Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:36:07.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is a New Worldwide Web Possible? An Explorative Comparison of the Use of ICTs by Two South African Social Movements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2013

Herman Wasserman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

In this article the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), especially new media technologies such as e-mail and the Internet, by postapartheid South African social movements is explored. Following a discussion of the use of these technologies by activist groupings in international contexts, a typology suggested by Rheingold (2003) is used as a framework for comparing two South African social movements: the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) and the Anti-Privatization Forum (APF).

Type
Research Article
Information
African Studies Review , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , April 2007 , pp. 109 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agre, P. E. 2002. “Real-Time Politics: The Internet and the Political Process.” The Information Society 18 (31): 311–31.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S., and Swart, C.. 2003. “Report on the Use of ICTs by the Treatment Action Campaign.” Transcriptions of interviews conducted with TAC staff members and volunteers, September 29–30.Google Scholar
Ancer, J. 2004. “60 Held over Protest at Opening.” The Star Online, March 22. www.thestar.co.za/index.php?fSectionID=129&fArticleID=37994.Google Scholar
APF (Anti-Privatisation Forum). 2004a. Press Releases, www.apf.org.za/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=6.Google Scholar
APF (Anti-Privatisation Forum). 2004b. “Solidarity.” www.apf.org.za/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=4.Google Scholar
APF (Anti-Privatisation Forum). 2004c. “Debate and Discussion.” www.apf.org.za/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=28.Google Scholar
APF (Anti-Privatisation Forum). 2004d. “APF Affiliates.” www.apf.org.za/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=3.Google Scholar
Atton, C. 2002. “News Cultures and New Social Movements: Radical Journalism and the Mainstream Media.” Journalism Studies 3 (4): 491–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baber, Z. 2002. “Engendering or Endangering Democracy? The Internet, Civil Society and the Public Sphere.” Asian Journal of Social Science 30 (2): 287–303.Google Scholar
Ballard, R. 2005. “An Anatomy of New Power.” Mail and Guardian, January 21.Google Scholar
Benjamin, N. 2004. “Organisation Building and Mass Mobilisation.” Development Update 5 (2): 73–93.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L. 2003. “New Media Power: The Internet and Global Activism.” In Couldry, N. and Curran, J., eds., Contesting Media Power. London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Brants, K. 2002. “Politics is E-verywhere.” Communications 27: 171–88.Google Scholar
Bray, J. 1998. “Web Wars: NGOs, Companies and Governments in an Internet-connected World.” Greener Management International 98 (24): 115–30.Google Scholar
Burnett, R., and Marshall, P. D.. 2003. Web Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Castells, M. 2000. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chadwick, A. 2005. “The Internet, Political Mobilization and Organizational Hybridity: ‘Deanspace,’ Moveon.org and the 2004 US Presidential Campaign.” Paper presented to the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom Annual Conference, University of Leeds, April 5–7. www.psa.ac.uk/2005/pps/Chadwick.pdf.Google Scholar
Conradie, D. P., Morris, C., and Jacobs, S. J.. 2003. “Using Information and Commu-nication Technologies (ICT) for Deep Rural Development in South Africa.” Communication 29 (1 & 2): 199–217.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, L. 2001. “Online Publics or Decentred Virtualities? The Habermasian Public Sphere Encounters Cyber-reality.” Paper presented at Euricom Colloquium Electronic Networks and Democratic Life. Piran, Slovenia, September 19–23.Google Scholar
Deibert, R. J. 2000. “International Plug 'n Play? Citizen Activism, the Internet, and Global Public Policy.” International Studies Perspectives 1: 255–72.Google Scholar
Duncan, J. 2003. “Another Journalism Is Possible—Critical Challenges for the Media in South Africa.” Centre for Civil Society Research Report No. 10. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.Google Scholar
Edelman, M. 2001. “Social Movements: Changing Paradigms and Forms of Politics.” Annual Review of Anthropology 30: 285–317.Google Scholar
Etta, F. E., and Parvyn-Wamahiu, S., eds. 2003. Information and Communication Technologies for Development in Africa. Volume 2: The experience with Community Telecentres. Ottawa & Dakar: International Development Research Centre (IDRC) and Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa (CODESRIA).Google Scholar
Ferdinand, P. 2000. The Internet, Democracy and Democratization. Democratization 7(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Forrest, D. 2003. “Social Movements: ‘Ultra-Left’ or ‘Global Citizens’?” Mail and Guardian, January 31.Google Scholar
Friedman, S., and Mottiar, S.. 2004. “A Moral to the Tale: The Treatment Action Campaign and the Politics of HIV/Aids.” Centre for Civil Society Research Report No. 27. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.Google Scholar
Greenstein, R. 2003. “Civil Society, Social Movements and Power in South Africa.” Paper presented at RAU Sociology Seminar Series, September 12. www.nu.ac.za/ccs.Google Scholar
