Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T20:38:45.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

L1-SMOOTHING FOR THE ORNSTEIN–UHLENBECK SEMIGROUP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2012

K. Ball
Affiliation:
Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, U.K. (email: kmb120205@googlemail.com)
F. Barthe
Affiliation:
Institut de Mathématiques de Toulouse (CNRS UMR 5219), Université Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse cedex 09, France (email: barthe@math.univ-toulouse.fr)
W. Bednorz
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, University of Warsaw, Banacha 2, 02-097 Warszawa, Poland (email: W.Bednorz@mimuw.edu.pl)
K. Oleszkiewicz
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, University of Warsaw, Banacha 2, 02-097 Warszawa, Poland Institute of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Śniadeckich 8, 00-956 Warszawa, Poland (email: K.Oleszkiewicz@mimuw.edu.pl)
P. Wolff
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Śniadeckich 8, 00-956 Warszawa, Poland (email: pwolff@mimuw.edu.pl)
Get access

Abstract

Given a probability density, we estimate the rate of decay of the measure of the level sets of its evolutes by the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck semigroup. The rate is faster than what follows from the preservation of mass and Markov’s inequality.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University College London 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Beckner, W., Inequalities in Fourier analysis. Ann. of Math. (2) 102(1) (1975), 159182.Google Scholar
[2]Bonami, A., Etude des coefficients de Fourier des fonctions de L p(G). Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 20(2) (1971), 335402.Google Scholar
[3]Nelson, E., The free Markoff field. J. Funct. Anal. 12 (1973), 211227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Oleszkiewicz, K., On Eaton’s property (in preparation).Google Scholar
[5]Talagrand, M., A conjecture on convolution operators, and a non-Dunford–Pettis operator on L 1. Israel J. Math. 68(1) (1989), 8288.Google Scholar