Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:36:42.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geographical variations in Salmonella incidence in Israel 1997–2006: the effect of rural residency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2012

M. WEINBERGER*
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases Unit, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel School of Medicine, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
V. AGMON
Affiliation:
Government Central Laboratories, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel
S. YARON
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
I. NISSAN
Affiliation:
Government Central Laboratories, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel
C. PERETZ
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, Epidemiology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
*
*Author for correspondence: M. Weinberger, M. D., Head, Infectious Diseases Unit, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin 70300, Israel. (Email: miriw@netvision.net.il)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The overall incidence and serotype distribution of non-typhoid Salmonella (NTS) may vary between different geographical localities. To investigate possible regional differences and the effect of demographic factors, we studied 15 865 episodes of laboratory-confirmed NTS infection in Israel. Using Poisson models we found significant variation in the average annual incidence rate of NTS in 15 administrative sub-districts, which was inversely associated with the percent of rural residency (incidence rate ratio 0·75, 95% confidence interval 0·65–0·86, P < 0·001). Variation was also found in the relative incidence of the most prominent serotypes (Enteritidis, Virchow, Typhimurium, Hadar, Infantis), which was affected by rural residency, the percent of non-Jewish population in the sub-district, and the percent of population aged ⩾55 years in the sub-district. Rural residency had a major effect on the epidemiology of salmonellosis in Israel. Future research is required to understand whether decreased incidence in rural areas is an under-detection bias or reflects true differences in NTS illnesses.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

INTRODUCTION

Non-typhoid Salmonella (NTS) is a leading cause of foodborne infections worldwide and a major challenge to healthcare authorities [Reference Scallan13]. In the USA, NTS is a major contributor to hospitalization and death due to foodborne infections [Reference Scallan1, Reference Barton4]. Increasing resistance to antibiotics, including quinolones and β-lactams, is another important global concern [Reference Crump5, Reference Sjolund-Karlsson6]. In most patients, NTS infection presents as a self-limited gastroenteritis, lasting 3–7 days. In 5–8% of patients, however, the infection may become invasive and extend beyond the gastrointestinal tract [Reference Pegues, Ohl, Miller, Mandell, Bennett and Dolin7, Reference Zaidenstein8]. Overall mortality rates in developed countries are less than 1% [Reference Barton4, Reference Jones9], but are higher in the African continent [Reference Morpeth, Ramadhani and Crump10]. Mortality has been associated with invasive disease, patient's age, state of immune suppression, the infecting serotype, and geographical location [Reference Scallan1, Reference Pegues, Ohl, Miller, Mandell, Bennett and Dolin7, Reference Jones9].

The sources of NTS infection are mostly foodborne, mainly from food of animal origin, including poultry and eggs, beef, and dairy products [Reference Pegues, Ohl, Miller, Mandell, Bennett and Dolin7]. Roughly 10% of illnesses are the result of direct animal contact, including reptiles, amphibian pets and farm animals [Reference Sjolund-Karlsson6, Reference Aiken, Lane and Adak11, Reference Harris12]. Fresh produce, as well as microwavable ready-to-eat foods, are increasingly recognized as the cause of large-scale outbreaks and raise issues regarding the safety of our food chain [Reference Cavallaro13Reference Tauxe16]. World Health Organization reports have revealed significant variations in the incidence and serotype distribution between countries and geographical localities [Reference Hendriksen17]. Similarly, geographical information system (GIS)-based maps have been used to demonstrate considerable diversity in the overall incidence and serotype distribution in European countries [Reference Jepsen18]. Several studies showed differences in the spatial distribution of NTS infection within even smaller geographical localities such as states or counties [Reference Younus19Reference Calvert, Stewart and Reilly22]. However, there is still little understanding as to the source of such differences. Identifying demographic risk factors may be a useful tool in controlling the Salmonella epidemic, both locally and globally.

The burden of NTS infection in Israel is substantial. Despite a trend of declining incidence over the last two decades, rates are still high compared to those reported in the USA and many European countries [3, Reference Gal-Mor2325]. NTS infection in Israel is associated with a 0·6% 30-day mortality rate and curtailed long-term survival [Reference Weinberger26].

