We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 July 2014
While Henry II and John's bitter quarrels with the Church have inspired much comment from both contemporaries and modern scholars, Richard Lionheart's relations with the English Church have attracted little notice. The lack of theatrical clashes with the pope or the archbishop of Canterbury has led modern scholars to assume that Richard I enjoyed fortunate relations with his clergy. Richard's most recent biographer has viewed him as “a conventionally pious man,” and contemporary chroniclers depicted him as fitting the Church's definition of the perfect knight whose financial exactions and other faults could be overlooked because of his crusader status.
Almost continuously absent from England, the Lionheart is assumed to have had little opportunity to assert his will in ecclesiastical matters. Yet, Richard I was as determined as his father and brother to defend English monarchs' traditional rights over the Church, because their mastery over such a powerful institution conferred many advantages. Their bishops were also barons who advised the king at great councils, who often held posts in the royal administration, and who owed feudal obligations, even quotas of knights. The royal right of regalia gave Richard custody of church lands during an episcopal vacancy and the right to authorize new elections and to approve bishops-elect.
Sir Christopher Cheney, a leading authority on the twelfth-century Church, observed that Richard I was “forever busy with the English Church.” An examination of the Lionheart's ecclesiastical policy proves him correct, revealing a monarch who had little respect for the Church's freedom and worked to preserve his royal predecessors's authority over it. Richard took care to oversee closely English episcopal elections.
This is a revised version of a paper presented at the Carolinas Symposium on British Studies, Boone, North Carolina, 7 October 1995.
1 Gillingham, John, Richard the Lionheart (New York, 1978), pp. 36–37, 161Google Scholar; see also comments of Richard, A., Histoire des comtes de Poitou, 2 vols. (Paris, 1903), 2: 229, 328Google Scholar.
2 E.g. Salmon, André, ed., Receuil des Chroniques de Touraine, Société archéologique de Touraine (Tours, 1854)Google Scholar, Chron. Magnum Turon., pp. 144–45, obituary of Richard I: “ecclesiae patronus, et divini officii indefessus”; or Ambroise, The Crusade of Richard Lion-Heart, [Estoire de la Guerre sainte], ed. and trans. Hubert, J. H. and La Monte, John L. (New York, 1941)Google Scholar, lines 12134–37, “the finest knight on earth.”
3 Cheney, C. R., From Becket to Langton: English Church Government 1170–1213 (Manchester, 1956), p. 10Google Scholar.
4 Radulphi de Coggeshall Chronicon Anglicanum, ed. Stevenson, J., Rolls Series (London, 1875) [hereafter cited as Coggeshall], p. 26Google Scholar; complaint against Henry II, p. 91, praise of Richard I.
5 Calculation of Richard R. Heiser, based on dates in Handbook of British Chronology.
6 William of Newburgh, Historia rerum Anglicarum, ed. Howlett, Richard, Rolls Series (London, 1884–1885), pp. 451–53Google Scholar; cited by Partner, Nancy, Serious Entertainments: The Writing of History in Twelfth-Century England (Chicago, 1977), p. 65Google Scholar; Bartlett, Robert, Gerald of Wales 1146–1223 (Oxford, 1982)Google Scholar; citing Opera, ed. Brewer, J. S., et al., Vita Sancti Hugonis, 7, Rolls Series (London, 1877), p. 103Google Scholar.
7 In prejudicium et libertatis nostrae et regni nostri, Epistolae Cantuarienses, in Chronicles and Memorials, Richard I, ed. Stubbs, William, Rolls Series, 2 vols. (London, 1864–1865), 2: 404Google Scholar; Three Rolls of the King's Court, ed. Maitland, F. W., Pipe Roll Society, 14 (London, 1891), p. 50Google Scholar, Geoffrey of York's excommunication of William de Stuteville.
