Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T07:07:27.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Classification of Quasars and Stars by Supervised and Unsupervised Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2013

Yanxia Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China email: zyx@bao.ac.cn, yzhao@bao.ac.cn
Yongheng Zhao
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100012, China email: zyx@bao.ac.cn, yzhao@bao.ac.cn
Hongwen Zheng
Affiliation:
Mathematics and Physics Department, North China Electronic Power University, Beijing 102206, China
Xue-bing Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Targeting quasar candidates is always an important task for large spectroscopic sky survey projects. Astronomers never give up thinking out effective approaches to separate quasars from stars. The previous methods on this issue almost belong to supervised methods or color-color cut. In this work, we compare the performance of a supervised method – Support Vector Machine (SVM)– with that of an unsupervised method one-class SVM. The performance of SVM is better than that of one-class SVM. But one-class SVM is an unsupervised algorithm which is helpful to recognize rare or mysterious objects. Combining supervised methods with unsupervised methods is effective to improve the performance of a single classifier.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013