In order to identify environmental factors that may influence the burden of NTS infection in Israel, we investigated regional variations in the incidence and species distribution of NTS infections and their association with geographical and demographic characteristics.

METHODS

Data collection

Salmonellosis is a reportable disease in Israel. All microbiology laboratories countrywide passively submit human Salmonella isolates from all sources to the Ministry of Health's Salmonella Reference Laboratory at the Government Central Laboratories in Jerusalem, where final serological identification is performed according to the Kauffmann–White scheme [Reference Kauffmann27]. Data on episodes of NTS infection for 1997–2006 were retrieved from the Government Central Laboratories' records and included date and source of NTS isolation and results of serotype identification.

During the study period, 180 different NTS serotypes from human sources were received and identified in the Salmonella Reference Laboratory. Five serotypes, Enteritidis, Typhimurium, Virchow, Hadar and Infantis, were responsible for 69% of infection episodes [Reference Weinberger26]. These top five serotypes are the focus of our study.

Patients' identification data were matched, by special permission, with the Ministry of Interior's registry to obtain demographic data including age, sex and home address as described previously [Reference Weinberger26]. For each patient, isolates of the same serotype from the same year were counted only once. Street addresses were geo-coded onto GIS maps. ArcGIS software version 10 (Environmental Systems Research Institute, USA) was used together with geomaps of Israel (MAPA, Israel). Israel is divided into six administrative districts and 15 sub-districts. Geomaps of the sub-districts were used to present the incidence rates in a visual manner.

Demographic characteristics of the sub-districts, including population size and nationality, age distribution, population density and rural/urban characteristics of the settlements were obtained from the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics (http://www1.cbs.gov.il/reader/shnatonenew_site.htm).

Statistical methods

The average annual incidence rate of the total top five NTS serotypes in each sub-district, as well as the average annual incidence rate of the different serotypes were calculated for each year of the study period (1997–2006). Sensitivity analysis of the incidence rate pattern for the 15 sub-districts for two 5-year periods, 1997–2001 and 2002–2006, yielded the same pattern as that found for the overall 10-year study period.

A univariate Poisson model was used to compare the average annual incidence rate of the five top NTS serotypes and of Enteritidis alone (dependent variable) between the various sub-districts (independent variables). The sub-district with the highest population density (Tel Aviv) was used as reference.

A multivariate Poisson model was used to compare the frequency of the different NTS serotypes in each sub-district, across all sub-districts. The dependent variable was the average annual incidence rate of NTS serotypes and the independent variables were the sub-district and the interaction between Salmonella serotypes and the sub-district. Enteritidis, the most frequent serotype, was used as reference.

Univariate and multivariate Poisson models were used to study the association between the average annual incidence rate of Salmonella (dependent variable) and the following demographic characteristics of the sub-districts (independent variables): percent of rural residency, percent of non-Jewish population, and percentages of specific age groups.

A multivariate Poisson model was used to study the effects of the demographic characteristics on the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of the non-Enteritidis NTS serotypes (four serotypes) vs. the Enteritidis serotype. Thus, for each Enteritidis–non-Enteritis serotype pair, a model was built in which the incidence rate was the dependent variable and the independent variables were as follows: an indicator for the serotype (e.g., 1 = Typhimurium, 0 = Enteritidis); the interaction between the serotype and the demographic characteristic (e.g. serotype × percent of rural residency), and a categorical variable for the sub-district.

According to the model, the IRR of a non-Enteritidis vs. Entertains pair estimated using the coefficient of the serotype indicator might depend on the demographic characteristic (estimated using the coefficient of the interaction, e.g. serotype × percent of rural residency).

Each effect was expressed as an IRR and 95% confidence interval (CI) and the models were adjusted for over-dispersion. Analyses were performed using SAS software version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., USA).