8 Duggan, Charles, “From the Conquest to the Death of John,” in Lawrence, C. H., ed., The English Church and the Papacy in the Middle Ages (New York, 1965), p. 93Google Scholar. Popes during Richard's reign were Clement III, d. March 1191, and Celestine III, March 1191 to January 1198, and then Innocent III.
9 Cheney, , From Becket to Langton, p. 91Google Scholar.
10 Walker, David, “Crown and Episcopacy under the Normans and Angevins,” Anglo-Norman Studies 5 (1982): 221Google Scholar.
11 Radulphi de Diceto Opera Historica, ed. Stubbs, William, 2 vols., Rolls Series (London, 1876) [hereafter cited as Ralph Diceto], 2: 128–29Google Scholar; trans, of Cheney, C. R., Pope Innocent III and England (Stuttgart, 1979), p. 127Google Scholar.
12 E.g., his order to the chapter of St. David's, Wales, to send four canons to Normandy to elect a new bishop, Landon, Lionel, The Itinerary of Richard I, Pipe Roll Society, n.s., 13 (1935): 138Google Scholar; Gerald of Wales, Opera, 1, Invectionum Libellus (London, 1861), p. 105Google Scholar.
13 Landon, , Itinerary, p. 7Google Scholar.
14 Benedict of Peterborough [actual author, Howden, Roger], Gesta Regis Henrici Secundi, ed. Stubbs, William, Rolls Series, 2 vols. (London, 1867) [Hereafter cited as Gesta Henrici], 2: 85Google Scholar. Roger of London received his benediction per preceptum regis in spite of a prohibition by Geoffrey, elect of York, p. 100.
15 Appleby, John T., England without Richard 1189–1199 (Ithaca, 1965), p. 9Google Scholar.
16 Gesta, Henrici, 2: 77–78Google Scholar.
17 Ibid., p. 78; Chronica Rogeri de Hovedene, ed. Stubbs, William, Rolls Series, 4 vols. (London, 1868–1871) [hereafter cited as Roger Howden], 3: 7Google Scholar.
18 Gesta, Henrici, 2: 85Google Scholar, “And thus all controversy between [Hubert Walter] and Geoffrey the elect of the church of York was put at rest.”
19 Richard proposed William de Chimillé as archdeacon of Richmond and William de Sainte-Mère-Eglise as canon of York Minster, also Burchard, nephew of Hugh de Puiset, proposed as treasurer of York.
20 Gesta, Henrici, 2: 91–92, 99–100Google Scholar; Roger, Howden, 3: 27Google Scholar.
21 Young, Charles R., Hubert Walter, Lord of Canterbury and Lord of England (Durham, N.C., 1967), pp. 25–27Google Scholar; Gesta, Henrici, 2: 100Google Scholar; Roger, Howden, 3: 27Google Scholar; but Pipe Roll 2 Richard I, ed. Stenton, Doris M., Pipe Roll Society, n.s. 1 (1925): 74, records a debt of only £2,000Google Scholar.
22 Roger, Howden, 3: 28Google Scholar; Gesta, Henrici, 2: 100Google Scholar.
23 Lovatt, Marie B., “The Career and Administration of Geoffrey Plantagenet, Archbishop of York ?1151–1212” (Ph.D. diss., University of Cambridge, 1975)Google Scholar. See also Douie, Decima L., Archbishop Geoffrey Plantagenet and the Chapter of York, St. Anthony's Hall Publications, no. 18 (York, 1960)Google Scholar.
24 Ralph, Diceto, 2: 89Google Scholar; Annales Monastici, ed. Luard, H. R., Rolls Series, 4 vols. (London, 1864–1869), 3: 26Google Scholar, Dunstaple; 4: 44Google Scholar, Osney, Chronica Rogeri de Wendover, ed. Hewlett, H. G., Rolls Series, 3 vols. (London, 1886–1889), 1: 203Google Scholar. For the exact date of the election, see Greenway, Diana E., ed., Fasti, Monastic Cathedrals 1066–1300 (London, 1971), p. 100Google Scholar.
