Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:47:45.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VERY LOW, LOW AND HEAVY WEIGHT BIRTHS IN HONG KONG SAR: HOW IMPORTANT IS SOCIOECONOMIC AND MIGRANT STATUS?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2013

GEORGIA VERROPOULOU  and
STUART BASTEN
GEORGIA VERROPOULOU*
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics & Insurance Science, University of Piraeus, Greece
STUART BASTEN
Affiliation:
Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, UK
*
1Corresponding author. Email: gverrop@unipi.gr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Identification of modifiable factors and mediators linked to low and heavy birth weight is crucial in reducing infant mortality and health care expenditure. The present paper explores the associations of socio-demographic factors and immigrant status of parents with adverse pregnancy outcomes in Hong Kong. The analysis compares very low birth weight (VLBW: <1500 g), low birth weight (LBW: ≥1500 g and <2500 g) and heavy birth weight births (HBW: ≥4500 g) with births of normal weight (≥2500 g and <4500 g) using multinomial regression modelling of a large dataset of 828,975 births of singletons occurring between 1995 and 2009. The findings indicate the expected significant adverse associations between teenage and advanced age of the mother with compromised birth outcomes; teenage motherhood, however, has a protective effect against HBW births. A strong socioeconomic gradient is apparent, more marked among LBW births; low educational attainment of the father, low occupational class, public housing and single motherhood are strongly related to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Regarding immigrant status, women born in South and South-East Asia exhibit consistently higher odds of a compromised outcome. Women born in Hong Kong have significantly higher chances of LBW births while Mainland Chinese and parents from developed countries face higher odds of HBW births. The study identifies high-risk groups such as teenage, older and single mothers, South-East Asians and couples of low socioeconomic profile. Implementation of policies supporting these groups would be beneficial.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , May 2014 , pp. 316 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acevedo-Garcia, D., Soobader, M. J. & Berkman, L. F. (2005) The differential effect of foreign-born status on low birth weight by race/ethnicity and education. Pediatrics 115(1), e20–30.Google Scholar
Acevedo-Garcia, D., Soobader, M. J. & Berkman, L. F. (2007) Low birthweight among US Hispanic/Latino subgroups: the effect of maternal foreign-born status and education. Social Science & Medicine 65, 2503–2516.Google Scholar
Adams, M. M., Elam-Evans, L. D., Wilson, H. G. & Gilbertz, D. A. (2000) Rates of and factors associated with recurrence of preterm delivery. Journal of the American Medical Association 283, 1591–1596.Google Scholar
Agresti, A. (2002) Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Astolfi, P. & Zonta, L. A. (1999) Risks of preterm delivery and association with maternal age, birth order and fetal gender. Human Reproduction 14(11), 2891–2894.Google Scholar
Barker, D. J. P. (1994) The fetal origins of adult disease. Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review 6, 71–80.Google Scholar
Barker, D. J. P. (1998) In utero programming of chronic disease. Clinical Science 95, 115–128.Google Scholar
Bener, A., Abdulrazzaq, Y. M. & Dawodu, A. (1996) Sociodemographic risk factors associated with low birthweight in United Arab Emirates. Journal of Biosocial Science 28, 339–346.Google Scholar
Boulet, S. L., Alexander, G. R., Salihu, H. M. & Pass, M. (2003) Macrosomic births in the United States: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 188(5), 1372–1378.Google Scholar
Cardwell, C. R., Stene, L. C., Joner, G., Davis, E. A., Cinek, O., Rosenbauer, J.et al. (2010) Birthweight and the risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes, a meta-analysis of observational studies using individual patient data. Diabetologia 53, 641–651.Google Scholar
Chaim, W., Mazor, M. & Lieberman, J. R. (1997) The relationship between bacterial vaginosis and preterm birth: a review. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 259, 51–58.Google Scholar