Ethical considerations

The study was approved by the local ethics committee at Assaf Harofeh Medical Center and measures were taken to maintain patients' confidentiality.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 15 865 patients with verified demographic data of which 9479 (59·75%) were aged <5 years, and 1733 (10·92%) were aged ⩾55 years. The average annual incidence rates of the total top five NTS serotypes and of the individual serotypes differed among the 15 sub-districts (Fig. 1, Table 1). The highest incidence rate for the total top five NTS serotypes was found in the Petah Tiqwa sub-district of the Central district (35·67/100 000 population) and the lowest was in the Kinneret sub-district of the Northern district (7·96/100 000 population). Compared with the Tel Aviv sub-district, the IRR of the total top five NTS serotypes was significantly higher in two sub-districts (Petah Tiqwa, Jerusalem) and significantly lower in five sub-districts (Kinneret, Golan, Zefat, Yizre'el, Hadera) located in the northern part of Israel (Fig. 2). A similar pattern was found for the incidence of the Enteritidis serotype, the most prevalent among the top five NTS serotypes, when examined alone (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1. Average annual incidence (per 100 000 population) of the total top five Salmonella serotypes in 15 sub-districts, Israel 1997–2006.

Fig. 2. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the total top five Salmonella serotypes (T5) and serotype Enteritidis (E) in 15 sub-districts, Israel 1997–2006. Reference: Tel Aviv sub-district with the highest population density. Sub-districts are arranged in order of IRR magnitude. Kin, Kinneret; Gol, Golan; Zef, Zefat; Yiz, Yizre'el; Had, Hadera; Haif, Haifa; Ram, Ramla; Rehov, Rehovot; T. Aviv, Tel Aviv; B. Shev, Be'er Sheva; Ashq, Ashqelon; Jerus, Jerusalem; Shar, Sharon; P. Tiqw, Petah Tiqwa.

Table 1. NTS incidence and demographic characterization of 15 sub-districts, Israel 1997–2006

* Data presented are for 2001 in the middle of study period 1997–2006.

Both a district and a sub-district.

SD, Sub-district; Ent, Enteritidis; Vir, Virchow; Typ, Typhimurium; Had, Hadar; Inf, Infantis; Top5, top five serotypes; Pop den, population density; Rural settle, % of population living in rural settlements; Non-Jew, non-Jewish population; Age ⩽5 yr, age group ⩽5 years; Age ⩾55 yr, age group ⩾55 years.

Indeed, Enteritidis was the most common NTS serotype in all 15 sub-districts, followed by serotypes Virchow, Typhimurium, Hadar and Infantis (Table 1). This order was maintained in 11 of the 15 sub-districts, while in three sub-districts (Hadera, Golan, Be'er Sheva) Typhimurium ranked second and Virchow ranked third. In one sub-district (Kinneret) Typhimurium ranked first, Virchow ranked second and Enteritidis ranked third (Table 1). When the frequencies of the non-Enteritidis serotypes were compared to that of Enteritidis, the incidence rates of all four non-Enteritidis serotypes were significantly lower than the incidence rate for Enteritidis in nine sub-districts (Fig. 3). In the remaining sub-districts (Golan, Zefat, Kinneret, Yizre'el, Akko, Hadera), all located in the northern part of Israel, the pattern was less uniform. In these sub-districts the incidence rate of Virchow, Typhimurium and Hadar did not usually differ significantly from that of Enteritidis. Serotype Infantis had a significantly lower incidence rate in five of the six sub-districts.

Fig. 3. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of non-Enteritidis Salmonella serotype compared to serotype Enteritidis in 15 sub-districts, Israel 1997–2006. Reference: serotype Enteritidis. Sub-districts are arranged from North to South. V, Serotype Virchow; T, serotype Typhimurium; I, serotype Infantis; H, serotype Hadar; Zef, Zefat; Kin, Kinneret; Yiz, Yizre'el; Gol, Golan; Haif, Haifa; Had, Hadera; Shar, Sharon; P. Tiqw, Petah Tiqwa; Ram, Ramla; Rehov, Rehovot; Jerus, Jerusalem; T. Aviv, Tel Aviv; Ashq, Ashqelon; B. Shev, Be'er Sheva.

