Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T08:08:08.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aspects of selection for feed efficiency in meat producing poultry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2013

O.W. WILLEMS*
Affiliation:
Centre for the Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada
S.P. MILLER
Affiliation:
Centre for the Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada
B.J. WOOD
Affiliation:
Centre for the Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada
*
Corresponding author: owillems@uoguelph.ca
Get access

Abstract

Over the last five years, the costs of poultry feed ingredients have increased substantially. This has been due to an increased use of corn for ethanol production and a greater overall global feed grain demand. Across the poultry industry this has led to higher production costs and reaffirmed the importance of feed efficiency on profitability. The effect that an increase in feed costs has on profitability is a clear driver for the selection for birds with better feed efficiency. Feed efficiency selection can be achieved using a number of different analytical methods. Selection for feed conversion ratio (FCR) has been used to improve feed efficiency with success but using a ‘ratio’ trait has mathematical limitations because selection pressure tends to be placed on the component traits of FCR in a non-linear manner. Another measure, residual feed intake (RFI) shows moderate to high heritability and does not have the mathematical limitations associated with FCR. RFI has little to no correlation with production traits and this indicates that genetic improvement of RFI within a selection index can be done without the confounding issues inherent with FCR. Improvements in RFI or FCR have a favourable effect on environmental emissions and decreases the environmental impact of poultry production. The current global production of ammonia, CH4, and N2O by the poultry industry is significant, at levels of 2.1, 29.44 and 279 million tonnes CO2eq, respectively. Reductions in emissions can be achieved via improvements in feed efficiency by lowering amounts of manure excreted and decreasing emitted by-products such as ammonia and greenhouse gases (N2O, CO2 and CH4). Consequently, improvements in feed efficiency can not only increase profitability of the poultry industries by lowering production costs but also decrease environmental impact by reducing environmental emissions.

Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AGGREY, S., KARNUAH, A., SEBASTIAN, B. and ANTHONY, N. (2010) Genetic properties of feed efficiency parameters in meat-type chickens. Genetics Selection Evolution 42: 25-29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ARTHUR, P., RENAND, G. and KRAUSS, D. (2001) Genetic and phenotypic relationships among different measures of growth and feed efficiency in young Charolais bulls. Livestock Production Science 68: 131-139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BERRY, D. and CROWLEY, J. (2012) Residual intake and body weight gain: A new measure of efficiency in growing cattle. Journal of Animal Science 90: 109-115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BOTTJE, W. and CARSTENS, G. (2009) Association of mitochondrial function and feed efficiency in poultry and livestock species. Journal of Animal Science 87: 48-63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BYERLY, T.C. (1941) Feed and other costs of producing market eggs (Vol. A1). Maryland: University of Maryland, Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
CAMPO, J. and RODRIGUEZ, M. (1990) Relative efficiency of selection methods to improve a ratio of two traits in Tribolium. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 80: 343-348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CASE, L., MILLER, S. and WOOD, B. (2010) Genetic parameters of feed efficiency traits in the turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Leipzig, CD ROM communication, 0221.Google Scholar
CASE, L.A., WOOD, B.J. and MILLER, S.P. (2012) The genetic parameters of feed efficiency and its component traits in the turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). Genetics Selection Evolution 44: 2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CHARLES, D. (1986) Temperature for broilers. World's Poultry Science Journal 42: 249-258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DAVIS, N., PRESCOTT, N., SAVORY, C. and WATHES, C. (1999) Preferences of growing fowls for different light intensities in relation to age, strain and behaviour. Animal Welfare 8: 193-203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DE VERDAL, H., NARCY, A., BASTIANELLI, D., CHAPUIS, H., MEME, N., LE BIHAN-DUVAL, E. and MIGNON-GRASTEAU, S. (2010) Selection for excretion traits in chicken. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Leipzig, CD ROM communication, 0123.Google Scholar
DE VERDAL, H., NARCY, A., BASTIANELLI, D., CHAPUIS, H., MEME, N., URVOIX, S., LE BIHAN-DUVAL, E. and MIGNON-GRASTEAU, S. (2011) Improving the efficiency of feed utilization in poultry by selection. 2. Genetic parameters of excretion traits and correlations with anatomy of the gastro-intestinal tract and digestive efficiency. BMC genetics 12: 71-81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DONOHUE, M. and CUNNINGHAM, D. (2009) Effects of grain and oilseed prices on the costs of US poultry production. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 18: 325-337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DRANSFIELD, E. and SOSNICKI, A. (1999) Relationship between muscle growth and poultry meat quality. Poultry Science 78: 743-746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EL-DEEN, M.B., EL TAHAWY, W., ATTIA, Y. and MEKY, M. (2009) Inheritance of age at sexual maturity and its relationships with some production traits of Japanese quail. Egyptian Poultry Science 28: 1217-1232.Google Scholar
