Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T06:10:56.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Residues of Eisenstein series and the automorphic cohomology of reductive groups

Part of: Lie groups Discontinuous groups and automorphic forms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2013

Harald Grobner
Harald Grobner*
Affiliation:
Fakultät für Mathematik, Universität Wien, Nordbergstraße 15, A-1090 Wien, Austria email harald.grobner@univie.ac.at
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let $G$ be a connected, reductive algebraic group over a number field $F$ and let $E$ be an algebraic representation of ${G}_{\infty } $. In this paper we describe the Eisenstein cohomology ${ H}_{\mathrm{Eis} }^{q} (G, E)$ of $G$ below a certain degree ${q}_{ \mathsf{res} } $ in terms of Franke’s filtration of the space of automorphic forms. This entails a description of the map ${H}^{q} ({\mathfrak{m}}_{G} , K, \Pi \otimes E)\rightarrow { H}_{\mathrm{Eis} }^{q} (G, E)$, $q\lt {q}_{ \mathsf{res} } $, for all automorphic representations $\Pi $ of $G( \mathbb{A} )$ appearing in the residual spectrum. Moreover, we show that below an easily computable degree ${q}_{ \mathsf{max} } $, the space of Eisenstein cohomology ${ H}_{\mathrm{Eis} }^{q} (G, E)$ is isomorphic to the cohomology of the space of square-integrable, residual automorphic forms. We discuss some more consequences of our result and apply it, in order to derive a result on the residual Eisenstein cohomology of inner forms of ${\mathrm{GL} }_{n} $ and the split classical groups of type ${B}_{n} $, ${C}_{n} $, ${D}_{n} $.

Keywords

automorphic representationcuspidalresidualEisenstein seriesautomorphic cohomology

MSC classification

Secondary: 11F75: Cohomology of arithmetic groups 11F70: Representation-theoretic methods; automorphic representations over local and global fields 11F55: Other groups and their modular and automorphic forms (several variables) 22E55: Representations of Lie and linear algebraic groups over global fields and adèle rings
Type
Research Article
Information
Compositio Mathematica , Volume 149 , Issue 7 , July 2013 , pp. 1061 - 1090
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2013 