Demographic characteristics differed considerably among the 15 sub-districts of Israel (Table 1). Ranges for population density and percent of rural residency were 30·7–6788·0/km2 and 0·4–37·5%, respectively; the range for the non-Jewish population was 0·2–62·7%; and the ranges for age groups <5 years and ⩾55 years were 6·7–13·0% and 18·2–35·9%, respectively.

A high negative correlation was found between the percent of rural residency and population density (Pearson's r = − 0·89, P < 0·0001, log-linear relationship) and so in further analyses we refer only to the percent of rural residency.

The associations between the above-mentioned demographic characteristics of the sub-districts and the average annual incidence rates of the top five NTS serotypes was initially evaluated using a univariate Poisson model. We found a significant inverse association with the percent of rural residency (crude IRR 0·75, 95% CI 0·65–0·86, P < 0·001) and a non-significant association with the other demographic characteristics. Since we found medium to high bivariate correlations between the demographic characteristics in the sub-districts, we were unable to build multivariate models that included all characteristics simultaneously as independent variables.

Table 2 presents results of the Poisson models for the dependence of the relative incidence rate of each non-Enteritidis serotype compared with Enteritidis on the demographic characteristics of each of the sub-districts.

Table 2. The association between the incidence rate of non-Enteritidis compared to Enteritidis NTS serotypes and the demographic characterization of 15 Israeli sub-districts

IRR, Incidence rate ratio; CI, confidence interval.

* Per 10% increase.

The relative incidence rates of serotypes Typhimurium and Infantis compared to Enteritidis were significantly dependent on rural residency (P = 0·001 and P = 0·052, respectively) while that of serotype Hadar was borderline significantly dependent (P = 0·131). The relative incidence rates of serotypes Typhimurium, Hadar and Infantis were significantly dependent on the percent of non-Jewish population (P = 0·006, P = 0·036, P = 0·044, respectively) in a positive way and significantly dependent on the proportion of population aged ⩾55 years (P = 0·016, P = 0·217, P = 0·210, respectively) in a negative way. The relative incidence rate of serotype Virchow did not depend significantly on any of the demographic characteristics of the sub-districts. The relative incidence rates of all four non-Enteritidis serotypes were not significantly dependent on the proportion of population in the <5 years age group in the sub-districts.

DISCUSSION

Our study demonstrated significant variations in the incidence rates of NTS illnesses throughout Israel, which were negatively associated with the percent of rural residency. The lowest incidence rates were found in northern Israel where the proportion of rural residency is the highest.

Israel is a small country with substantial demographic variety in its districts and sub-districts. About half of the Israeli population lives in central Israel, while most of the rural settlements are concentrated in the five northern sub-districts. The sub-district of Tel Aviv, located in the centre of Israel, constitutes a huge urban metropolitan area. In terms of nationality, about 75% of the Israeli population is Jewish; the largest non-Jewish population is located in the northern sub-districts, followed by Be'er Sheva, Israel's southernmost sub-district (http://www.old.health.gov.il/download/pages/briut_sofi.pdf).

Previous studies that examined the effect of urban vs. rural residency on the incidence of Salmonella infection found conflicting results. While a Scottish study suggested that the incidence of Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 was higher in rural areas [Reference Calvert, Stewart and Reilly22], a study conducted in Ontario, Canada, using the ArcGis system and Poisson regression models, found significantly higher rates of this pathogen in counties with a high degree of urbanization [Reference Ford21]. Studies from Michigan, USA showed a similar incidence of NTS in both rural and urban counties [Reference Younus19, Reference Arshad20].

How does the degree of urbanization affect Salmonella incidence rates? There are several possible explanations. First, it is highly likely that the lower incidence in rural areas is false, reflecting the lower availability of healthcare facilities rather than the true incidence of infected persons. In the present study, the incidence rate is based on the number of culture-confirmed infections, which in turn relies on patients seeking medical care and the vigilance of physicians in submitting stool cultures from patients with diarrhoeal illnesses [Reference Voetsch28]. A recent publication by the Israel Ministry of Health reveals disturbing inequalities in the distribution of community healthcare services in rural compared to urban areas. The availability of doctors and primary-care clinics is lower in rural communities, particularly so in northern and southern Israel (http://www.old.health.gov.il/download/pages/briut_sofi.pdf). Notably, a study con ducted in southern Israel showed that distance from the ‘big city’ has a negative effect on the number of clinic visits made [Reference Lubetzky29].

