Article contents
Traceable dynamic measurement of mechanical quantities: objectives and first results of this european project
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 May 2013
Abstract
Nine european national metrology institutes (NMIs) are collaborating in a new project funded by the european metrology research programme (EMRP) to establish traceable dynamic measurement of the mechanical quantities force, pressure, and torque. The aim of this joint research project (JRP) is to develop appropriate calibration methods, mathematical models, and uncertainty evaluation. The duration of the project is 3 years for a global amount of €3.6 million. It began in September 2011.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , 2012 , pp. 127 - 135
- Copyright
- © EDP Sciences 2013
References
EMRP outline 2008 document
C. Schlegel, G. Kiekenap, B. Glöckner, R. Kumme,
Dynamic calibration of force sensors using sinusoidal excitations, Sensordevices
2011, Nice, France
Schlegel, C., Kiekenap, G., Glöckner, B., Buß, A., Kumme, R., Traceable periodic force
calibration, Metrologia
49, 224–235
(2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M. Kobusch, T. Bruns, The new impact force machine
at PTB, in Proc. of XVII IMEKO World Congress, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2003,
pp. 263–267
M. Kobusch, T. Bruns, Uncertainty contributions of
the impact force machine at PTB, in Proc. of XVIII IMEKO World Congress, Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil (CD publication, 2006)
M. Kobusch, T. Bruns, L. Klaus, M. Müller, The 250
kN primary shock force calibration device at PTB, in Measurement, Special Issue:
IMEKO 2010, Pattaya, Thailand (Elsevier), in press
M. Kobusch, L. Klaus, T. Bruns, Model-based
analysis of the dynamic behaviour of a 250 kN shock force calibration device, in
XX IMEKO World Congress, Busan, Republic of Korea, 2012, to be
published
M. Kobusch, T. Bruns, E. Franke, Challenges in
practical dynamic calibration, in Advanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in
Metrology and Testing (World Scientific, 2009), pp. 204–212
T. Bruns, Sinusoidal torque calibration: A design
for traceability in dynamic torque calibrations, in XVII IMEKO World Congress,
Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2003, pp. 282–285
Bruns, T., Kobusch, M., Traceability of dynamic force
and torque calibrations by means of laser-Doppler-interferometry,
Proc. SPIE
5503, 602–607
(2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L. Klaus, T. Bruns, M. Kobusch, Determination of
model parameters for a dynamic torque calibration device, in XX IMEKO World
Congress, Busan, Republic of Korea, 2012, to be published
Williams, J.M., Smith, D.R., Georgakopoulos, D.,
Patel, P.D., Pickering, J.R., Design and metrological
applications of a low noise, high electrical isolation measurement unit,
IET Sci. Meas. Technol.
3, 165–174 (2009)
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M.F. Beug, H. Moser, G. Ramm, Dynamic bridge
standard for strain gauge bridge amplifier calibration, Conference on Precision
Electromagnetic Measurements (CPEM), 2009
Ramm, G., Moser, H., Braun, A., A new scheme for generating and
measuring active, reactive, and apparent power at power frequencies with uncertainties
of 2.5 × 10-6, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas.
48, 422–426
(1999) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, and
OIML, Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in
measurement. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, JCGM 100:2008
S. Eichstädt, Analysis of dynamic
measurements – Evaluation of dynamic measurement uncertainty, Ph.D. thesis, PTB
report IT-16 (2012)
Eichstädt, S., Link, A., Elster, C., Dynamic uncertainty for
compensated second-order systems, Sensors
10, 7621–7631
(2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Link, A., Elster, C., Uncertainty evaluation for IIR
(infinite impulse response) filtering using a state-space approach,
Meas. Sci. Technol.
20, 055104 (2009)
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, C., Link, A., Uncertainty evaluation for dynamic
measurements modelled by a linear time-invariant system,
Metrologia
45, 464–473
(2008) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichstädt, S., Link, A., Bruns, T., Elster, C., On-line dynamic error
compensation of accelerometers by uncertainty-optimal filtering,
Measurement
43, 708–713
(2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
G. Wübbeler, A. Link, T. Bruns, C. Elster, Impact
of correlation in the measured frequency response on the results of a dynamic calibration,
in Advanced mathematical & computational tools in metrology VIII, Series
on Advances in Mathematics for Applied Sciences, edited by F. Pavese, M. Bär,
J.M. Limares, C. Perruchet, N.F. Zhang (World Scientific, New Jersey, 2009), Vol. 78, pp.
369–374
Elster, C., Link, A., Bruns, T., Analysis of dynamic measurements
and determination of time-dependent measurement uncertainty using a second-order
model, Meas. Sci. Technol.
18, 3682–3687
(2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Link, A., Täubner, A., Wabinski, W., Bruns, T., Elster, C., Modelling accelerometers for
transient signals using calibration measurements upon sinusoidal
excitation, Measurement
40, 928–935
(2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Link, A., Täubner, A., Wabinski, W., Bruns, T., Elster, C., Calibration of accelerometers:
determination of amplitude and phase response upon shock excitation,
Meas. Sci. Technol.
17, 1888–1894
(2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M. Kobusch, A. Link, A. Buss, T. Bruns,
Comparison of shock and sine force calibration methods, in Proc. of IMEKO TC3
& TC 16 & TC22 International Conference, Merida, Mexico, 2007
T. Esward, C. Matthews, S. Downes, A. Knott, S.
Eichstädt, C. Elster, Uncertainty evaluation for traceable dynamic measurement of
mechanical quantities: a case study in dynamic pressure calibration, in Advanced
mathematical & computational tools in metrology IX, Göteborg, Sweden,
2011, in press
Eichstädt, S., Elster, C., Esward, T.J., Hessling, J.P., Deconvolution filters for the
analysis of dynamic measurement processes: a tutorial,
Metrologia
47, 522–533
(2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichstädt, S., Link, A., Harris, P., Elster, C., Efficient implementation of a
Monte Carlo method for uncertainty evaluation in dynamic measurements,
Metrologia
49, 401–410
(2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42
- Cited by