Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T04:38:08.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shari'at and Muslim community in colonial Punjab, 1865–1885

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2013

ROBERT IVERMEE*
Affiliation:
Centre for Colonial and Postcolonial Studies, University of Kent, UK Email: r.ivermee@kent.ac.uk

Abstract

This paper argues that concerns for the government appointment of qazis, officers for the administration of Muslim law, and the greater application of shari'at critically shaped Muslim community formation in later nineteenth century Punjab. Between 1865 and 1885, Punjabi Muslim elites attested the necessity of qazis being appointed by government and Muslim law being administered in the colonial judicial system. With the support of Gottlieb Leitner, registrar of the Punjab University College, Muslim parties used the emergent associations of Punjab civil society, including the Anjuman-i-Punjab (Lahore) and Anjuman-i-Islam (Lahore), to assert the indispensability of religious law. In doing so, they challenged the Anglo-Indian decision to prioritize customary law in the Punjab and advanced the religious group as the basic social unit of Punjab society. In Punjab public spaces, the relevance of Islam was proclaimed, challenging the professed Anglo-Indian distinction between private and public, religious and secular spheres. However, demands for qazi appointment and the administration of shari'at problematize well-rehearsed arguments about the relationships between family, community, state and religion in colonial Punjab. Only through an enquiry into the two decades after 1865 may later political campaigns for the application of shari'at be understood.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gilmartin, David, Empire and Islam: Punjab and the Making of Pakistan (California: University of California Press, 1988), pp. 169174Google Scholar; Gilmartin, David, ‘Customary Law and Shari'at in British Punjab’ in Ewing, Katherine P., ed., Shari'at and Ambiguity in South Asian Islam (California: University of California Press, 1988), pp. 4362.Google Scholar

2 Shari'at superseded customary law in matters of personal law for Muslims with the West Punjab Personal Law (Shari'at) Application Act of 1948. See Gilmartin, ‘Customary Law and Shari'at’, pp. 60–61.

3 Chatterjee, Partha, ‘On civil and political society in post-colonial democracies’ in Kaviraj, Sudipta and Khilnani, Sunil, eds, Civil Society: history and possibilities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 165178.Google Scholar

4 Chatterjee, ‘On civil and political society’, pp. 172–176.

5 Ibid., p. 174.

6 Robinson, Mark, ‘Civil Society and Ideological Contestation in India’ in Elliott, Carolyn M., ed., Civil Society and Democracy: A Reader (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 356363.Google Scholar

7 Cohn, Bernard S., Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), pp. 5775Google Scholar; Anderson, Michael R., ‘Islamic Law and the Colonial Encounter in British India’ in Arnold, David and Robb, Peter, eds, Institutions and Ideologies: a SOAS South Asian reader (Richmond: Curzon Press, 1993), pp. 165185.Google Scholar

8 Regulation 39 of the Bengal Code of 1793, cited in Yaduvansh, Uma, ‘The decline of the role of the qadis in India—1793–1876’, Studies in Islam: Quarterly Journal of the Indian Institute of Islamic Studies, New Delhi, 6 (1969), p. 156.Google Scholar

9 On the office of qazi in Islamic and Indo-Muslim history, see Kozlowski, Gregory C., Muslim Endowments and Society in British India (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp. 102106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Anderson, ‘Islamic Law and the Colonial Encounter’, pp. 170–175.

11 On the Anglo-Indian discussions preceding this act, see Yaduvansh, ‘The decline of the role of the qadis’, pp. 157–164.

12 Jalal, Ayesha, Self and Sovereignty: Individual and Community in South Asian Islam Since 1850 (London: Routledge, 2000), p. 148Google Scholar; Abbasi, Muhammad Yusuf, Muslim Politics and Leadership in South Asia 1876–92 (Islamabad: Institute of Islamic History, Culture and Civilization, 1981), pp. 110112Google Scholar; Yaduvansh, ‘The decline of the role of the qadis’, p. 170.

13 See for instance the petition of Mahmud Madad Hossain and other qazis in the district of Meerut, 11 September 1864, one of four Muslim petitions to the North Western Provinces’ government on Act XI of 1864 in Government of India Home (Judicial) Proceedings, nos. 48-108 of January 1865.

14 Petition of Hyder Jang Bahadur and others, Government of India Home (Judicial) Proceedings, no. 69 of February 1876.

15 J. D. Mayne, Secretary to the Government of Madras, to the Secretary to the Government of India, 13 October 1870, Government of India Home (Judicial) Proceedings, no. 1 of January 1871.

16 Memorandum by Mayo on Muhammadan qadis, 2 December 1870, cited in Yaduvansh, ‘The decline of the role of the qadis’, p. 167.

17 A. O. Hume, Secretary to the Government of India, to all provincial governments, 23 December 1870, Government of India Home (Judicial) Proceedings, no. 2 of January 1871.