EMMERSON, D. (1997) Commercial approaches to genetic selection for growth and feed conversion in domestic poultry. Poultry Science 76: 1121-1125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FAMULA, T. (1990) The equivalence of two linear methods for the improvement of traits expressed as ratios. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 79: 853-856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FAOSTAT, (2009) Livestock Primary Production Data. Retrieved from http://faostat.fao.org.Google Scholar
FIALA, N. (2008) Meeting the demand: An estimation of potential future greenhouse gas emissions from meat production. Ecological Economics 67: 412-419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GATES, R., CASEY, K., WHEELER, E., XIN, H. and PESCATORE, A. (2008) US broiler ammonia emissions inventory model. Atmospheric Environment 42: 3342-3350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GROEN, A., JIANG, X., EMMERSON, D. and VEREIJKEN, A. (1998) A deterministic model for the economic evaluation of broiler production systems. Poultry Science 77: 925-933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GUNSETT, F. (1984) Linear index selection to improve traits defined as ratios. Journal of Animal Science 59: 1185-1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GUY, G., ROUSSELOT-PAILLEY, D. and ROUVIER, R. (1998) Growth description of female mule ducks. Annales de Zootechnie 47: 303-310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HAVENSTEIN, G., FERKET, P. and QURESHI, M. (2003) Growth, livability, and feed conversion of 1957 versus 2001 broilers when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets. Poultry Science 82: 1500-1508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HAVENSTEIN, G., FERKET, P., SCHEIDELER, S. and LARSON, B. (1994) Growth, livability, and feed conversion of 1957 vs 1991 broilers when fed" typical" 1957 and 1991 broiler diets. Poultry Science 73: 1785-1794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HAVENSTEIN, G.B., FERKET, P.R., GRIMES, J.L., QURESHI, M.A. and NESTOR, K.E. (2007) Comparison of the performance of 1966-versus 2003-type turkeys when fed representative 1966 and 2003 turkey diets: Growth rate, livability, and feed conversion. Poultry Science 86: 232-240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HILL, R. and AZAIN, M. (2009) Growth and development symposium: The molecular basis for feed efficiency. Journal of Animal Science 87: 39-40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HOWIE, J., AVENDANO, S., TOLKAMP, B. and KYRIAZAKIS, I. (2011) Genetic parameters of feeding behavior traits and their relationship with live performance traits in modern broiler lines. Poultry Science 90: 1197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
JIANG, X., GROEN, A. and BRASCAMP, E. (1998) Economic values in broiler breeding. Poultry Science 77: 934-943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
JOHNSON, D.E. and WARD, G.M. (1996) Estimates of animal methane emissions. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 42: 133-141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KENNEDY, B., VAN DE WERF, J. and MEUWISSEN, T. (1993) Genetics and statistical properties of residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 71: 3239-3250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KHALDARI, M., PAKDEL, A., MEHRABANI YEGANE, H., NEJATI JAVAREMI, A. and BERG, P. (2010) Response to selection and genetic parameters of body and carcass weights in Japanese quail selected for 4-week body weight. Poultry Science 89: 1834-1841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KOCH, R.M., SWIGER, L., CHAMBERS, D. and GREGORY, K. (1963) Efficiency of feed use in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 22: 486-494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KONCA, Y., KIRKPINAR, F. and ABUK, M. (2009) Effects of dietary ascorbic acid on blood haematological profile, serum biochemical components and tonic immobility reaction of male turkeys under summer condition. The Journal of Poultry Science 46: 105-111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEENSTRA, F.R. and PIT, R. (1987) Fat deposition in a broiler sire strain. Poultry Science 66: 193-202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LESSCHEN, J., VAN DEN BERG, M., WESTHOEK, H., WITZKE, H. and OENEMA, O. (2011) Greenhouse gas emission profiles of European livestock sectors. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166: 16-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LUITING, P. (1990) Genetic variation of energy partitioning in laying hens: causes of variation in residual feed consumption. World's Poultry Science Journal 46: 133-152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LUITING, P. (1999) The role of genetic variation in feed intake and its physiological aspects: Results from selection experiments, in: VANDERHEIDE, D., HUISMAN, E.A., KANIS, A., OSSE, J.W.M. & VERSTEGEN, M.W.A. (Eds) Regulation of feed intake, pp. 75-88 (CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK).Google Scholar
LUITING, P., SCHRAMA, J., VAN DER HEL, W. and URFF, E. (1991) Metabolic differences between White Leghorns selected for high and low residual food consumption. British Poultry Science 32: 763-782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MELO, J.E., ROMANO, E., CANET, Z. and MIQUEL, M.C. (2006) Genetic parameters of growth and feed efficiency in a free-range broiler stock. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, CD ROM communication, 336-441.Google Scholar