Cheung, Y. B. & Yip, P. S. F. (2001) Social patterns of birth weight in Hong Kong, 1984–1997. Social Science & Medicine 52, 1135–1141.Google Scholar
Chiavarini, M., Bartolucci, F., Gili, A., Pieroni, L. & Minelli, L. (2011) Effects of individual and social factors on preterm birth and low birth weight: empirical evidence from regional data in Italy. International Journal of Public Health 57(2), 261–268.Google Scholar
Donma, M. M. (2011) Macrosomia, top of the iceberg. The charm of underlying factors. Pediatrics International 53, 78–84.Google Scholar
Drooger, J. C., Troe, J. W. M., Borsboom, G. J. M., Hofman, A., Mackenbach, J. P., Moll, H. A.et al. (2005) Ethnic differences in prenatal growth and the association with maternal and fetal characteristics. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 26, 115–122.Google Scholar
Frisbie, W. P., Forbes, D. & Pullum, S. G. (1996) Compromised birth outcomes and infant mortality among racial and ethnic groups. Demography 33(4), 469–481.Google Scholar
Gagnon, A. J., Zimbeck, M., Zeitlin, J. & The ROAM Collaboration (2009) Migration to western industrialised countries and perinatal health: a systematic review. Social Science & Medicine 69, 934–946.Google Scholar
Golding, J. & Shenton, T. (1990) Low birth-weight and pre-term delivery in South-East Asia. The WHO international collaborative study of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Social Science & Medicine 30(4), 497–502.Google Scholar
Huang, R. C., Mori, T. A., Burrows, S., Ha, C. L., Oddy, W. H., Herbison, C.et al. (2012) Sex dimorphism in the relation between early adiposity and cardiometabolic risk in adolescents. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 97(6), E1014–1022.Google Scholar
Huxley, R. R., Shiell, A. W. & Law, C. M. (2000) The role of size at birth and postnatal catch-up growth in determining systolic blood pressure: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Hypertension 18, 815–831.Google Scholar
Jolly, M. C., Sebire, N. J., Harris, J. P., Regan, L. & Robinson, S. (2003) Risk factors for macrosomia and its clinical consequences: a study of 350,311 pregnancies. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 111, 9–14.Google Scholar
Joseph, K. S., Kramer, M. S., Marcoux, L. S., Ohlsson, A., Wen, S. W., Allen, A. & Platt, R. (1998) Determinants of preterm births in Canada from 1981 through 1983 and from 1992 through 1994. New England Journal of Medicine 339, 1434–1439.Google Scholar
Kesmodel, U., Wisborg, K., Olsen, S. F., Henriksen, T. B. & Secher, N. J. (2002) Moderate alcohol intake during pregnancy and the risk of stillbirth and death in the first year of life. American Journal of Epidemiology 155, 305–312.Google Scholar
Kramer, M. S. (1987) Determinants of Low Birth Weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 65(5), 663–737.Google Scholar
Kramer, M. S. (1990) Birth weight and infant mortality: perceptions and pitfalls. Paediatric & Perinatal Epidemiology 4, 381–390.Google Scholar
Kramer, M. S. (2003) The epidemiology of adverse pregnancy outcomes: an overview. Journal of Nutrition 133, 1592–1596S.Google Scholar
Kramer, M. S., Séguin, L., Lydon, J. & Goulet, L. (2000) Socio-economic disparities in pregnancy outcome. Why do the poor fare so poorly? Paediatric & Perinatal Epidemiology 14, 194–210.Google Scholar
Leon, D. A. & Moser, K. A. (2012) Low birth weight persists in South Asian babies born in England and Wales regardless of maternal country of birth. Slow pace of acculturation, physiological constraint or both? Analysis of routine data. Journal of Epidemiology Community Health 66, 544–551.Google Scholar
Letamo, G. & Majelantle, R. G. (2001) Factors influencing low birth weight and prematurity in Botswana. Journal of Biosocial Science 33, 391–403.Google Scholar
Machado, C. J. (2006) Impact of maternal age on birth outcomes: a population-based study of primiparous Brazilian women in the city of Sao Paulo. Journal of Biosocial Science 38, 523–535.Google Scholar
Mandll, L. A., Costenbader, K. H., Simard, J. F. & Karlson, E. W. (2009) Is birthweight associated with risk of rheumatoid arthritis? Data from a large cohort study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 68, 514–518.Google Scholar
