Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:49:11.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Industrial Ecology: The Materials Scientist in an Environmentally Constrained World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

For most materials scientists, as for most people, John Donne's lines “and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee.” are simply inspired verse. Increasing recognition of the interplay between human economic activity and global environmental perturbations, however, are beginning to add a cold air of prescience to John's words: “Ask not for whom the CFCs are emitted. They are emitted for thee.”

The need for greater understanding, and new, more systematic approaches to these intertwined economic/environmental issues is becoming more apparent. What is perhaps not so clear is the critical role that materials scientists and engineers must play in this effort. An analysis of the symbiotic relationships among economic development, human population growth, and the uses and flows of materials throughout the economy clearly demonstrates this role.

The intuitive feeling held by many technologists—that they are part of the solution, not part of the problem—certainly appears to be correct. But it will require growth on our part, and a more systems-oriented and comprehensive view of our role, if this promise is to be fulfilled.

Type
Materials and the Environment
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Clark, W.C., “Managing Planet Earth,” special issue, Sci. Am. 261 (3) (1989), p. 4654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Davis, G.R., “Energy for Planet Earth,” special issue, Sci. Am. 263 (3) (1990), p. 5462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Brown, L.R., Durning, A., Flavin, C., French, H., Jacobson, J., Lowe, M., Postel, S., Renner, M., Starke, L., and Young, J., State of the World 1990 (W. W. Norton, New York, 1990).Google Scholar
4.Haub, C., “2050: Standing Room Only?,” The Washington Post, July 8, 1990, p. C3.Google Scholar
5.Deevey, E.S. Jr., Sci. Am. 203 (3) (1980) p. 194206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Smil, V., General Energetics: Energy in the Biosphere and Civilization (Wiley & Sons, New York, 1986).Google Scholar
7.Odum, H.T., Science 242 (25) (1988), p. 11321139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Daly, H.E. and Cobb, J.B. Jr., For the Common Good (Beacon Press, Boston, 1989).Google Scholar
9.Frosch, R.A. and Gallopoulos, N., presentation to the Royal Society, London, February 21, 1990.Google Scholar
10.Frosch, R.A. and Gallopoulos, N.E., Sci. Am. 261 (3) (1989) p. 144152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Ayres, R.U., in Technology and Environment, edited by Ausubel, J.H. and Sladovich, H.E. (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1989) p. 2349.Google Scholar
12. Personal discussions between author, Graedel, T.E., and Linhart, P.B., all of AT&T Bell Laboratories in support of a joint AT&T National Academy of Sciences workshop on industrial ecology held in Washington, DC on May 20-21, 1991.Google Scholar
13.Horgan, J., Sci. Am. 264 (2) (1991) p. 116125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Hardin, G., Science 162 (1968) p. 12431248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Gasser, C.S. and Fraley, R.T., Science 244 (1989) p. 1293–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Pursel, V.G., Pinkert, C.A., Miller, K.F., Bolt, D.J., Campbell, R.G., Palmiter, R.D., Brinster, R.L., and Hammer, R.E., Science 244 (1989) p. 12811288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Amato, I., Science 253 (1991) p. 966968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Pool, R., Science 249 (1990) p. 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Webster, O.W., Science 251 (1991) p. 887893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Alper, J., Science 251 (1991) p. 15621564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar