Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:00:28.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modeling and trajectory tracking control of 6-DOF RSS type parallel manipulator

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2013

Ahmet Dumlu*
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, College of Engineering, Ataturk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey
Koksal Erenturk
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, College of Engineering, Ataturk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: ahmetdumlu@atauni.edu.tr

Summary

In this study, kinematic analysis of 6-DOF RSS parallel manipulator using Denavit Hartenbeng (D-H) method is investigated. In addition, in order to improve the proposed method, determination of all the active and passive angles, required to obtain Jacobian and complete dynamic model of manipulator, is also achieved. The effects of dynamic models of 6-DOF RSS parallel manipulator with its actuators on trajectory tracking control are studied in detail. Feedback dynamic compensation terms of motor-mechanism coupling system that is needed to compute torque control are obtained through both a single link approximation model and a complete dynamic model. The complete model is derived by taking account of the interaction between the input links and coupler links of the manipulator. Simulations showed that obtaining complete model of manipulator by means of D-H method and using computed control law could improve the quality of trajectory tracking control of parallel manipulator.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Stewart, D., “A platform with six degress of freedom,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 180 (15), 371386 (1965–66).Google Scholar
2.Li, Y. and Xu, Q., “Design and development of a medical parallel robot for cardiopulmonary resuscitation,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 12, 265273 (2007).Google Scholar
3.Shoham, M., Burman, M., Zehavi, E., Joskowicz, L., Batkilin, E. and Kunicher, Y., “Bone-mounted miniature robot for surgical procedures: Concept and clinical applications,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 19 (5), 893901 (2003).Google Scholar
4.Xu, W. L., Pap, J. S. and Bronlund, J., “Design of a biologically inspired parallel robot for foods chewing,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 55 (2), 832841 (2008).Google Scholar
5.Xu, W. L., Torrance, J. D., Chen, B. Q., Potgieter, J., Bronlund, J. E. and Pap, J. S., “Kinematics and experiments of a life-sized masticatory robot for characterizing food texture,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 55 (5), 21212132 (2008).Google Scholar
6.Ottaviano, E. and Ceccarelli, M., “Application of a 3 DOF parallel manipulator for earthquake simulations,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 11 (2), 241246 (2006).Google Scholar
7.Lee, K. M. and Arjunan, S., “A three-degrees-of-freedom micromotion in parallel actuated manipulator,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 7 (5), 634641 (1991).Google Scholar
8.Ramadan, A. A., Takubo, T., Mae, Y., Oohara, K. and Arai, T., “Developmental process of a chopstick-like hybrid-structure two-fingered micromanipulator hand for 3-D manipulation of microscopic objects,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 56 (4), 11211135 (2009).Google Scholar
9.Berenguer, F. J. and Huelin, F. M. M., “Zappa, a quasi-passive biped walking robot with a tail: Modeling, behavior, and kinematic estimation using accelerometers,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 55 (9), 32813289 (2008).Google Scholar
10.Pierrot, F., Nabat, V., Company, O., Krut, S. and Poignet, P., “Optimal design of a 4-DOF parallel manipulator: From academia to industry,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 25 (2), 213224 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Huang, T., Chetwynd, D. G., Mei, J. P. and Zhao, X. M., “Tolerance design of a 2-DOF overconstrained translational parallel robot,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 22 (1), 167172 (2006).Google Scholar
12.Liu, K., Fitzgerald, J. M. and Lewis, F. L., “Kinematics analysis of a Stewart platform manipulator,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 40 (2), 282293 (1993).Google Scholar
13.Bi, Z. M. and Lang, Y. T., “Kinematic and dynamic models of a tripod system with a passive leg,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 11 (1), 108112 (2006).Google Scholar
14.Zhang, D. and Gao, Z., “Optimal kinematic calibration of parallel manipulators with pseudoerror theory and cooperative coevolutionary network,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 59 (8), 32213231 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Wang, L. C. T. and Kuo, M. J., “Dynamic load-carrying capacity and inverse dynamics of multiple cooperating robotic manipulators,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 10 (1), 7177 (1994).Google Scholar
16.Lee, K. M. and Shah, D. K., “Dynamic analysis of three degrees of freedom in parallel actuated manipulator,” IEEE J. Robot. Autom. 4 (3), 570578 (1988).Google Scholar
17.Renaud, P., Andreff, N., Lavest, J. M. and Dhome, M., “Simplifying the kinematic calibration of parallel mechanisms using vision-based metrology,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 22 (1), 1222 (2006).Google Scholar
18.Wang, L. C. T. and Chen, C. C., “On the numerical kinematic analysis of general parallel robotic manipulators,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 9 (3), 272285 (1993).Google Scholar
19.Liu, X. J., Jeong, J. I. and Kim, J., “A three translation DOFs parallel cube manipulator,” Robotica 21, 645653 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Lu, Y., Zhang, X., Sui, C., Han, J. and Hu, B., “Kinematics/statics and workspace analysis of a 3 leg 5 DoF parallel manipulator with a UPU-type composite active constrained leg,” Robotica 31, 183191 (2013).Google Scholar
21.Pierrot, F., Dauchez, P. and Fournier, A., “Towards a Fully Parallel 6 DOF Robot for High Speed Applications,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Sacramento, CA (Apr. 9–11, 1991) pp. 12881293.Google Scholar
22.Serdar, K., Serial and Parallel Robot Manipulators: Kinematics, Dynamics, Control and Optimization (InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 2012) pp. 118.Google Scholar
23.Stamper, R. E., A Three Degree of Freedom Parallel Manipulator with Only Translation Degrees of Freedom, Ph.D. Thesis (College Park, MD: University of Maryland, 1997).Google Scholar
24.Müller, A. and Hufnagel, T., “Model based control of redundantly actuated parallel manipulators in redundant coordinates,” Elsevier Robot. Auton. Syst. 60, 563571 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Shand, W. and Cong, S., “Nonlinear computed torque control for a high-speed planar parallel manipulator,” Elsevier Mechatronics 19, 987992 (2009).Google Scholar
26.Zhiyong, Y., Jiang, W. and Jiangping, M., “Motor-mechanism dynamic model based neural network optimized computed torque control of a high speed parallel manipulator,” Elsevier Mechatronics 17, 381390 (2007).Google Scholar
27.Shang, W., Cong, S. and Ge, Y., “Adaptive computed torque control for a parallel manipulator with redundant actuation,” Robotica 30, 457466 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Thomas, U., Maciuszek, I. and Wahl, F. M., “A Unified Notation for Serial, Parallel, and Hybrid Kinematic Structure,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Washington, DC (May 14–18, 2012) pp. 28682873.Google Scholar
29.Lewis, F., Abdallah, C. and Dawson, D., Control of Robot Manipulators (MacMillan, Oxford, UK, 1993) pp. 125130.Google Scholar