MILES, D., OWENS, P. and ROWE, D. (2006) Spatial variability of litter gaseous flux within a commercial broiler house: ammonia, nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide, and methane. Poultry Science 85: 167-172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NAHASHON, S., ADEFOPE, N., AMENYENU, A. and WRIGHT, D. (2005) Effects of dietary metabolizable energy and crude protein concentrations on growth performance and carcass characteristics of French guinea broilers. Poultry Science 84: 337-344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NIDRI, A., MIGNON-GRASTEAU, S., SELLIER, N., TIXIER-BOICHARD, M. and BEAUMONT, C. (2006) Genetic relationships between feed conversion ratio, growth curve and body composition in slow-growing chickens. British Poultry Science 47: 273-280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NKRUMAH, J., BASARAB, J., WANG, Z., LI, C., PRICE, M., OKINE, E., CREWS, D. and MOORE, S. (2007) Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feed intake and different measures of feed efficiency with growth and carcass merit of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 85: 2711-2720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
OENEMA, O., WRAGE, N., VELTHOF, G., GROENIGEN, J.W., DOLFING, J. and KUIKMAN, P. (2005) Trends in global nitrous oxide emissions from animal production systems. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 72: 51-65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PAKDEL, A., VAN ARENDONK, J.A.M., VEREIJKEN, A.L.J. and BOVENHUIS, H. (2005) Genetic parameters of ascites-related traits in broilers: Correlations with feed efficiency and carcase traits. British Poultry Science 46: 43-53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PINGEL, H. (2011) Results of selection for breast muscle percentage and feed conversion ratio in Pekin ducks. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 27: 769-776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PYM, R. and NICHOLLS, P. (1979) Selection for food conversion in broilers: Direct and correlated responses to selection for body weight gain, food consumption and food conversion ratio. British Poultry Science 20: 73-86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RETAILLEAU, R. (1999) Comparison of the growth and body composition of 3 types of ducks: Pekin, Muscovy and Mule. Proceedings of the 1st World Conference on Waterfowl, Taichung, p. 597-602.Google Scholar
ROMERO, L.F., ZUIDHOF, M.J., RENEMA, R.A., NAEIMA, A. and ROBINSON, F.E. (2009a) Characterization of energetic efficiency in adult broiler breeder hens. Poultry Science 88: 227-235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ROMERO, L.F., ZUIDHOF, M.J., RENEMA, R.A., NAEIMA, A.N. and ROBINSON, F.E. (2009b) Effects of maternal energetic efficiency on egg traits, chick traits, broiler growth, yield, and meat quality. Poultry Science 88: 236-245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SCHMIT, T.M., VERTERAMO, L. and TOMEK, W.G. (2009) Implications of growing biofuels demands on Northeast livestock feed costs. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 38: 200-212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHENKEL, F., MILLER, S. and WILTON, J. (2004) Genetic parameters and breed differences for feed efficiency, growth, and body composition traits of young beef bulls. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 84: 177-185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SKINNER-NOBLE, D. and TEETER, R. (2003) Components of feed efficiency in broiler breeding stock: energetics, performance, carcass composition, metabolism, and body temperature. Poultry Science 82: 1080-1090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SWENNEN, Q., JANSSENS, G., DECUYPERE, E. and BUYSE, J. (2004) Effects of substitution between fat and protein on feed intake and its regulatory mechanisms in broiler chickens: energy and protein metabolism and diet-induced thermogenesis. Poultry Science 83: 1997-2004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
TU, X., DU, S., TANG, L., XIN, H. and WOOD, B. (2011) A real-time automated system for monitoring individual feed intake and body weight of group housed turkeys. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 75: 313-320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TUFARELLI, V., DARIO, M. and LAUDADIO, V. (2007) Effect of xylanase supplementation and particle-size on performance of guinea fowl broilers fed wheat-based diets. International Journal of Poultry Science 6: 302-307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VAN BEBBER, J. and MERCER, J. (1994) Selection for efficiency in broilers: A comparison of residual feed intake with feed conversion ratio. Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Guelph, p. 53-60.Google Scholar
VAN DER WERF, J.H.J. (2004) Is it useful to define residual feed intake as a trait in animal breeding programmes? Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44: 405-409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VARKOOHI, S., MORADI SHAHR BABAK, M., PAKDEL, A., NEJATI JAVAREMI, A., ZAGHARI, M. and KAUSE, A. (2010) Response to selection for feed conversion ratio in Japanese quail. Poultry Science 89: 1590-1598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VARKOOHI, S., PAKDEL, A., MORADI SHAHR BABAK, M., NEJATI JAVAREMI, A., KAUSE, A. and ZAGHARI, M. (2011) Genetic parameters for feed utilization traits in Japanese quail. Poultry Science 90: 42-47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VERGE, X.P.C., DYER, J.A., DESJARDINS, R.L. and WORTH, D. (2009) Long-term trends in greenhouse gas emissions from the Canadian poultry industry. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 18: 210-222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WANG, S.Y. and HUANG, D.J. (2005) Assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from poultry enteric fermentation. Asian-Autralasian Journal of Animal Science 18: 873-878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WOOD, B.J. (2009) Calculating economic values for turkeys using a deterministic production model. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 89: 201-213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar