Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:11:31.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adivasis, Maoists and Insurgency in the Central Indian Tribal Belt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2013

Jonathan Kennedy  and
Lawrence King
Jonathan Kennedy
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Cambridge [jk428@cam.ac.uk].
Lawrence King
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Cambridge [lk285@cam.ac.uk].
Get access

Abstract

Maoist insurgent or Naxalite activity has expanded markedly in India over the past three decades, especially in the central tribal belt. This paper first uses a unique, district-level dataset to demonstrate that insurgency does not, as is widely argued, occur where tribals or Adivasis have been dispossessed of their land and forced to work as landless labourers. Rather, insurgent activity is most likely to take place in areas where Adivasis retain control of their land. The second part is an in-depth analysis of the Dantewara district. It shows that the Adivasis’ grievances are intimately related to the colonial encounter and neo-colonial state’s desire to control forests and forest resources. While the insurgent leaders are non-Adivasis, they strive to frame the insurgency in terms that are meaningful to Adivasis, and to provide a combination of collective and selective incentives. Nevertheless, some Adivasis oppose the insurgency because it undermines their status, while others do so because of short-term processes operating during the course of the insurgency. A syncretic theoretical approach, which concentrates on the complex and dynamic relationship between insurgents and their support base, and includes insights from Marxian, Weberian and Durkheimian theory, is best suited to explaining Adivasis’ involvement in the insurgency.

Résumé

La rébellion maoïste ou naxalite s’est fortement répandue depuis trente ans notamment dans la zone tribale du centre de l’Inde. L’article utilise d’abord une base de données unique au niveau du district pour montrer que, contrairement à une idée reçue, la contestation ne se développe pas là où les tribus ou Adivasis ont été dépossédés de leurs terres et contraints de travailler comme ouvriers agricoles. C’est tout le contraire. La deuxième partie présente une étude en profondeur du district Dantewara. Les revendications des Adivasis sont intimement liées à la colonisation et à la volonté qu’a l’État postcolonial de contrôler forêts et ressources forestières. Les leaders ne sont pas adivasis mais ils s’efforcent de présenter la contestation dans des termes qui fassent sens pour les Adivasis avec une combinaison d’éléments incitatifs collectifs et sélectifs. Cependant certains groupes adivasis s’opposent à une contestation qui affaiblit leur statut ; d’autres pour des raisons conjoncturelles. Une interprétation dynamique complexe est proposée qui emprunte à Marx, Weber et Durkheim.

Zusammenfassung

In den letzten 30 Jahren hat sich die maoistische oder naxalitische Rebellion in Indien stark ausgebreitet und dies besonders in mittelindischen Stammesgebieten. Aufbauend auf einer einzigen, distriktbezogenen Datenbank zeigt diese Untersuchung, dass der Widerstand sich nicht, wie meist vermutet, dort verbreitet hat, wo die Stämme oder Adivasis enteignet und zu Feldarbeiten gezwungen worden sind. Ganz im Gegenteil. Der zweite Teil der Untersuchung ist dem Distrikt Dantewara gewidmet. Die Forderungen der Adivasis stehen in enger Beziehung zur Kolonialisierung und dem Willen des postkolonialen Staates die Wälder und deren Erträge zu kontrollieren. Selbst wenn die Anführer keine Adivasis sind, verstehen sie es dem Widerstand eine Form zu geben, die für die Adivasis Sinn macht. Es handelt sich um eine Mischung aus kollektiven und selektiven Anreizen. Manche Adivasis lehnen den Widerstand ab, weil er ihre Position schwächt, während andere ihm aus konjunkturellen Gründen zustimmen. Eine dynamische und komplexe Interpretation, unter Einbeziehung von Marx, Weber und Durkheim, erlaubt es, die Beteiligung der Adivasis am Widerstand zu erklären.