18 Abbasi, Muslim Politics and Leadership, pp. 110–112.

19 S. C. Bayley, Secretary to the Government of Bengal, to the Secretary to the Government of India, 23 June 1871, Government of India Home (Judicial) Proceedings, no. 59 of February 1876.

20 Bill for the Voluntary Registration of Mahomedan Marriages and Divorces, Government of India Legislative Proceedings, Appendix M of January 1876.

21 Petition from Satar Sahib and seventy-six other Muhammadan inhabitants of Dratcharam, 10 July 1873, Government of India Home (Judicial) Proceedings, no. 72 of February 1876.

22 Petition of Kazi Mahomed Rukudeed, Poona, 9 December 1873, Government of India Home (Judicial) Proceedings, no. 74 of February 1876.

23 Gazette of India, 31 January 1880, part 5, pp. 20–21.

24 Memorial of the National Muhammadan Association, 17 February 1882, Selections from the Government of India Home Department No. CCV.: Correspondence on the Subject of the Education of the Muhammadan Community in British India and their Employment in the Public Service Generally (Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, 1886), pp. 237–244.

25 Ali, Amir, ‘A cry from the Indian Mohammedans’, The Nineteenth Century, 12 (August 1882), pp. 193215Google Scholar.

26 Memorial of the National Muhammadan Association, 17 February 1882, Selections from the Government of India Home Department No. CCV, pp. 237–244.

27 Jalal, Self and Sovereignty, pp. 148–153.

28 Secretary to the Government of the Punjab to the Secretary to the Government of India, 30 December 1864, Government of India Home (Judicial) Proceedings, nos. 48-108 of January 1865.

29 Gilmartin, Empire and Islam, pp. 13–18. On the development of customary law in the Punjab, see also Gilmartin, ‘Customary Law and Shari'at’ and Gledhill, A., ‘The compilation of customary laws in the Punjab in the nineteenth century’ in Glissen, J., La radaction des coutumes dans le passe et dans le present (Brussels: Institut de Sociologie de L'Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 1962), pp. 131164.Google Scholar

30 The first official compilation was Tupper's, C. L.Punjab Customary Law (Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, 1881)Google Scholar.

31 Grewal, J. S., In the By-Lanes of History: Some Persian Documents from a Punjab Town (Simla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study, 1975).Google Scholar

32 Grewal, In the By-Lanes of History, p. 66; Glover, William J., Making Lahore Modern: Constructing and Imagining a Colonial City (Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press, 2008), p. 15.Google Scholar

33 See for example Talewand Khan versus Musumat Khanzadee, Punjab Record (Civil Court), no. 5 of 1868.

34 Thankor Das versus Musumat Haji Begum, Punjab Record (Civil Court), no. 100 of 1868; Futeeh Khan versus Ali Khan, Punjab Record (Civil Court), no. 107 of 1868.

35 Punjab Laws Act, 28 March 1872, cited in Ram, Jaishi, The Punjab Civil Law Manual: containing notes on the Punjab Laws Act and enactments extended to the Punjab by that act, and also on the customary, Hindu and Muhammedan law as applicable to the Punjab (Lahore: ‘Tribune’ and Victoria Press, 1892), pp. 28.Google Scholar

36 Devi Suhai versus Azima, Punjab Record (Civil Court), no. 81 of 1874.

37 Gilmartin, ‘Customary Law and Shari'at’, pp. 45–50; Kozlowski, Gregory C., ‘Muslim Women and the Control of Property in North India’ in Sarkar, Sumit and Sarkar, Tamika, eds, Women and Social Reform in Modern India: A Reader (Ranikhet: Permanent Black, 2007), pp. 2843.Google Scholar

38 In addition to the above two studies, see Nelson, Matthew J., In the Shadow of Shari'ah: Islam, Islamic Law, and Democracy in Pakistan (London: Hurst and Company, 2011).Google Scholar

39 Boulnois, Charles and Rattigan, W. H., Notes on Customary Law as administered in the courts of the Punjab (Lahore: Albert Press, 1876), pp. 3745.Google Scholar

40 Ram, The Punjab Civil Law Manual, pp. xliii–xlv.

41 On the development of Urdu and particularly Punjabi literary cultures in later nineteenth century Punjab, see Mir, Farina, The Social Space of Language: Vernacular Culture in British Colonial Punjab (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010).Google Scholar

42 Report of the Anjuman-i-Punjab for the year 1865, Lahore Chronicle, 13 January 1866.

43 Sayyid Muhammad Latif, ‘A brief account of the history and operations of the Anjuman-i-Punjab from its foundation in 1865 to the end of the year 1877’, Supplement to the Civil and Military Gazette, Lahore, 12 January 1878.

