Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T10:56:24.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anarchy and Hierarchy in International Relations: Examining South America's War-Prone Decade, 1932–41

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2013

Ahsan I. Butt
Ahsan I. Butt*
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia. E-mail: abutt4@gmu.edu
Get access

Abstract

This article questions the validity of anarchy as an assumption in International Relations theory. Powerful states often provide public goods to smaller states in return for their acquiescence on matters of interest. This transactional provision of public goods is analogous to how central governments behave in domestic environments; thus the hierarchic structure of domestic politics is replicated in international politics. The anarchy-hierarchy distinction, which rests on a neat separation of international and domestic structures, is therefore highly contentious. One public good that great powers provide, largely ignored by the literature on hierarchy, is justice. Powerful states can provide a forum for aggrieved parties to settle their disputes, and thus contain conflicts before they escalate to war. If such a forum is no longer provided, the system reverts to anarchy, where escalation—and therefore, war—is more likely. South America's war-prone decade can be explained by the variation in structural conditions on the continent. Due to the Depression, its Good Neighbor policy, and the onset of World War II, the United States was less interested in South American affairs in the 1930s, resulting in a more anarchic structure and a higher propensity for war.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 67 , Issue 3 , July 2013 , pp. 575 - 607
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Art, Robert J. 2003. A Grand Strategy for America. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Barclay, Glen. 1971. Struggle for a Continent: The Diplomatic History of South America 1917–1945. London: Sidgwick and Jackson.Google Scholar
Berger, Mark T. 1993. Civilising the South: The US Rise to Hegemony in the Americas and the Roots of ‘Latin American Studies’ 1898–1945. Bulletin of Latin American Research 12 (1):1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, Robert N. 1965. By Reason or Force: Chile and the Balancing of Power in South America, 1830–1905. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Albert, Mathias. 2010. Differentiation: A Sociological Approach to International Relations Theory. European Journal of International Relations 16 (3):315–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Jones, Charles, and Little, Richard. 1993. The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Little, Richard. 2000. International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Centeno, Miguel Angel. 2002. Blood and Debt: War and the Nation-State in Latin America. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Child, Jack. 1985. Geopolitics and Conflict in South America: Quarrels Among Neighbors. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian. 2009. Towards an English School Theory of Hegemony. European Journal of International Relations 15 (2):203–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbacho, Alejandro Luis. 2003. Predicting the Probability of War During Brinkmanship Crises: The Beagle and the Malvinas Conflicts. Working Paper 244. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Universidad del CEMA. Available at ⟨http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1016843⟩. Accessed 2 March 2012.Google Scholar
De La Pedraja, René. 2006. Wars of Latin America, 1899–1941. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland and Company.Google Scholar
de Ronde, Philip. 1935. Paraguay, A Gallant Little Nation: The Story of Paraguay's War With Bolivia. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
Dominguez, Jorge I. 1980. The United States and Its Regional Security Interests: The Caribbean, Central, and South America. Daedalus 109 (4):115–33.Google Scholar
Dominguez, Jorge I., Mares, David, Orozco, Manuel, Palmer, David Scott, Aravena, Francisco Rojas, and Serbin, Andres. 2004. Boundary Disputes in Latin America. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace. Available at ⟨http://www.usip.org/files/resources/pwks50.pdf⟩. Accessed 22 December 2009.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2006. Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society. European Journal of International Relations 12 (2):139–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2009. Rethinking Political Structures: From ‘Ordering Principles’ to ‘Vertical Differentiation’—and Beyond. International Theory 1 (1):49–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farcau, Bruce W. 1996. The Chaco War: Bolivia and Paraguay, 1932–1935. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Google Scholar
Fearon, James. 1994. Ethnic War as a Commitment Problem. Paper presented at the 90th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August, New York.Google Scholar