Keywords

IndiaTribal BeltAdivasisMaoist insurgencyNaxalitesIndeZone tribaleAdivasisInsurrection maoisteNaxalitesIndienStammesgebieteAdivasisMaoistischer AufstandNaxaliten
Type
Research Articles
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , April 2013 , pp. 1 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © A.E.S. 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Appadurai, Arjun, 1993. “Number in the Colonial Imagination”, in Breckenridge, Carol A. and van der Veer, Peter, eds., Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament (Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 314-339).Google Scholar
Balagopal, Kandalla, 2006a. “Physiognomy of Violence”, Economic and Political Weekly, 41 (22), pp. 2183-2186.Google Scholar
Balagopal, Kandalla, 2006b. “Maoist Movement in Andhra Pradesh”, Economic and Political Weekly, 41 (29), pp. 3183-3187.Google Scholar
Balakrishnan, S., 1993. “PWG resurgence in Bastar”, Times of India, 5 December, p. 9.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Sumanta, 2008. India’s Simmering Revolution: The Naxalite Uprising (New Delhi, Zed Books).Google Scholar
Béteille, André, 1986. “The Concept of Tribe with Special Reference to India”, European Journal of Sociology, 27 (2), pp. 296-318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béteille, André; 1998. “The Idea of Indigenous People”, Current Anthropology, 39 (2), pp. 187–91.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Bela, 2005. “The Naxalite Movement in Central Bihar”, Economic and Political Weekly, 40 (15), pp. 1536-1549.Google Scholar
Bose, Nirmal Kumar, 1941. “The Hindu Method of Tribal Absorption”, Science and Culture, 7, pp. 188-194.Google Scholar
Bose, Soumittra, 2009. “Naxals to foment trouble on Bhumkal centenary”, Times of India, 23 December.Google Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik and Skrede Gleditsch, Kristian, 2009. “Introduction to Special Issue on ‘Disaggregating Civil Wars’”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53 (4), pp. 487-495.Google Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik and Girardin, Luc, 2007. “Beyond Fractionalization: Mapping Ethnicity onto Nationalist Insurgencies”, American Political Science Review, 101, pp. 173-185.Google Scholar
Chidambaram, P., 2009. “Chidambaram inaugurates DGPs/IGPs Conference”, retrieved 15 June 2010 (www.pib.nic.in/release/release.asp?relid=52610).Google Scholar
Cohn, Bernard, 1990. An Anthropologist Among the Historians and Other Essays (New Delhi, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Collier, Paul and Hoeffler, Anke, 2004. “Greed and Grievance in Civil War”, Oxford Economic Papers, 56 (4), pp. 563-395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Paul and Sambanis, Nicholas, eds., 2003. Understanding Civil War: Evidence and Analysis, 2 vol. (Washington, World Bank).Google Scholar
Commissioner for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, 1987. The Report of the Commissioner for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, 1986-1987 (Official Documents Section in the Library of the Central Secretariat).Google Scholar
Communist Party of India (Maoist), 2004. “CPI Maoist Programme”, Central Committee (Provisional) Pamphlet, 21 September.Google Scholar
Communist Party of India (Maoist)—, 2005. Masses of Dandakaranya Rebel: In the Path of Liberation (Kolkata, Radical Publications).Google Scholar
Duyker, Edward, 1987. Tribal Guerrillas: The Santals of West Bengal and the Naxalite Movement, (New Delhi, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Elwin, Verrier, 1936. Leaves from the Jungle: A Diary of Life in a Gond Village (London, John Murray).Google Scholar
Fearon, James and Laitin, David, 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War”, American Political Science Review, 97 (1), pp. 75-90.Google Scholar
Gell, Alfred, 1986. “Newcomers to the world of goods: consumption among the Muria Gonds”, in Appadurai, ArjunThe Social Life of things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 110-140).Google Scholar
