Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:16:44.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unexplained Deaths in Connecticut, 2002–2003:Failure to Consider Category A Bioterrorism Agents in Differential Diagnoses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

John P. Palumbo ,
James I. Meek ,
Darcy M. Fazio ,
Susan B. Turner ,
James L. Hadler  and
André N. Sofair
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: Recognition of bioterrorism-related infections by hospital and emergency department clinicians may be the first line of defense in a bioterrorist attack.

Methods: We identified unexplained infectious deaths consistent with the clinical presentation of anthrax, tularemia, smallpox, and botulism using Connecticut death certificates and hospital chart information. Minimum work-up criteria were established to assess the completeness of diagnostic testing.

Results: Of 4558 unexplained infectious deaths, 133 were consistent with anthrax (2.9%) and 6 (0.13%) with tularemia. None were consistent with smallpox or botulism. No deaths had anthrax or tularemia listed in the differential diagnosis or had disease-specific serology performed. Minimum work-up criteria were met for only 53% of cases.

Conclusions: Except for anthrax, few unexplained deaths in Connecticut could possibly be the result of the bioterrorism agents studied. In 47% of deaths from illnesses that could be anthrax, the diagnosis would likely have been missed. As of 2004, Connecticut physicians were not well prepared to intentionally or incidentally diagnose initial cases of anthrax or tularemia. More effective clinician education and surveillance strategies are needed to minimize the potential to miss initial cases in a bioterrorism attack. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2008;2:87–94)

Keywords

unexplained deathsCategory A bioterrorism agentselectronic death datainfectious diseasepublic health preparedness/response
Type
Original Research and Critical Analysis
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 87 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act. P Law No. 107-188. 116 Stat. 594 (2002).Google Scholar
2. Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act. P Law No. 109–417 (2006).Google Scholar
3.Cosgrove, S, Perl, T, Song, X, Sisson, S. Ability of physicians to diagnose and manage illness due to Category A bioterrorism agents. Arch Intern Med. 2005; 165: 2002–2006.Google Scholar
4.Nolte, KB, Lathrop, SL, Nashelsky, MB, et al“Med-X”: a medical examiner surveillance model for bioterrorism and infectious disease mortality. Hum Pathol. 2007; 38: 718.Google Scholar
5.Alexander, C, Larkin, L, Wynia, M. Physicians' preparedness for bioterrorism and other public health priorities. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13: 1238–1241.Google Scholar
6.Griffith, K, Mead, P, Armstrong, G, et alBioterrorism-related inhalational anthrax in an elderly woman, Connecticut, 2001. Emerging Infect Dis. 2003; 9: 681–688.Google Scholar
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidance for Fiscal Year 2002 Supplemental Funds for Public Health Preparedness and Response for Bioterrorism, Announcement No. 99051-Emergency Supplemental. February 15, 2002.Google Scholar
8.Hajjeh, RA, Relman, D, Cieslak, PR, et alSurveillance for unexplained deaths and critical illnesses due to possibly infectious causes, United States, 1995-1998. Emerging Infect Dis. 2002; 8: 145.Google Scholar
9.Arnon, S, Schechter, R, Inglesby, T, et alBotulinum toxin as a biological weapon. Medical and public health management. JAMA. 2001; 285: 1059–2081.Google Scholar
10.Dennis, D, Inglesby, T, Henderson, D, et alTularemia as a biological weapon. Medical and public health management. JAMA. 2001; 285: 2763–2773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Henderson, D, Inglesby, T, Bartlett, J, et alSmallpox as a biological weapon. Medical and public health management. JAMA. 1999; 281: 2127–2137.Google Scholar
12.Inglesby, T, O'Toole, T, Henderson, D, et alAnthrax as a biological weapon, 2002. Updated recommendations for management. JAMA. 2002; 287: 2236–2252.Google Scholar
13.Ketai, L, Alrahji, A, Hart, B, Enria, D, Mettler, F. Radiologic manifestations of potential bioterrorist agents of infection. Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 180: 565–575.Google Scholar
14.Penn, R. Francisella tularensis (tularemia). In: Mandell G, Bennett J, Dolin R, eds. Principles and Practice of Infectious Disease, Vol 2, 4th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1995 2060–2068.Google Scholar
15. US Bureau of Census. Annual Estimates of the Population for Counties in Connecticut: April 1, 2000, to July 1, 2004. Table CO-EST2004-01-09. Release Date April 14, 2005. http://www.census.gov/popest/counties/CO-EST2004-01.html.Google Scholar
16.Jernigan, J, Stephens, D, Ashford, D, et alBioterrorism-related inhalational anthrax: the first 10 cases reported in the United States. Emerging Infect Dis. 2001; 7: 933–944.Google Scholar
17.Campbell, S, Marrie, T, Anstey, R, Ackroyd-Stolarz, S, Dickinsin, G. Utility of blood cultures in the management of adults with community acquired pneumonia discharged from the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2003; 20: 521–523.Google Scholar
18.Begier, E, Barrett, N, Mshar, P, Johnson, D, Hadler, J. Gram-positive rod surveillance for early anthrax detection. Team CBFER. Emerging Infect Dis. 2005; 11: 1483–1486.Google Scholar
19.Hadler, J, Siniscalchi, A, Dembek, Z. Hospital admission syndromic surveillance–Connecticut, October 2001–June 2004. MMWR. 2005; 54 Suppl169–173.Google Scholar
20.Nolte, K. Infectious disease pathology and the autopsy. Clin Infect Dis. 2002; 34: 130–131.Google Scholar