Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:36:33.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Collaborative Approach to Teaching Sound Sculpting, Embodied Listening and the Materiality of Sound

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2013

Doug Van Nort*
Affiliation:
Architectural Acoustics and Electronic Arts, West Hall, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, USA E-mail: dvnt.sea@gmail.com

Abstract

This paper presents recent work in engaging both students and working professionals from a variety of disciplines and backgrounds with the practice of collective and site-specific electroacoustic music creation. The emphasis is placed on embodied, deep listening in tandem with a manual approach to sonic art creation that bridges an understanding of the interplay between digital sound manipulation, larger composed structures and the physical presentation of a work in a given space. Through a practice-oriented approach, participants gain insights into areas such as the abstract world of digital sound recording and representation, the extreme influence on this content enacted by a given sound delivery system and a given space, and the subjective experience of listening to sounds from a variety of orientations and postures, and with varying levels of understanding of the original source recordings. Finally, through a group approach to composing larger structures, participants begin to understand the often mysterious and unsaid processes involved in the normally solitary act of composing electroacoustic music.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clarke, E.F. 2005. Ways of Listening: An Ecological Approach to the Perception of Musical Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, N. 2004. Composers Inside Electronics: Music After David Tudor. Leonardo Music Journal 14.Google Scholar
Dillon, T. 2009. Current and Future Practices: Embedding Collaborative Music Technology in English Secondary Schools. In J. Finney and P. Burnard (eds.) Music Education with Digital Technology, 2nd edn. London: Continuum, pp. 117127.Google Scholar
Driscoll, J., Rogalsky, M. 2004. David Tudor's ‘Rainforest’: An Evolving Exploration of Resonance. Leonardo Music Journal 14.Google Scholar
Godøy, R.I. 2006. Gestural-Sonorous Objects: Embodied Extensions of Schaeffer's Conceptual Apparatus. Organised Sound 11(2): 149157.Google Scholar
Leman, M. 2008. Embodied Music Cognition and Mediation Technology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Neary, M., Winn, J. 2009. Student as Producer: Reinventing the Undergraduate Curriculum. In M. Neary, H. Stevenson and L. Bell (eds.) The Future of Higher Education: Policy, Pedagogy and the Student Experience. London: Continuum, pp. 192210.Google Scholar
Oliveros, P. 1979. Software for People. San Diego, CA: Center for Music Experiment and Related Research University of California at San Diego.Google Scholar
Oliveros, P. 2005. Deep Listening: A Composer's Sound Practice. Bloomington IN: iUniverse.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, P. 1966. Traité des objets musicaux. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Trueman, D. 2007. Why a Laptop Orchestra? Organised Sound 12(2): 171179.Google Scholar
Van Nort, D. 2009a. Doug Van Nort: DLCGO. Leonardo Music Journal 19.Google Scholar
VanNort, D. 2009b. Instrumental Listening: Sonic Gesture as Design Principle. Organised Sound 14(2): 177187.Google Scholar
Van Nort, D. 2010. Multidimensional Scratching, Sound Shaping and Triple Point. Leonardo Music Journal 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wishart, T. 1994. Audible Design. York: Orpheus the Pantomime.Google Scholar