Gell, Alfred, 1997. “Exalting the King and Obstructing the State: A Political Interpretation of Royal Ritual in Bastar District, Central India”, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 3, pp. 433-450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghurye, Govind Sadashiv, 1963. The Scheduled Tribe (Bombay, Popular Prakashan).Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jeff and Skocpol, Theda, 1989. “Explaining Revolutions in the Contemporary Third World” Politics and Society, 17 (4), pp. 489-509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of Chhattisgarh, 2005. Human Development Report (Raipur, Government of Chhattisgarh).Google Scholar
Government of India (GoI), 1861. Report on the Bustar and Kharonde Dependencies of the Rapore District (copies of letter sent by L.C. Elliot in 1856) (Cambridge, Cambridge University Library).Google Scholar
Government of India (GoI)—, 1981, 1991, 2001. Census of India (New Delhi, Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India).Google Scholar
Government of India (GoI)—, 2006. National Tribal Policy: A Policy for the Scheduled Tribes of India. (New Delhi, Ministry of Tribal Affairs).Google Scholar
Government of India (GoI)—, 2008. Development Challenges in Extremist Affected Areas: Report of an Expert Group (New Delhi, Planning Commission of India).Google Scholar
Government of India (GoI)—, 2010. Annual Report of the Union Ministry of Home Affairs. (New Delhi, Ministry of Home Affairs).Google Scholar
Government of India (GoI)—, Undateda. Scheduled Areas, retrieved 2 March 2012 (http://tribal.nic.in).Google Scholar
Government of India (GoI)—, Undatedb. Agricultural Census of India 2000-2001, retrieved 2 August 2011 (http://agcensus.nic.in/).Google Scholar
Government of India (GoI)—, Undatedc. Census Data 2001/Metadata, retrieved 2 August 2011 (http://censusindia.gov.in).Google Scholar
Grigson, Wilfred, 1991 [1949]. The Maria Gonds of Bastar (Delhi, India, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Guha, Ramachandra, 2007. “Adivasis, Naxalites and Indian Democracy”, Economic and Political Weekly, 42 (32), pp. 3305-3312.Google Scholar
Guha, Ramachandra, Harivansh, , Naqvi, Farah, Sarma, E. A. S., Sundar, Nandini and Verghese, George B., 2006. “War in the Heart of India: An Enquiry into the Ground Situation in Dantewara District, Chhattisgarh”, retrieved 2 March 2012 (www.cgnet.in/N1/War%10in%20the%20Heart%2058of%20India.pdf.)Google Scholar
Guha, Ramachandra and Gadgil, Madhav, 1989. “State Forestry and Social Conflict in British India”, Past and Present, 123, pp. 141-177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guha, Ranajit, 1983. Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India (Delhi University Press, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Harrison, Selig, 1956. “Caste and the Andhra Communists”, The American Political Science Review, 50 (2), pp. 378-404.Google Scholar
Hegre, Håvard and Sambanis, Nicholas, 2006. “Sensitivity Analysis of the Empirical Literature on Civil War Onset”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50 (4), pp. 508-535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasper, James, 2011. “Emotions and Social Movements: Twenty Years of Theory and Research”, Annual Review of Sociology, 37, pp. 285-304.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis, 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, Bengt, 2003. “Anthropology and the indigenous slot: claims to and debates about indigenous peoples’ status in India”, Critique of Anthropology, 23, pp. 403-423.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Jonathan and King, Lawrence, 2011. “Understanding the conviction of Binayak Sen: Neocolonialism, political violence and the political economy of health in the central Indian tribal belt”, Social Science and Medicine, 72 (10), pp. 1639-1642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Jonathan and Purushotham, Sunil, 2012. “Beyond Naxalbari: A Comparative Analysis of Maoist Insurgency and Counterinsurgency in Independent India”, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 54 (4), pp. 832-862.Google Scholar
Kosambi, , Dharmanand, Damodar, 1975. An Introduction to the Study of Indian History, revised 2nd edition (Bombay, Popular Prakashan).Google Scholar
Kunnath, George, 2006. “Becoming a Naxalite in Rural Bihar: Class Struggle and its Contradictions”, Journal of Peasant Studies, 33 (1), pp. 89-123.Google Scholar