Second, inhabitants of rural areas may be more likely to purchase their food products from small, local businesses rather than large supermarket chains. In addition, eating out may be less commonly practised in rural communities. Eating chicken prepared outside the home was found to be a risk factor for Salmonella Enteritidis infection in the USA [Reference Marcus30] and a recent meta-analysis found that chicken consumed at restaurants was a major risk factor for salmonellosis [Reference Domingues31].

Variations in the incidence of Salmonella and other foodborne illnesses have also been associated with socioeconomic status. Lower socioeconomic status may negatively affect healthcare-seeking behaviour, thus creating a bias towards lower Salmonella detection in persons in this group [Reference Younus32]. On the other hand, individuals of higher socioeconomic status are more likely to exhibit risky food consumption practices (eating pink hamburgers, eating undercooked eggs, eating raw oysters, drinking raw milk) and food-handling habits (not washing hands with soap after handling raw meat or chicken and not washing the cutting surface with soap/bleach after using it for cutting raw meat or chicken), increasing the number of reported foodborne illnesses in this group [Reference Altekruse33]. The above may provide insight into our results, which show that the lowest incidence of NTS infection is found in the northern district, as this district also has the lowest average income and the highest rate of unemployment in Israel (http://www.old.health.gov.il/download/pages/briut_sofi.pdf).

The study also revealed variations in the relative incidence of the individual top five NTS serotypes in the 15 sub-districts of Israel where relative frequencies of non-Enteritidis serotypes were higher in the northern sub-districts. Higher incidence rates of non-Enteritidis serotypes (except for Virchow) compared to serotype Enteritidis were significantly affected by the degree of urbanization, the percentage of non-Jewish population, and the percentage of adults aged ⩾55 years. Ethnicity and religion may also play an important role in people's food consumption and preparation and even food-purchasing habits, as exemplified by a recent Israeli consumers research by Oz Almog, which noted that the Israeli Arabic population tends to shop in local shopping centres and is therefore less likely to purchase food in the country-wide supermarket chains (http://www.peopleil.org/details.aspx?itemID=7821&searchMode=0&index=1). The incidence of NTS serotypes is also known to differ in the various age groups in Israel [Reference Weinberger34]. About one quarter of the elderly Israeli population (aged ⩾65 years) live alone, and are relatively less affluent compared to the general population [Reference Brodsky, Shnoor and Be'er35]. This may also affect food purchasing and dietary habits. For example, elderly people who live alone may prefer ready-to-eat foods, and those with lower incomes may purchase poorer quality food products. Understanding the specific food sources of the various NTS serotypes may shed more light on this issue.

One of the limitations of this study is that it relies on passive reporting to the National Salmonella Reference Center. Hence, possible reporting differences among the sub-districts may have a considerable effect on the findings of our study. To explore this possible bias, we examined reporting rates of enteropathogens (Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter) by the Sentinel Laboratory Network, which was established in 1997 by the Israeli Center for Disease Control (ICDC) and which covers about 30% of the Israeli population [Reference Bassal36]. Laboratories in the network passively submit Salmonella isolates to the National Salmonella Reference Center, while actively reporting salmonellosis episodes to the ICDC. Compared to the active reporting, the passive submission rate of isolates was 96·5% and there were no significant differences between the various areas covered by the Sentinel Network [37].

In summary, urban residency was found to have a major effect on the epidemiology of salmonellosis in Israel. Differences in the relative distribution of Salmonella serotypes were also affected by ethnicity and population's age. Future ecological research should focus on the patterns of health-seeking behaviours and habits related to food consumption and handling that may explain these variations. In particular, more research is required to understand whether these differences reflect true variability in Salmonella illnesses or stem merely from detection bias.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by the Israeli Science Foundation (grant no. 1275/04).