Garner, William R. 1966. The Chaco Dispute: A Study of Prestige Diplomacy. Washington, D.C.: Public Affairs Press.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Erik. 1992. Wars and Peace Treaties 1816–1991. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Government of Ecuador. 1938. Ecuadorean-Peruvian Boundary Negotiations. Ecuador Insists upon Her Proposal to Submit the Entire Controversy to Arbitration Juris by the President of the United States of America. Baltimore: Reese Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Rodney Bruce. 1997. Moral Authority as a Power Resource. International Organization 51 (4):591–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Margaret Daly. 1980. Security to the South: U.S. Interests in Latin America. International Security 5 (1):130–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hechter, Michael. 2000. Containing Nationalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegre, Håvard, Oneal, John R., and Russett, Bruce. 2010. Trade Does Promote Peace: New Simultaneous Estimates of the Reciprocal Effects of Trade and Conflict. Journal of Peace Research 47 (6):763–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herz, John H. 1950. Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma. World Politics 2 (2):157–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herz, Monica, and Nogueira, João Pontes. 2002. Ecuador vs. Peru: Peacemaking Amid Rivalry. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1934 [1651]. Leviathan. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Hobson, John M., and Sharman, J. C.. 2005. The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change. European Journal of International Relations 11 (1):63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi J. 1996. The State, War, and the State of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Scott C., and Lake, David A.. 1989. The Second Face of Hegemony: Britain's Repeal of the Corn Laws and the American Walker Tariff of 1846. International Organization 43 (1):1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1978. Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma. World Politics 30 (2):167–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joffe, Josef. 1984. Europe's American Pacifier. Foreign Policy 54:64–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kacowicz, Arie M. 1998. Zones of Peace in the Third World: South America and West Africa in Comparative Perspective. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kang, David C. 2003/04. Hierarchy, Balancing, and Empirical Puzzles in Asian International Relations. International Security 28 (3):165–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Philip. 1997. Checkerboards and Shatterbelts: The Geopolitics of South America. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Philip, and Child, Jack, eds. 1988. Geopolitics of the Southern Cone and Antarctica. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles P. 1973. The World in Depression, 1929–1939. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 2007. Escape from the State of Nature: Authority and Hierarchy in World Politics. International Security 32 (1):47–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
League of Nations. 1933. The Verdict of the League: Colombia and Peru at Leticia; The Official Documents. Boston: World Peace Foundation.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2005. Argentina: Democratic Survival Amidst Economic Failure. In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks, edited by Hagopian, Francis and Mainwaring, Scott P., 63–89. Cambridge, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindsley, Lisa. 1987. The Beagle Channel Settlement: Vatican Mediation Resolves a Century-Old Dispute. Journal of Church and State 29 (3):435–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 1960 [1694]. An Essay Concerning the True Original, Extent and End of Civil Government. In Social Contract: Essays by Locke, Hume, and Rousseau, edited by Barker, Sir Ernest, 1–143. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maoz, Zeev. 2005. Dyadic Militarized Interstate Disputes Dataset Version 2.0. Available at ⟨http://psfaculty.ucdavis.edu/zmaoz/dyadmid.html⟩. Accessed 8 October 2012.Google Scholar
Mares, David R. 2001. Violent Peace: Militarized Interstate Bargaining in Latin America. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martín, Félix. 2006. Militarist Peace in South America: Conditions for War and Peace. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Herbert L. 1961. The United States and Latin America. International Affairs 37 (1):9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, David. 1995. The Longest Peace: Why Are There So Few Interstate Wars in South America? Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 2001a. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 2001b. The Future of the American Pacifier. Foreign Policy 80 (5):46–61.Google Scholar
