra: CSIRO Division of Plant Industry.Google Scholar