44 Muhammad Latif, Sayyid, History of the Panjab from the remotest antiquity to the present time (Calcutta: Central Press, 1891)Google Scholar; Muhammad Latif, Sayyid, Lahore: its history, architectural remains and antiquities with an account of its modern institutions, inhabitants, their trade, customs, & c. (Lahore: New Imperial Press, 1892)Google Scholar. For biographical details, see also Ikram, S. M., Indian Muslims and Partition of India (New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers, 1992), pp. 210216.Google Scholar

45 Ikram, Indian Muslims and Partition of India, pp. 203–206; Latif, Lahore, pp. 345–348.

46 Latif, Lahore, pp. 347–351.

47 Proceedings of the Anjuman-i-Punjab, Selections from the Government of India Home Department No. CCV, pp. 312–313.

48 Resolution of the Anjuman-i-Punjab on the subject of religious education, Report by the Panjab Provincial Committee; with evidence taken before the Committee, and Memorials addressed to the Education Commission (Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, 1884), p. 585.

49 See for example Musumat Mehtab Bibi versus Musumat Shahzadi, Punjab Record (Civil Court), no. 56 of 1879; Boulnois and Rattigan, Notes on Customary Law, p. xvii; Ram, The Punjab Civil Law Manual, p. xiv.

50 Ram, The Punjab Civil Law Manual, pp. xliii–xlv.

51 Brief report of the progress of the Punjab University College, Punjab Education Proceedings, no. 2 of February 1871.

52 Scheme of examinations in law at the Punjab University College, Punjab Home Proceedings, no. 7 of March 1872.

53 Leitner, G. W., A lecture on the races of Turkey (both of Europe and Asia,) and the state of their education: being, principally, a contribution to Muhammadan education (Lahore: Indian Public Opinion Press, 1871), pp. 911.Google Scholar

54 Hunter, W. W., The Indian Musalmans, 2nd Edition (London: Trubner and Company, 1872), pp. 192196Google Scholar; Lyall, Alfred, Asiatic Studies: Religious and Social (London: John Murray, 1882), p. 275Google Scholar; Palgrave, W. G., Essays on Eastern Questions (London: Macmillan and Co., 1872), pp. 137140.Google Scholar

55 Leitner, A lecture on the races of Turkey, p. 11.

56 Leitner to Lytton, 28 January 1877, Lytton Papers (Mss. Eur. E218/30/23a); see also Leitner to Lytton, 12 December 1876, Lytton Papers (Mss. Eur. E218/30/23a). The Lytton collection (Mss. Eur. E218) is held at the India Office of the British Library.

57 G. W. Leitner, President of the Anjuman-i-Punjab, to the Government of the Punjab, 25 February 1880, Appendix to Punjab Home Proceedings April 1880. See also the report of G. W. Leitner on the Punjab University College, Punjab Home Proceedings, no. 2 of June 1877.

58 See the Akhbar-i-Anjuman-i-Punjab, 16 August 1881, Selections from the Vernacular Newspapers published in the Panjab, North-Western Provinces, Oudh, Central Provinces, and Berar (Allahabad: N.W.P. and Oudh Government Press, 1882), n.p.

59 Report of the Anjuman-i-Punjab for the year 1865, Lahore Chronicle, 13 January 1866.

60 C. M. Rivaz, Secretary to the Government of the Punjab, to the Secretary to the Government of India, 4 May 1871, Government of India Home (Judicial) Proceedings, no. 50 of February 1876.

61 Opinion of the Sunni Maulvis, Punjab Home Proceedings, no. 37 of April 1872.

62 Views of the Muhammadan members of the Senate, Punjab Home Proceedings, no. 37 of April 1872.

63 Churchill, Edward D., ‘Muslim Societies of the Punjab, 1860–1890’, Panjab Past and Present, 8 (1974), pp. 6991Google Scholar; Gerald Barrier, N., ‘Muslim Politics in the Punjab, 1870–1890’, Panjab Past and Present, 5 (1971), pp. 84127.Google Scholar

64 Churchill, ‘Muslim Societies of the Punjab’, pp. 77–78.

65 For an example of Barkat Ali's promotion of Muslim education at Lahore, see Muhammad Barkat Ali Khan, Secretary, Anjuman-i-Islam, to the Government of the Punjab, 1 August 1882, Selections from the Government of India Home Department No. CCV, pp. 314–318. In addition to seeking the extension of Muslim education at Lahore, Barkat Ali played an influential role in encouraging Punjabi Muslim elites to send their sons to the Muhammadan Anglo-Oriental College, Aligarh. See Aligarh Institute Gazette, 15 December 1891.

66 G. W. Leitner, President of the Anjuman-i-Punjab, to the Government of the Punjab, 25 February 1880, Appendix to Punjab Home Proceedings April 1880.

67 Muhammad Barkat Ali Khan, Secretary, Anjuman-i-Islam, to the Government of the Punjab, 2 March 1880, Appendix to Punjab Home Proceedings April 1880.

