Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T11:42:20.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The physician–patient relationship in treatment decision making at the end of life: A pilot study of cancer patients in a Southeast Asian society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2012

Zheng Jie Marc Ho*
Affiliation:
Singapore General Hospital, National Cancer Centre, Singapore Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Centre, Singapore
Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
Affiliation:
Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Centre, Singapore
Cynthia Goh
Affiliation:
Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Centre, Singapore
Chung Pheng Alethea Yee
Affiliation:
Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Centre, Singapore
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Zheng Jie Marc Ho, Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Centre, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore 169610. E-mail:marc.ho@mohh.com.sg

Abstract

Background:

The traditional relationship between patient and physician in East Asian society has often been described as “paternalistic.” However, in an increasingly Westernized world, our knowledge of how patients perceive the role of the physician in their decision making regarding treatment is lacking.

Objective:

This article is part of a larger pilot study exploring the patient–physician dynamic on decision making among Southeast Asian palliative cancer patients. We explore: (1) influence of physicians, (2) the effect of symptom control and quality of life, and (3) dynamics and communication of physicians.

Design:

An interviewer-administered questionnaire was distributed, with 18 questions related to physician–patient interactions asked. Most questions followed a three point scale: “agree,” “neutral,” and “disagree,” and spontaneous answers beyond this framework were recorded.

Setting/Participants:

Thirty patients from the palliative care service were interviewed, including inpatients at Singapore General Hospital and those attending outpatient clinics at the National Cancer Centre.

Results:

Patients said that they themselves and their physicians were the main influences (80% each), over family members (48.3%). Some patients (26.7%) felt that symptoms were not well controlled, and 42.9% identified low mood or anxiety. Some patients (44.8%) felt that their condition had an effect on decision making. Most patients (89.3%) had a good relationship with the staff, with >80% being comfortable with discussions held. However, 20.7% of patients felt dissatisfied with the information provided, and 62.1% of patients wanted full disclosure of information.

Significance of results:

Patients appeared to place highest regard in both autonomy and physician input in making decisions, accompanied by an increased desire for more information. These reflect deviation away from traditional thinking of paternalistic doctoring in East Asia.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benbassat, J., Pilpel, D. & Tidhar, M. (1998). Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: A review of published surveys. Behavioral Medicine, 24, 8188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackhall, L.J., Murphy, S.T., Frank, G., et al. (1995). Ethnicity and attitudes towards patient autonomy. Journal of the American Medical Association, 274, 820825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blank, R.H. (2011). End-of-life decision making across cultures. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 39, 201214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruera, E., Neumann, C.M., Mazzocato, C., et al. (2000). Attitudes and beliefs of palliative care physicians regarding communication with terminally ill cancer patients. Palliative Medicine, 14, 287298.Google Scholar
Cassileth, B.R., Zupkis, R.V., Sutton-Smith, K., et al. (1980). Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Annals of Internal Medicine, 92, 832836.Google Scholar
Clarke, G., Hall, R.T. & Rosencrance, G. (2004). Physician-patient relations: No more models. American Journal of Bioethics, 4, 1619.Google Scholar
Guo, Z. (1995). Chinese Confucian culture and the medical ethical tradition. Journal of Medical Ethics, 21, 239246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Low, J.A., Ng, .C., Yap, K.B., et al. (2000). End-of-life issues—preferences and choices of a group of elderly Chinese subjects attending a day care centre in Singapore. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 29, 5056.Google Scholar
Pickard, A.Simon, Wilke, Caitlyn, T., et al. (2007). Health using the EQ-5D in studies of cancer. PharmacoEconomics, 25, 365384.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Osorio, C.A. & Dominguez-Cherit, G. (2008). Medical decision making: Paternalism versus patient-centered (autonomous) care. Current Opinions on Critical Care, 14, 708713.Google Scholar
Ruhnke, G.W., Wilson, S.R., Akamatsu, T., et al. (2000). Ethical decision making and patient autonomy: A comparison of physicians and patients in Japan and the United States. Chest, 118, 11721182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singapore Department of Statistics. (2010a). Population Trends 2010. http://www.singstat.gov.sg/pubn/popn/population2010.pdf:1-5.Google Scholar
Singapore Department of Statistics. (2010b). Population Trends 2010. http://www.singstat.gov.sg/pubn/popn/c2010sr1/cop2010sr1.pdf:8-13.Google Scholar
Sittisombut, S. & Inthong, S. (2009). Surrogate decision-maker for end-of-life care in terminally ill patients at Chiang Mai University Hospital, Thailand. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 15, 119125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, T.K.,Teo, F.C.,Wong, K., et al. (1993). Cancer: To tell or not to tell? Singapore Medical Journal, 34, 202203.Google ScholarPubMed