Lyall, Alfred Comyn, 1868. 1868 Report of the Ethnological Committee on Papers Laid before Them and upon the Examination of Specimens of Aboriginal Tribes Brought to the Jubbulpore Exhibition of 1866-67 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Library).Google Scholar
Mamdani, Mahmood, 2002. When Victims Become Killers: Colonialism, Nativism, and the Genocide in Rwanda (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Miklian, Jason. 2011. “Revolutionary Conflict in Federations: The India Case”, Conflict, Security and Development, 11 (1), pp. 25-53.Google Scholar
Minorities at Risk Project, 2009. “Minorities at Risk Dataset”, retrieved 2 August 2011 (http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/mar/).Google Scholar
Murray Li, Tanya, 2000. “Articulating indigenous identity in Indonesia: resource politics and the tribal slot”, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 42, pp. 149-179.Google Scholar
Nagarajan, Rema, 2010. “How can tribals be silent in face of state terror?”, Times of India, 12 April.Google Scholar
Ojha, Sanjay, 2011. “Reds call shots in ‘liberated’ zones: Jairam Ramesh”, Times of India, 4 December.Google Scholar
Padel, Felix, 2009. Sacrificing People: Invasions of a Tribal Landscape (New Delhi, Orient-Blackswan).Google Scholar
Paige, Jeffrey, 1975. Agrarian Revolution: Social Movements and Export Agriculture in the Underdeveloped World (New York, Free Press).Google Scholar
Paige, Jeffrey, 1983. “Social Theory and Peasant Revolution in Vietnam and Guatemala”, Theory and Society, 12 (6), pp. 699-736.Google Scholar
Pathy, Jaganath, 2000. “Tribe, Region and Nation in the Context of the Indian State”, in Sharma, S. L. and Oommen, T. K., eds., Nation and National Identity in South Asia (New Delhi, Orient Longman, pp. 97-111).Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel, 1979. The Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam (Berkeley, University of California Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghavaiah, V., 1971. Tribal Revolts (Nellore, Andhra Rashtra Adimajati Sevak Sangh).Google Scholar
Satapathy, Rajaram, Ojha, Sanjay and Mandal, Caesar, 2010. “The Maoist empire: Rs 1,500cr and counting”, Times of India, 11 April.Google Scholar
Saxena, NC, 2003. “Livelihood Diversification and Non-Timber Forest Products in Orissa: Wider Lessons on the Scope for Policy Change?”, Overseas Development Institute, Working Paper 223.Google Scholar
Scott, James, 1976. The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia (New Haven, Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Scott, James, 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (New Haven, Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Scott, James, 2009. The Art of not being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia (New Haven, Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya, 2006. Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny (New York, Norton).Google Scholar
Shah, Alpa, 2006. “Markets of Protection: The ‘terrorist’ Maoist Communist Centre and the State in Jharkhand, India”, Critique of Anthropology, 26 (3), pp. 297-314.Google Scholar
Shah, Alpa and Pettigrew, Judith, 2009. “Windows Into a Revolution: Ethnographies of Maoism in South Asia”, Dialectical Anthropology, 33 (3/4), pp. 225-251.Google Scholar
Sharma, Anil, 1990. “Cops fail to curb Bastar Naxalism”, Times of India, 23 May, p. 9.Google Scholar
Sharma, Supriy, 2011. “Law of the jungle”, Times of India, 24 April.Google Scholar
Singh, Manmohan, 2006. “PM’s speech at the Chief Minister’s meet on Naxalism”, retrieved 15 May 2008 (http://pmindia.nic.in/speech/content.asp?id=311).Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, 1982. “What Makes Peasants Revolutionary?”, Comparative Politics, 14 (3), pp. 351-375.Google Scholar
Snow, David, Rochford, Burke, Worden, Steven and Benford, Robert, 1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation”, American Sociological Review, 51, pp. 464-481.Google Scholar