68 Minute of the Majlis Islami of Amritsar, Appendix to Punjab Home Proceedings April 1880.

69 Appendix to Punjab Home Proceedings April 1880. See for example the views of the Qazi Khel family resident near Peshawar.

70 Punjab Judicial Proceedings, no. 24 of January 1882.

71 Punjab Judicial Proceedings, no. 46 of June 1882, no. 5 of October 1882, no. 37 of October 1882, no. 2 of March 1883, no. 2 of June 1883, no. 3 of July 1883, and no. 37 of November 1883.

72 Extract from the report of the Oriental College, Lahore, for the year 1881–1882, Leitner, G. W., History of Indigenous Education in the Punjab Since Annexation and in 1882 (Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, 1882), part 2, pp. 116117.Google Scholar

73 Muhammad Barkat Ali Khan, Secretary, Anjuman-i-Islam, to the Government of the Punjab, 2 March 1880, Appendix to Punjab Home Proceedings April 1880.

74 See Appendix to Punjab Home Proceedings April 1880.

75 See for instance the views of Fakir Barkurdar, Jhang, and Muhammad Ziauddin, Sirsa, Appendix to Punjab Home Proceedings April 1880.

76 Proceedings of the Anjuman-i-Punjab, Selections from the Government of India Home Department No. CCV, pp. 312–313; Muhammad Barkat Ali Khan, Secretary, Anjuman-i-Islam, to the Government of the Punjab, 2 March 1880, Appendix to Punjab Home Proceedings April 1880.

77 See for example Musumat Ghasiti versus Musumat Bannu Jan, Punjab Record (Civil Court), no. 95 of 1884; Makhan versus Musumat Nur Bhari, Punjab Record (Civil Court), no. 116 of 1884; and Musumat Talia Bibi versus Musumat Budi, Punjab Record (Civil Court), no. 130 of 1884.

78 Muhammad Barkat Ali Khan, Secretary, Anjuman-i-Islam, to the Government of the Punjab, 1 August 1882, Selections from the Government of India Home Department No. CCV, pp. 314–318.

79 Proceedings of the Anjuman-i-Punjab, Selections from the Government of India Home Department No. CCV, pp. 312–313.

80 Jalal, Self and Sovereignty, pp. 148–153.

81 Lelyveld, David, Aligarh's First Generation: Muslim Solidarity in British India (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978), pp. 120Google Scholar; Jones, Kenneth W., ‘Religious Identity and the Indian Census’ in Gerald Barrier, N., The Census in British India: New Perspectives (New Delhi: Manohar, 1981), pp. 73102Google Scholar; Robinson, Francis, Separatism Among Indian Muslims: The Politics of the United Provinces’ Muslims, 1860–1923 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974), pp. 110.Google Scholar

82 Gopal, Ram, Indian Muslims: A Political History (1858–1947) (Bombay: Asia Publishing House, 1959), pp. 110.Google Scholar

83 Denzil Ibbetson, director of the Punjab census, would for example question official use of the religious group as a classificatory category in his Report on the Census of the Punjab taken on the 17th of February 1881 (Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, 1883), vol. 1, pp. 100–110.

84 Minault, Gail, Secluded Scholars: Women's Education and Muslim Social Reform in Colonial India (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 29Google Scholar; Chatterjee, Partha, The Nation and its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993), pp. 116157Google Scholar; Chatterjee, Partha, ‘The Nationalist Resolution of the Women's Question’ in Sangari, K., ed., Recasting Women: Essays in Indian Colonial History (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1999), pp. 233253.Google Scholar

85 Minault, Secluded Scholars, pp. 158–214.

86 Chatterjee, The Nation and its Fragments, pp. 3–13.

87 On the Anjuman-i-Himayat-i-Islam, see Anjuman-Himayat-i-Islam: A Short History & Account of its Constructive Activities (Lahore: Anjuman-i-Himayat-i-Islam, n.d.); Din, M. S., ‘Mohamedan Societies in the Punjab’, The Indian Magazine, (London: C. Kegan Paul, 1888), pp. 189192Google Scholar; Wasti, Syed Razi, Muslim Struggle for Freedom in British India (Delhi: Renaissance Publishing House, 1993), pp. 218229Google Scholar; and Minault, Secluded Scholars, pp. 175–182.

88 Din, ‘Mohamedan Societies in the Punjab’, p. 191.

89 Minault, Secluded Scholars, p. 176; Din, ‘Mohamedan Societies in the Punjab’, p. 191.

90 Punjab Judicial Proceedings, no. 3 of July 1883 and no. 43b of July 1883.

91 Report on Popular Education in the Punjab and its Dependencies for the Year 1885-86 (Lahore: Government Printing, 1886), pp. 25–26.