Gripsrud, J. 1999. Understanding Media Culture. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Gurak, L. J. 1999. “The Promise and the Peril of Social Action in Cyberspace.” In Smith, M. A. and Kollock, P., eds., Communities in Cyberspace, 243–63. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gurak, L. J., and Logie, J.. 2003. “Internet Protests, from Text to Web.” In McCaughey, M. and Ayers, M. D., Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice, 25–46. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haffajee, F. 2004. “An Incomplete Freedom.” Harold Wolpe lecture, Centre for Civil Society, University of KwaZulu-Natal. www.nu.ac.za/ccs/default.asp?11,22,5,421.Google Scholar
Hackett, R. A., and Carroll, W. K.. 2004. “Critical Social Movements and Media Reform.” World Association of Christian Communications (WACC). www.wacc.org.uk/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid-1489/.Google Scholar
Hall, M. 2000. “Digital SA.” In Nuttall, Sarah and Michael, Cheryl-Ann, eds., Senses of Culture, 460–75. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heywood, A. 1997. Politics. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Heywood, M. 2003. “TAC: Building a Community Movement.” In: Debate—Voices from the South African Left 9 (August): 4–6.Google Scholar
Hooper-Box, C. 2004. “Soweto Police ‘Tortured Us on Election Day.’” Sunday Independent, May 2.Google Scholar
Jacobs, S. 2004. “Public Sphere, Power and Democratic Politics: Media and Policy Debates in Post-apartheid South Africa.” Ph.D. diss., University of London, Birkbeck College.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. 2002. “Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Africa—A Status Report.” Presented to the Third Task Force Meeting, United Nations Headquarters, September 30–October 1. www.unicttaskforce.org/thirdmeeting/documents/jensen%20v6.doc.Google Scholar
Jones, S., ed. 2003. Encyclopedia of New Media. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Kellner, D. 2002. “Globalization, Technopolitics and Revolution.” In Foran, J., ed., The Future of Revolutions, 180–94. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Lister, M., et al. 2003. New Media: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mbeki, T. 2005. “Address of the President of South Africa, Thabo Mbeki, at the Second Joint Sitting of the Third Democratic Parliament, Cape Town.” February 11. www.info.gov.za/speeches/2005/05021110501001.htm.Google Scholar
McCaughey, M., and Ayers, M. D.. 2003. Cyberactivism—Online Activism in Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McGowan, P. J., and Nel, P.. 2002. Power, Wealth and Global Equity: An International Relations Textbook for Africa. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.Google Scholar
McKinley, D. 2004a. “The Rise of Social Movements in South Africa.” Debate 10, May 17–21.Google Scholar
McKinley, D.. 2004b. “New Power to the People.” Mail and Guardian, May 14.Google Scholar
McKinley, D. and Naidoo, P.. 2004a. Editor's Preface. Development Updated 5 (2): 1–4.Google Scholar
McKinley, D. and Naidoo, P.. 2004b. “New Social Movements in South Africa—A Story in Creation. Development Updated 5 (2): 9–22.Google Scholar
Nedstatbasic. 2003. Page view statistics: TAC. www.nedstatbasic.net/s?tab=l&link=l&id=1398066.Google Scholar
Negus, K., and Román-Velázquez, P.. 2000. “Globalization and Cultural Identities.” In Curran, J. and Gurevitch, M., eds., Mass Media and Society. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Nyamnjoh, F. B. 1999. “Africa and the Information Superhighway: The Need for Mitigated Euphoria.” Ecquid Novi 20 (1): 31–49.Google Scholar
Nyamnjoh, F. B.. 2005. Africa's Media—Democracy and the Politics of Belonging. Pretoria: Unisa Press.Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Z. 1999. “The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as a Public Sphere.” Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC). August, www.aejmc.org.Google Scholar
PHATAM (Pan-African HIV/Aids Treatment Access Movement). 2002. Declaration of Action. www.tac.org.za/newsletter/2002/ns25_08_2002.txt.Google Scholar
Rheingold, H. 2003. “From the Screen to the Streets.” In These Times, October 28. www.inthesetimes.com/print.php?id=414_0_1_0.Google Scholar
Robins, S. 2004. “‘Long Live Zackie, Long Live’: Aids Activism, Science and Citizenship after Apartheid.” Journal of Southern African Studies 30 (3): 651–72.Google Scholar
Rolls, C., and October, A.. 2004. “Report on the Use of ICTs by the Anti-privatisation Forum.” Transcriptions of interviews conducted with APF staff members and volunteers, November.Google Scholar
Sundaram, R. 2000. “Beyond the Nationalist Panopticon: The Experience of Cyberpublics in India.” In Caldwell, J. T., ed., Theories of the New Media: A Historical Perspective, 270–94. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
TAC: Treatment Action Campaign 2003a. Report for January 2002–February 2003. www.tac.org.za/Documents/report02to03pdf.Google Scholar
TAC: Treatment Action Campaign. 2003b. Newsletters. www.tac.org.za/news_2003.htm.Google Scholar
TAC: Treatment Action Campaign. 2003c. Links, www.tac.org.za/links.htm.Google Scholar
TAC: Treatment Action Campaign. 2003d. “Debunking the Denialists.” www.tac.org.za/debunking.htm.Google Scholar
Wasserman, H. 2005a. “Connecting African Activism with Global Networks: ICTs and South African Social Movements.” Africa Development 30 (1): 129–48.Google Scholar
Wasserman, H.. 2005b. “Renaissance and Resistance: Using ICTs for Social Change in South Africa.” African Studies (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Wasserman, H., and De Beer, A. S.. 2004. “E-Governance and E-Publicanism: Preliminary Perspectives on the Role of the Internet in South African Democratic Processes.” Communicatio 20 (1): 64–89.Google Scholar