Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T02:12:27.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Copernican Question: Prognostication, Skepticism, and Celestial Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2013

Steven Vanden Broecke*
Affiliation:
Ghent University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Essay Review
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kuhn, Thomas S., The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957, pp. 206207Google Scholar, 209.

2 Henry, John, The Scientific Revolution and the Origins of Modern Science, 2nd edn, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002, p. 17Google Scholar.

3 Henry, op. cit. (2), pp. 19–20.

4 Vermij, Rienk, The Calvinist Copernicans, Amsterdam: Edita KNAW, 2002, p. 375Google Scholar.

5 As early as 1994, Westman used the precise phrase ‘Copernican question’ in referring to the present book. In 1986, however, his contribution to an edited volume still announced a forthcoming work called The Copernicans: Universities, Courts, and the Disciplines, 1543–1700. See Lindberg, David C. and Numbers, Ronald L., eds., God and Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1986, p. 488Google Scholar.

6 Cf. p. 19 col. b: ‘What distinguished the period 1572–1604 was that the initial challenge [to the traditional distinction between incorruptible celestial heavens and a changeable terrestrial realm] originated from a nontextual, nonhuman source: natural events in the “out there” – believed by contemporaries to be divinely caused – actually impinged on the perceptual apparatus of those who claimed to have observed something new’.

7 Steven Vanden Broecke, ‘The stars, the sublunary world, and the social body: on the specific rationality of early Renaissance prognostications’, in Charles Burnett and Dorian Greenbaum, eds., From Mash'allah to Kepler, forthcoming.