Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:39:12.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studying the Progenitors of Type Ia Supernovae via Lensing with the Kepler Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2013

Rosanne Di Stefano*
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., Cambridge MA 02138 email: rd@cfa.harvard.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Every model for the progenitors of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) requires that binaries pass through an epoch during which a white dwarf (WD) orbits a non-degenerate star. Depending on the mass of the WD, the radius of its companion, and the orbital separation, the WD may lens its companion. The lensing event would be an antitransit, an increase in light from the companion that can rise to the level of a percent or more, during an interval of hours. Antitransits are periodic. By studying them we can determine the properties of both the WD and its companion, as well as the characteristics of the orbit. Lensing events of this type are almost certain to be observed by the Kepler mission, while some can even be detected by ground-based surveys. Antitransits and transits will both provide valuable insight into the end states of common envelope evolution and of stable mass transfer, resolving issues that must be understood before we can fully unravel the progenitor puzzle.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2013

References

Di Stefano, R. 2011, AJ, 141, 142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Stefano, R. 2010, American Institute of Physics Conference Series, 1314, 196Google Scholar
Di Stefano, R. 2012, in preparationGoogle Scholar
Farmer, A. J. & Agol, E. 2003, ApJ, 592, 1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, S., et al. 1995, MNRAS, 273, 731Google Scholar
Rowe, J. F., et al. 2010, ApJL, 713, L150Google Scholar
Sahu, K. C. & Gilliland, R. L. 2003, ApJ, 584, 1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kerkwijk, et al. 2010, ApJ, 715, 51CrossRefGoogle Scholar