Sundar, Nandini, 2007. Subalterns and Sovereigns: An Anthropological History of Bastar, 1854-2006, second edition (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Sundarayya, Puchalapalli, 1972. Telengana People’s Struggle and Its Lessons (Calcutta, Communist Party of India (Marxist)).Google Scholar
Surendran, PK., 1992. “Naxals Target Forest Tribals”, Times of India, 9 November, p. 14.Google Scholar
Surendran, PK., 1993. “Naxalites plan separate state”, Times of India, 20 February, p. 13.Google Scholar
Suykens, Bert, 2010. “Diffuse Authority in the Beedi Commodity Chain: Naxalite and State Governance in Tribal Telengana, India”, Development and Change, 41 (1), pp. 153-178.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney, 2007. “Inside Insurgencies: Politics and Violence in an Age of Civil War”, Perspectives on Politics, 5, pp. 587–60.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles, 1964. The Vendée (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles, 1978. From mobilization to revolution (Reading, Addison-Wesley).Google Scholar
Times of India, 1980. “Three naxalites held in MP”, 6 September, p. 15.Google Scholar
Times of India, 1981. “Adilabad dist. scene of Naxalite activity”, 23 April, p. 21Google Scholar
Times of India, 1982. “Current Topics”, 9 October, p. 8.Google Scholar
Times of India, 1983a. “Nagpur: Hands Chopped”, 25 January, p. 7.Google Scholar
Times of India, 1983b. “Naxalite Foothold in Bastar”, 20 March, p. 6.Google Scholar
Times of India, 1984a. “Naxalites infiltrate M.P. tribal areas”, 11 March, p. 12.Google Scholar
Times of India, 1984b. “Naxalite threat to villagers”, 7 May, p. 21.Google Scholar
Times of India, 1987. “AP Naxalites active in Bastar”, 12 March, p. 7.Google Scholar
Times of India, 1988a. “Naxal middlemen in Bastar”, 11 April, p. 17.Google Scholar
Times of India, 1988b. “Naxalite rule in Bastar”, 6 October, p. 17.Google Scholar
Times of India, 1989. “PUCL exposes police actrocities in Bastar”, 1 August, p. 13.Google Scholar
Times of India, 1992. “Naxals stepping up activities in state”, 27 May, p. 12.Google Scholar
Times of India, 1998. “Naxals in Gadchiroli kill a suspected police informer”, 18 July, p. 5.Google Scholar
Times of India, 2009. “Reds extort Rs 2k cr each year in India: C’garh DGP”, 29 November.Google Scholar
Times of India, 2010a. “Maoists attracting youths with salary, cut of extortion money”, 28 March.Google Scholar
Times of India, 2010b. “8 Maoists also died in Dantewada attack”, 9 April.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2004. “The concept of indigenous peoples”, retrieved 26 May 2009 (http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/PFII%202004%20WS.1%203%20Definition.doc).Google Scholar
Walder, Andrew, 1968. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, edited by Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus (New York, Bedminister Press).Google Scholar
Walder, Andrew, 2006. “Ambiguity and Choice in Political Movements: The Origins of Beijing Red Guard Factionalism”, American Journal of Sociology, 112 (3), pp. 710-750.Google Scholar
Walder, Andrew, 2009. “Political Sociology and Social Movements”, Annual Review of Sociology, 35, pp. 393-412.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1991 [1948]. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by Gerth, Hans and Wright Mills, C (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Weinstein, Jeremy, 2007. Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence (Cambridge, Cambridge University).Google Scholar
Wimmer, Andreas, Cederman, Lars-Erik and Min, Brian, 2009. “Ethnic Politics and Armed Conflict: A Configurational Analysis of a New Global Data Set”, American Sociological Review, 74, pp. 316-337.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric, 1969. Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century (New York, Harper and Row).Google Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth, 2003. Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
World Bank, 2005. “Indigenous peoples”, retrieved 26 September 2009 (http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/Institutional/Manuals/OpManual.nsf/tocall/0F7D6F3F04DD70398525672C007D08ED?OpenDocument.)Google Scholar
Xaxa, Virginius, 1999. “Tribes as Indigenous People of India”, Economic and Political Weekly, 34 (51), pp. 3589-3595.Google Scholar