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

REFERENCES

1.Scallan, E, et al. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States – major pathogens. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2011; 17: 715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Majowicz, SE, et al. The global burden of nontyphoidal Salmonella gastroenteritis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2010; 50: 882889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.European Food Safety Authority European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. The European Union Summary Report on Trends and Sources of Zoonoses, Zoonotic Agents and Food-borne Outbreaks in 2010. EFSA Journal 2012; 10: 442 pp (http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/2597.htm). Accessed 20 April 2012.Google Scholar
4.Barton, Behravesh C, et al. Deaths associated with bacterial pathogens transmitted commonly through food: foodborne diseases active surveillance network (FoodNet), 1996–2005. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2011; 204: 263267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Crump, JA, et al. Antimicrobial resistance among invasive nontyphoidal Salmonella enterica isolates in the United States: National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System, 1996 to 2007. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2011; 55: 11481154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Sjolund-Karlsson, M, et al. CTX-M-producing non-Typhi Salmonella spp. isolated from humans, United States . Emerging Infectious Diseases 2011; 17: 9799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Pegues, DA, Ohl, ME, Miller, SI. Salmonella species, including Salmonella Typhi. In: Mandell, GL, Bennett, JE, Dolin, R, eds. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 5th edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier, Churchill Livingstone; 2009, pp. 26362654.Google Scholar
8.Zaidenstein, R, et al. The epidemiology of extraintestinal non-typhoid Salmonella in Israel: the effects of patients’ age and sex. European Journal of Clinical Mirobiology and Infectious Diseases 2010; 29: 11031109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Jones, TF, et al. Salmonellosis outcomes differ substantially by serotype. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2008; 198: 109114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Morpeth, SC, Ramadhani, HO, Crump, JA. Invasive non-Typhi Salmonella disease in Africa. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2009; 49: 606611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Aiken, AM, Lane, C, Adak, GK. Risk of Salmonella infection with exposure to reptiles in England, 2004–2007. Eurosurveillance 2010; 15: 19581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Harris, JR, et al. Recent multistate outbreaks of human salmonella infections acquired from turtles: a continuing public health challenge. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2010; 50: 554559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Cavallaro, E, et al. Salmonella typhimurium infections associated with peanut products. New England Journal of Medicine 2011; 365: 601610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Barton, Behravesh C, et al. 2008 outbreak of Salmonella Saintpaul infections associated with raw produce. New England Journal of Medicine 2011; 364: 918927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Taylor, MR. Will the Food Safety Modernization Act help prevent outbreaks of foodborne illness? New England Journal of Medicine 2011; 365: e18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Tauxe, RV, et al. Evolving public health approaches to the global challenge of foodborne infections. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2010; 139 (Suppl. 1): S1628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Hendriksen, RS, et al. Global monitoring of Salmonella serovar distribution from the World Health Organization Global Foodborne Infections Network Country Data Bank: results of quality assured laboratories from 2001 to 2007. Foodborne Pathogens and Diseases 2011; 8: 887900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Jepsen, MR, et al. Creating an online atlas of Salmonella serotypes in Europe. Eurosurveillance 2008; 13.Google ScholarPubMed