Mecham, J. Lloyd. 1961. The United States and Inter-American Security, 1889–1960. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Mecham, J. Lloyd. 1965. A Survey of United States–Latin American Relations. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Paul R., North, Douglass C., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1990. The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade: The Law Merchant, Private Judges, and the Champagne Fairs. Economics and Politics 2:1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Helen. 1991. The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: A Critique. Review of International Studies 17 (1):67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirow, Matthew C. 2004. International Law and Religion in Latin America: The Beagle Channel Dispute. Suffolk Transnational Law Review 28 (1):1–29.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich W. 2008 [1887]. On the Genealogy of Morals: A Polemic. Translated by Smith, Douglas. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1993. Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development. American Political Science Review 87 (3):567–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oye, Kenneth A. 1985. Explaining Cooperation Under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies. World Politics 38 (1):1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parodi, Carlos A. 2002. The Politics of South American Boundaries. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1996. Stability and the Distribution of Power. World Politics 48 (2):239–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Princen, Thomas. 1992. Intermediaries in International Conflict. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1960 [1762]. The Social Contract. In Social Contract: Essays by Locke, Hume and Rousseau, edited by Barker, Sir Ernest, 167–307. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rout, Leslie B. 1970. Politics of the Chaco Peace Conference, 1935–1939. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 2002. Political Obligation and Authority. In The Blackwell Guide to Social and Political Philosophy, edited by Simon, Robert L., 17–37. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. David, Bremer, Stuart, and Stuckey, John. 1972. Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820–1965. In Peace, War, and Numbers, edited by Russett, Bruce M., 19–48. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage. Dataset Version 4.0 Available at ⟨http://www.correlatesofwar.org/COW2%20Data/Capabilities/NMC_v4_0.csv⟩. Accessed 8 October 2012.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter H. 2000. Talons of the Eagle: Dynamics of US–Latin American Relations. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack. 1991. Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
St. John, Ronald Bruce. 1992. The Foreign Policy of Peru. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Department of State. 1910a. Telegram from Secretary of State Knox to Minister Fox, 15 May 1910. In Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States with the Annual Message of the President Transmitted to Congress December 6, 1910. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://images.library.wisc.edu/FRUS/EFacs/1910/reference/frus.frus1910.i0018.pdf⟩. Accessed 12 December 2012.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1910b. Aide-Mémoire to the Ecuadorian Legation, 1 June 1910. In Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States with the Annual Message of the President Transmitted to Congress December 6, 1910. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://images.library.wisc.edu/FRUS/EFacs/1910/reference/frus.frus1910.i0018.pdf⟩. Accessed 12 December 2012.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1910c. Aide-Mémoire to the Chilean Legation, 1 June 1910. In Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States with the Annual Message of the President Transmitted to Congress December 6, 1910. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://images.library.wisc.edu/FRUS/EFacs/1910/reference/frus.frus1910.i0018.pdf⟩. Accessed 12 December 2012.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1910d. Telegram from Acting Secretary of State Wilson to Argentine Chargé, 10 August 1910. In Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States with the Annual Message of the President Transmitted to Congress December 6, 1910. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://images.library.wisc.edu/FRUS/EFacs/1910/reference/frus.frus1910.i0018.pdf⟩. Accessed 12 December 2012.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1928a. Telegram from Secretary of State Kellogg to Chargé McGurk in Bolivia, 4 February 1928. In Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, 1928. Vol. I. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://images.library.wisc.edu/FRUS/EFacs/1928v01/reference/frus.frus1928v01.i0006.pdf⟩. Accessed 12 December 2012.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1928b. Telegram from Secretary of State Kellogg to Ambassador Bliss in Argentina, 11 December 1928. In Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, 1928. Vol. I. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://images.library.wisc.edu/FRUS/EFacs/1928v01/reference/frus.frus1928v01.i0006.pdf⟩. Accessed 12 December 2012.