25 Landon, , Itinerary, p. 35Google Scholar.
26 Letter from Messina to his brother John, c. 25 Jan. 1191, Epist. Cantuar, 2: 329, 330Google Scholar.
27 Elections at Worcester, July 1190; Canterbury, Nov. 1191; Bath, Dec. 1191; Exeter, ante 1194; and Canterbury a second time, May 1193. Poggioli, Peter A., “From Politician to Prelate: The Career of Walter of Coutances, Archbishop of Rouen, 1184–1207” (Ph.D. diss., Johns Hopkins University, 1984), p. 75Google Scholar.
28 Epist. Cantuar., 2: 348, 349Google Scholar; Gervase of Canterbury: Historical Works, ed. Stubbs, William, Rolls Series, 2 vols. (London, 1879–1880), 1: 509–10Google Scholar.
29 Letter of John, warning the monks that their election of Longchamp would be contra dignitatem et voluntatem domini regis and that they should not proceed with an election until they heard from the archbishop of Rouen, Epist. Cantuar., 2: 346Google Scholar.
30 Gervase of Canterbury, 1: 508Google Scholar; Epist. Cantuar., 2: 348Google Scholar; for details see Poggioli, , “Walter of Coutances,” pp. 76–80Google Scholar.
31 Gervase of Canterbury, 1: 511Google Scholar; Epist. Cantuar., 2: 349, 353–54Google Scholar; Ralph, Diceto, 2: 103Google Scholar.
32 Warren, W. L., Henry II (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1973), p. 535Google Scholar.
33 The Chronicle of Richard of Devizes, ed. Appleby, John T. (London, 1963), p. 29, editor's noteGoogle Scholar.
34 Roger, Howden, 4: 81–82Google Scholar; see also Cheney, , Innocent III and England, p. 221Google Scholar.
35 Landon, , Itinerary, p. 76Google Scholar.
36 Young, , Hubert Walter, pp. 34–42Google Scholar.
37 Ibid., p. 44; Epist. Cantuar., 2: 364, 362–66Google Scholar; Gervase of Canterbury, 1: 517–18, 522Google Scholar.
38 Epist. Cantuar., 2: 362–66Google Scholar.
39 Greenway, Diana E., ed., Fasti, 4, Salisbury (London, 1991), p. 3Google Scholar.
40 Turner, Ralph V., The English Judiciary in the Age of Glanvill and Bracton (Cambridge, 1985), p. 59Google Scholar.
41 Roger, Howden, 3: 221Google Scholar; Memoriale Walteri de Coventria, ed. Stubbs, William, Rolls Series (London, 1872–1873), 2: 40Google Scholar.
42 Landon, , Itinerary, p. 7Google Scholar.
43 Cheney, , Innocent III and England, pp. 220–21Google Scholar.
44 Poggioli, Peter, “Walter of Coutances,” p. 76Google Scholar.
45 Spear, David S., “The Norman Empire and the Secular Clergy, 1066–1204,” Journal of British Studies 21 (1981–1982): 10, n47Google Scholar.
46 Ralph, Diceto, 2: 128–29Google Scholar; cited by Cheney, , Innocent III and England, p. 126Google Scholar; see the quotation at note 11 above.
47 Cheney, , Innocent III and England, p. 125Google Scholar; Gervase of Canterbury, 1: 530Google Scholar; Roger, Howden, 4: 9–10, 18Google Scholar; Ralph, Diceto, 2: 128–29Google Scholar; Coggeshall, p. 70.
48 Landon, , Itinerary, p. 120Google Scholar; Coggeshall, p. 70. Richard had named Eustace archdeacon of Richmond and treasurer of York in 1196, Roger, Howden, 4: 12, 14Google Scholar.