References

Badulescu, I. A. and Renard, D., Unitary Dual of GL$(n)$ at Archimedean places and global Jacquet–Langlands correspondence, Comput. Math. 145 (2010), 1115–1164.Google Scholar
Borel, A., Automorphic forms on reductive groups, in Automorphic forms and applications, IAS/Park City Mathematics Series, vol. 12, Utah, 2002, eds Sarnak, P. and Shahidi, F. (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2007), 5–40.Google Scholar
Borel, A., Stable real cohomology of arithmetic groups, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. 7 (1974), 235–272.Google Scholar
Borel, A. and Casselman, W., ${L}^{2} $-Cohomology of locally symmetric manifolds of finite volume, Duke Math. J. 50 (1983), 625–647.Google Scholar
Borel, A. and Jacquet, H., Automorphic forms and automorphic representations, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. XXXIII, part I (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1979), 189–202.Google Scholar
Borel, A., Labesse, J.-P. and Schwermer, J., On the cuspidal cohomology of $S$-arithmetic subgroups of reductive groups over number fields, Comput. Math. 102 (1996), 1–40.Google Scholar
Borel, A. and Wallach, N., Continuous cohomology, discrete subgroups and representations of reductive groups, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 94 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1980).Google Scholar
Clozel, L., Motifs et Formes Automorphes: Applications du Principe de Fonctorialité, in Automorphic forms, Shimura varieties, and L-functions, vol. I, Ann Arbor, MI, 1988, Perspectives on Mathematics, vol. 10, eds Clozel, L. and Milne, J. S. (Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1990), 77–159.Google Scholar
Clozel, L., On the cohomology of Kottwitz’s arithmetic varieties, Duke Math. J. 72 (1993), 757–795.Google Scholar
Enright, T. J., Relative Lie algebra cohomology and unitary representations of complex Lie groups, Duke Math. J. 46 (1979), 513–525.Google Scholar
Franke, J., Harmonic analysis in weighted ${L}_{2} $-spaces, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. 2 (1998), 181–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franke, J., A topological model for some summand of the Eisenstein cohomology of congruence subgroups, in Eisenstein series and applications, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 258, eds Gan, W. T., Kudla, S. S. and Tschinkel, Y. (Birkhäuser, Boston, 2008), 27–85.Google Scholar
Franke, J. and Schwermer, J., A decomposition of spaces of automorphic forms, and the Eisenstein cohomology of arithmetic groups, Math. Ann. 311 (1998), 765–790.Google Scholar
Gotsbacher, G. and Grobner, H., On the Eisenstein cohomology of odd orthogonal groups, Forum Math. (2012), to appear, doi:10.1515/FORM.2011.118.Google Scholar
Grbac, N. and Grobner, H., The residual Eisenstein cohomology of $S{p}_{4} $ over a totally real number field, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. (2013), to appear.Google Scholar
Grbac, N. and Schwermer, J., On residual cohomology classes attached to relative rank one Eisenstein series for the symplectic group, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 7 (2011), 1654–1705.Google Scholar
Grobner, H., Automorphic Forms, Cohomology and CAP Representations. The Case ${\mathrm{GL} }_{2} $ over a definite quaternion algebra, J. Ramanujan Math. Soc. 28 (2013), 19–43.Google Scholar
Harder, G., Eisenstein cohomology of arithmetic groups. The case $G{L}_{2} $, Invent. Math. 89 (1987), 37–118.Google Scholar
Harder, G., On the cohomology of $SL(2, \mathfrak{O})$, in Lie groups and their representations: Proc. of the summer school on group representations, Budapest, 1971, ed. Gelfand, I. M. (Halsted, New York, 1975), 139–150.Google Scholar
Harder, G., On the cohomology of discrete arithmetically defined groups, in Discrete subgroups of Lie groups and applications to moduli, Papers presented at the Bombay Colloquium, Bombay, 1973 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1975), 129–160.Google Scholar
Kumaresan, S., On the canonical $k$-types in the irreducible unitary $g$-modules with non-zero relative cohomology, Invent. Math. 59 (1980), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, R. P., On the functional equations satisfied by Eisenstein series, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 544 (Springer, Berlin, 1976).Google Scholar
Li, J.-S. and Schwermer, J., On the Eisenstein cohomology of arithmetic groups, Duke Math. J. 123 (2004), 141–169.Google Scholar
Mœglin, C. and Waldspurger, J.-L., Le spectre résiduel de $GL(n)$, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 22 (1989), 605–674.Google Scholar
Mœglin, C. and Waldspurger, J.-L., Spectral decomposition and Eisenstein series (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).Google Scholar
Rohlfs, J. and Speh, B., Pseudo Eisenstein forms and the cohomology of arithmetic groups III: residual cohomology classes, in On certain L-functions: Conference in Honor of Freydoon Shahidi, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, July 23–27, 2007, eds Arthur, J., Codgell, J. W., Gelbart, S., Goldberg, D., Ramakrishnan, D. and Yu, J.-K. (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2011), 501–524.Google Scholar
Schwermer, J., Kohomologie arithmetisch definierter Gruppen und Eisensteinreihen, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 988 (Springer, 1983).Google Scholar
Schwermer, J., Eisenstein series and cohomology of arithmetic groups: the generic case, Invent. Math. 116 (1994), 481–511.Google Scholar
Vogan, D. A. Jr. and Zuckerman, G. J., Unitary representations with nonzero cohomology, Comput. Math. 53 (1984), 51–90.Google Scholar
Wallach, N., On the constant term of a square integrable automorphic form, in Operator algebras and group representations, vol. II, Neptun, 1980, Monographs and Studies in Mathematics, vol. 18 (Pitman, Boston, MA, London, 1984), 227–237.Google Scholar