Meggiolaro, S. (2009) Low birth weight and parental resources in Italy. Genus 65(1), 103–121.Google Scholar
Mohsin, M., Wong, F., Bauman, A. & Bai, J. (2003) Maternal and neonatal factors influencing premature birth and low birth weight in Australia. Journal of Biosocial Science 35, 161–174.Google Scholar
Mulder, E. J., Robles de Medina, P. G., Huizink, A. C., Van de Bergh, B. R., Buitelaar, J. K. & Visser, G. H. (2002) Prenatal maternal stress. Effects on pregnancy and the (unborn) child. Early Human Development 70(1–2), 3–14.Google Scholar
Parker, J. D., Schoendorf, K. C. & Kiely, J. L. (1994) Associations between measures of socioeconomic status and low birth weight: small for gestational age, and premature delivery in the United States. Annals of Epidemiology 4, 271–278.Google Scholar
Pattenden, S., Dolk, H. & Vrijheid, M. (1999) Inequalities in low birth weight. Parental social class, area deprivation, and “lone mother” status. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 53, 355–358.Google Scholar
Reime, B., Ratner, P. A., Tomaselli-Reime, S. N., Kelly, A., Schuecking, B. A. & Wenzlaff, P. (2006) The role of mediating factors in the associations between social deprivation and low birth weight in Germany. Social Science & Medicine 62, 1731–1744.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, C., Regidor, E. & Gutierrez-Fisac, J. L. (1995) Low birth weight in Spain associated with sociodemographic factors. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 49, 38–42.Google Scholar
Rouse, D. J., Owen, J., Goldenberg, R. L. & Cliver, S. P. (1996) The effectiveness and costs of elective Cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound. Journal of American Medical Association 276(18), 1480–1486.Google Scholar
Russell, R. B., Green, N. S., Steiner, C. A., Meikle, S., Howse, J. L., Poschman, K.et al. (2007) Cost of hospitalization for preterm and low birth weight infants in the United States. Pediatrics 120, e1–10.Google Scholar
Strauss, R. S. (2000) Adult functional outcome of those born small for gestational age: twenty-six–year follow-up of the 1970 British Birth Cohort. Journal of the American Medical Association 283, 625–632.Google Scholar
Torres-Arreola, L. P., Constantino-Casas, P., Flores-Hernández, S., Villa-Barragán, J. P. & Rendón-Macías, E. (2005) Socioeconomic factors and low birth weight in Mexico. BMC Public Health 5(20) doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-20.Google Scholar
Tsimbos, C. & Verropoulou, G. (2011) Demographic and socioeconomic determinants of low birth weight and preterm births among natives and immigrants in Greece: an analysis using nationwide vital registration micro-data. Journal of Biosocial Science 43, 271–283.Google Scholar
Urquia, M. L., Glazier, R. H., Blondel, B., Zeitlin, J., Gissler, M., Macfarlane, A.et al. (2010) International migration and adverse birth outcomes: role of ethnicity, region of origin and destination. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 64, 243–251.Google Scholar
Verropoulou, G. & Tsimbos, C. (2013) Modelling the effects of maternal socio-demographic characteristics on the preterm and term birth weight distributions in Greece using quantile regression. Journal of Biosocial Science 45, 375–390.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Gao, E., Wu, J., Zhou, J., Yang, Q., Walker, M. C.et al. (2009) Fetal macrosomia and adolescence obesity. Results from a longitudinal cohort study. International Journal of Obesity (London) 33, 923–928.Google Scholar
Wen, S. W., Kramer, M. S. & Usher, R. H. (1995) Comparison of birth weight distributions between Chinese and Caucasian infants. American Journal of Epidemiology 141, 1177–1187.Google Scholar
Wessel, H., Cnattingius, S., Bergstrom, S., Dupret, A. & Reitmaier, P. (1996) Maternal risk factors for preterm birth and low birth weight in Cape Verde. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 75(4), 360–366.Google Scholar
WHO (2004) Low Birthweight: Country, Regional and Global Estimates. United Nations Children's Fund and World Health Organization, UNICEF, New York.Google Scholar
Wingate, M. S. & Alexander, G. R. (2006) The healthy migrant theory. Variations in pregnancy outcomes among US-born migrants. Social Science & Medicine 62, 491–498.Google Scholar