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1931. Memorandum by Acting Secretary of State William Castle, Jr., of a conversation with Brazilian Ambassador Lima e Silva, 18 July 1931. In Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, 1931. Vol. I. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://images.library.wisc.edu/FRUS/EFacs/1931v01/reference/frus.frus1931v01.i0007.pdf⟩. Accessed 12 December 2012.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1932a. Telegram from Assistant Secretary of State White to Minister Wilson in Switzerland, 15 August 1932. In Foreign Relations of the United States Diplomatic Papers, 1932. Vol. V, . Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://images.library.wisc.edu/FRUS/EFacs/1932v05/reference/frus.frus1932v05.i0006.pdf⟩. Accessed 12 December 2012.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1932b. Telegram from Secretary of State Stimson to Ambassador Dearing in Peru, 17 September 1932. In Foreign Relations of the United States Diplomatic Papers, 1932. Vol. V, . Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://images.library.wisc.edu/FRUS/EFacs/1932v05/reference/frus.frus1932v05.i0006.pdf⟩. Accessed 12 December 2012.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1932c. Memorandum by Assistant Secretary of State White, 27 October 1932. In Foreign Relations of the United States Diplomatic Papers, 1932. Vol. V, . Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://images.library.wisc.edu/FRUS/EFacs/1932v05/reference/frus.frus1932v05.i0006.pdf⟩. Accessed 12 December 2012.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1932d. Memorandum by Assistant Secretary of State White, 14 December 1932. In Foreign Relations of the United States Diplomatic Papers, 1932. Vol. V, . Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://images.library.wisc.edu/FRUS/EFacs/1932v05/reference/frus.frus1932v05.i0006.pdf⟩. Accessed 12 December 2012.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1941a. Telegram from Secretary of State Hull to Chargé Burdett in Brazil, 2 January 1941. In Foreign Relations of the United States Diplomatic Papers, 1941. Vol. , , edited by Perkins, E. R.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://images.library.wisc.edu/FRUS/EFacs/1941v06/reference/frus.frus1941v06.i0005.pdf⟩. Accessed 12 December 2012.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1941b. Memorandum of Conversation by Under Secretary of State Welles, 28 February 1941. In Foreign Relations of the United States Diplomatic Papers, 1941. Vol. VI, , edited by Perkins, E. R.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://images.library.wisc.edu/FRUS/EFacs/1941v06/reference/frus.frus1941v06.i0005.pdf⟩. Accessed 12 December 2012.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1941c. Note sent by Peruvian Minister for Foreign Affairs Solf y Muro to Ecuadorian Minister for Foreign Affairs Tobar Donoso, 9 April 1941. In Foreign Relations of the United States Diplomatic Papers, 1941. Vol. VI, , edited by Perkins, E. R.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://images.library.wisc.edu/FRUS/EFacs/1941v06/reference/frus.frus1941v06.i0005.pdf⟩. Accessed 12 December 2012.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. 1941d. Telegram from Peruvian Minister for Foreign Affairs Solf y Muro to Secretary of State, 13 May 1941. In Foreign Relations of the United States Diplomatic Papers, 1941. Vol. VI, , edited by Perkins, E. R.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available at ⟨http://images.library.wisc.edu/FRUS/EFacs/1941v06/reference/frus.frus1941v06.i0005.pdf⟩. Accessed 12 December 2012.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. Harrison. 1994. Peace, War, and the Balance of Power. American Political Science Review 88 (3):593–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, Richard J. 1972. The United States and Latin America. New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Watson, Adam. 2007. Hegemony and History. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, Katja. 2000. Hierarchy Amidst Anarchy: Transaction Costs and Institutional Choice. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. Anarchy Is What States Makes of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization 46 (2):391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, and Friedheim, Daniel. 1995. Hierarchy Under Anarchy: Informal Empire and the East German State. International Organization 49 (4):689–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, Arthur P. 1948. The United States and South America: The Northern Republics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Bryce. 1966. The United States and Latin American Wars 1932–1942. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Bryce. 1978. Aggression and History: The Case of Ecuador and Peru. New York: Institute of Latin American Studies, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Zook, David H. 1960. The Conduct of the Chaco War. New York: Bookman Associates.Google Scholar
Zook, David H. 1964. Zarumilla-Marañón: The Ecuador–Peru Dispute. New York: Bookman Associates.Google Scholar