19.Younus, M, et al. Demographic risk factors and incidence of Salmonella enteritidis infection in Michigan. Foodborne Pathogens and Diseases 2006; 3: 266273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Arshad, MM, et al. Epidemiologic attributes of invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella infections in Michigan, 1995–2001. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2008; 12: 176182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Ford, MW, et al. A descriptive study of human Salmonella serotype typhimurium infections reported in Ontario from 1990 to 1998. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases 2003; 14: 267273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Calvert, N, Stewart, WC, Reilly, WJ. Salmonella typhimurium DT104 infection in people and animals in Scotland: a collaborative epidemiological study 1993–96. Veterinary Records 1998; 143: 351354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Gal-Mor, O, et al. Multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis, Israel. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2010; 16: 17541757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Weinberger, M, Keller, N. Recent trends in the epidemiology of non-typhoid Salmonella and antimicrobial resistance: the Israeli experience and worldwide review. Current Opininion in Infectious Diseases 2005; 18: 513521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Vital signs: incidence and trends of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food – foodborne diseases active surveillance network, 10 U. S. sites, 1996–2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2011; 60: 749755.Google Scholar
26.Weinberger, M, et al. Curtailed short-term and long-term survival following infection with non-typhoid Salmonella in Israel. Clinical Mirobiology and Infection 2011; 17: 278284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Kauffmann, F. Classification of Bacteria. A Realistic Scheme with Special Reference to the Classification of Salmonella and Escherichia species . Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1975.Google Scholar
28.Voetsch, AC, et al. FoodNet estimate of the burden of illness caused by nontyphoidal Salmonella infections in the United States. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2004; 38 (Suppl. 3): S127134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Lubetzky, H, et al. Distance and socioeconomic status as a health service predictor on the periphery in the southern region of Israel. Health Policy 2011; 100: 310316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Marcus, R, et al. Re-assessment of risk factors for sporadic Salmonella serotype Enteritidis infections: a case-control study in five FoodNet Sites, 2002–2003. Epidemiology and Infection 2007; 135: 8492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Domingues, AR, et al. Source attribution of human salmonellosis using a meta-analysis of case-control studies of sporadic infections. Epidemiology and Infection 2012; 140: 959969.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Younus, M, et al. The role of neighborhood level socioeconomic characteristics in Salmonella infections in Michigan (1997–2007): assessment using geographic information system. International Journal of Health Geographics 2007; 6: 56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Altekruse, SF, et al. A multi-state survey of consumer food-handling and food-consumption practices. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 1999; 16: 216221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Weinberger, M, et al. Blood invasiveness of Salmonella enterica as a function of age and serotype. Epidemiology and Infection 2004; 132: 10231028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Brodsky, J, Shnoor, Y, Be'er, S.The elderly in Israel – statistical abstract 2010 (http://mashav.jdc.org.il/_Uploads/dbsAttachedFiles/Kshishim-2010.pdf). Accessed 20 April 2012.Google Scholar
36.Bassal, R, et al. Recent trends in the epidemiology of non-typhoidal Salmonella in Israel, 1999–2009. Epidemiology and Infection 2012; 140: 14461453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Israel Center for Disease Control Israel Ministry of Health. Summary of one year of surveillance in the sentinel laboratories. Publication no. 7000h, 2005.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Average annual incidence (per 100 000 population) of the total top five Salmonella serotypes in 15 sub-districts, Israel 1997–2006.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the total top five Salmonella serotypes (T5) and serotype Enteritidis (E) in 15 sub-districts, Israel 1997–2006. Reference: Tel Aviv sub-district with the highest population density. Sub-districts are arranged in order of IRR magnitude. Kin, Kinneret; Gol, Golan; Zef, Zefat; Yiz, Yizre'el; Had, Hadera; Haif, Haifa; Ram, Ramla; Rehov, Rehovot; T. Aviv, Tel Aviv; B. Shev, Be'er Sheva; Ashq, Ashqelon; Jerus, Jerusalem; Shar, Sharon; P. Tiqw, Petah Tiqwa.

Figure 2

Table 1. NTS incidence and demographic characterization of 15 sub-districts, Israel 1997–2006

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of non-Enteritidis Salmonella serotype compared to serotype Enteritidis in 15 sub-districts, Israel 1997–2006. Reference: serotype Enteritidis. Sub-districts are arranged from North to South. V, Serotype Virchow; T, serotype Typhimurium; I, serotype Infantis; H, serotype Hadar; Zef, Zefat; Kin, Kinneret; Yiz, Yizre'el; Gol, Golan; Haif, Haifa; Had, Hadera; Shar, Sharon; P. Tiqw, Petah Tiqwa; Ram, Ramla; Rehov, Rehovot; Jerus, Jerusalem; T. Aviv, Tel Aviv; Ashq, Ashqelon; B. Shev, Be'er Sheva.

Figure 4

Table 2. The association between the incidence rate of non-Enteritidis compared to Enteritidis NTS serotypes and the demographic characterization of 15 Israeli sub-districts