49 Ralph, Diceto, 2: 164–66Google Scholar; Landon, , Itinerary, p. 138Google Scholar; Cheney, , Innocent III and England, p. 126Google Scholar. On William's career, see Turner, Ralph V., Men Raised from the Dust (Philadelphia, 1988), pp. 20–34Google Scholar.
50 Ralph, Diceto, 2: 166Google Scholar; also Coggeshall, p. 89.
51 Ralph, Diceto, 2: 146Google Scholar; Roger, Howden, 4: 13Google Scholar, describes John's succession to Worcester as the “gift” of King Richard.
52 Poggioli, , “Walter of Coutances,” p. 122Google Scholar.
53 Roger, Howden, 4: 78Google Scholar.
54 Annales Monastici, 4: 390, WorcesterGoogle Scholar; Knowles, David, The Monastic Order in England 940–1216, (2nd ed.; Cambridge, 1963), p. 335Google Scholar.
55 Roger, Howden, 4: 45Google Scholar; Sanders, I. J., English Baronies (Oxford, 1960), p. 100Google Scholar.
56 Epist. Cantuar., 2: 318Google Scholar.
57 Monks were Richard, prior of Dover, elected to Canterbury; Baldwin of Forde, named first to Worcester, then translated to Canterbury as Archbishop Richard's successor; and Hugh of Avalon, named to Lincoln. Curialists were Reginald fitz Jocelin named to Bath, Geoffrey Ridel to Ely, Richard of Ilchester to Winchester, Geoffrey Plantagenet to Lincoln, John of Oxford to Norwich, Walter of Coutances to Lincoln, and Hugh de Nonant to Coventry/Lichfield. Greenway, , Monastic Cathedrals, pp. 4, 100Google Scholar; Warren, , Henry II, pp. 535, 553Google Scholar; Walker, , “Crown and Episcopacy,” p. 220Google Scholar.
58 Turner, Ralph V., King John (London, 1994), pp. 151, 178Google Scholar.
59 Lovatt, , “Geoffrey Plantagenet,” p. 36Google Scholar. Cheney, , Beckel to Langton, pp. 35–41Google Scholar, sees Hubert Walter as flexible enough to serve both his monarch and his church well; he takes issue with scholars who have depicted Hubert as purely secular in interests and have denigrated his spiritual qualities.
60 Knowles, , Monastic Order, p. 188Google Scholar.
61 Turner, Ralph V., “Clerical Justices in English Secular Courts,” Medievalia et Humanistica, n.s., 3 (1972)Google Scholar, reprinted in Judges, Administrators and the Common Law in Angevin England (London, 1994), pp. 164–66Google Scholar; Magna Vita Sancti Hugonis, ed. Douie, Decima L. and Farmer, Hugh, 2 vols. (London, 1961–1962), 2: 28–29Google Scholar; his reply to Hubert Walter's letter, 1: 111–13.
62 My paper, “Richard Lionheart and the Church in his Continental Domains,” presented to the Western Society for French History, Las Vegas, Nevada, 8 November 1995.
63 Baldwin, , The Government of Philip Augustus (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1983), pp. 65–68, 176–77, 307–09Google Scholar. Elsewhere Baldwin comments that out of eighty-four episcopal elections in Philip's time, only five resulted in the selection of royal clerks, in Bautier, R. H., ed., La France de Philippe Auguste, le temps des mutations (Paris, 1982), p. 383Google Scholar.
64 Stubbs, , Epist. Cantuar., p. lxxxiGoogle Scholar, cited with approval by Cheney, , Becket to Langton, p. 20, n 5Google Scholar.
65 Knowles, , Monastic Order, p. 399Google Scholar; Medieval Studies Presented to Aubrey Gwynn, ed. Watt, J. A., Morrall, J. B., Martin, F. X. (Dublin, 1961), p. 289Google Scholar.
66 Eustace of Ely, Mauger of Worcester, and de Sainte-Mère-Eglise, William, Turner, , Men Raised from the Dust, p. 30Google Scholar.
