Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T23:36:56.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural descriptions in HIT – a problematic commitment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2001

Markus Graf
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich D-80802, Germanygrafm@psy.uni-muenchen.dewxs@psy.uni-muenchen.de www.paed.uni-muenchen.de/mip/PSYCH/wxs/wwwdocs/index.html
Werner X. Schneider
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich D-80802, Germanygrafm@psy.uni-muenchen.dewxs@psy.uni-muenchen.de www.paed.uni-muenchen.de/mip/PSYCH/wxs/wwwdocs/index.html

Abstract

Humphreys and Forde conceptualize object representations as structural descriptions, without discussing the implications of structural description models. We argue that structural description models entail two major assumptions – a part-structure assumption and an invariance assumption. The invariance assumption is highly problematic because it contradicts a large body of findings which indicate that recognition performance depends on orientation and size. We will delineate relevant findings and outline an alternative conception.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)