Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T13:58:34.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Economic Development and Gender Equality: Is There a Gender Kuznets Curve?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2013

Joshua Eastin
Affiliation:
Portland State University in fall 2013 as an assistant professor of environmental politics and policy, Email: jeastin@u.washington.edu.
Aseem Prakash
Affiliation:
Professor for the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Washington, Seattle, Email: aseem@u.washington.edu.
Get access

Abstract

This research note examines the relationship between economic development and gender equality. Drawing on the concept of the Kuznets curve, the authors hypothesize that the relationship between economic development and gender inequality is curvilinear (S shaped), with three distinct stages. In the first stage, economic development improves gender equality because it enables greater female labor-force participation. An independent income stream increases women's intrahousehold bargaining power. The opportunity to develop human capital confers greater political and social recognition. In the second stage, labor-force stratification and gender discrimination encourage divergent male/female income trajectories, which decrease the opportunity costs of female labor-force withdrawal and lend traction to social resistance against burgeoning gender norms. Consequently, there is a deceleration in initial equality gains. In the final stage, gender equality again improves, as greater educational participation and technological advancement provide new employment opportunities for women, increase the opportunity costs of staying home, and encourage the evolution of new social institutions and norms that overcome prior discriminatory practices. The authors find support for this argument in statistical tests of the relationship between economic development and gender equality on a panel of 146 developing countries for the period 1980–2005. They employ four indicators that reflect distinct dimensions of women's political, social, and economic status. They find economic development positively influences gender equality when per capita incomes are below $8,000–$10,000. These equality gains level off or decline slightly in the second stage, from $8,000–10,000 to about $25,000–$30,000. Beyond this level, economic development is again associated with improvements in gender equality. The key implication is that the effect of economic development on gender equality is contingent on the level of development. Policymakers and social activists should develop policy correctives to ensure that economic development confers improvements in gender equality across phases of development.

Type
Research Note
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)