Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T10:52:15.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Eastern Religions and Attitude toward Direct Democracy in Taiwan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2012

Wen-Chun Chang*
Affiliation:
National Taipei University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Wen-Chun Chang, Department of Public Finance, National Taipei University, 151 University Road, San-shia, New Taipei City, Taiwan. E-mail: wchang@mail.ntpu.edu.tw

Abstract

While direct democracy is a practical form of self-determination in the political process, the value system stemming from a given country's social and cultural factors has been argued to be critical in shaping citizens' preferences for a political institution. This article investigates the relationship between religion and the attitude toward direct democracy for the case of Taiwan, an East Asian country where most people are affiliated with Buddhism, Taoism, and folk religions. Unlike Western countries dominated by Judeo-Christianity, some arguments indicate that value systems emphasizing collectivities, social cohesion, and obedience to authorities in East Asian countries are inconsistent with the fundamental value of democratic norms based on individual rights and self-determination. If this is the case, then social and cultural factors are incompatible to democratic development in East Asian societies. Nevertheless, this argument has not been adequately supported by empirical studies. By using data from the Taiwan Social Change Survey 2004, the findings from this study suggest that affiliations with Buddhism, Taoism, and folk religions are positively associated with the agreement of using a referendum in political decision making. The ideological orientation stemming from these Eastern religions plays an important role in enhancing democratic values and the positive attitudes toward referendum.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aghion, P., Alesina, A., and Trebbi, F.. 2004. “Endogenous Political Institutions.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119:565612.Google Scholar
Alesina, A., Baqir, R., and Hoxby, C.. 2004. “Political Jurisdictions in Heterogeneous Communities.” Journal of Political Economy 112:348396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R.J. 1999. “Determinants of Democracy.” Journal of Political Economy 107:S158S183.Google Scholar
Berling, J.A. 1982. “Asian Religions.” Focus on Asian Studies 2:511.Google Scholar
Billings, D.B., and Scott, S.L.. 1994. “Religion and Political Legitimation.” Annual Review of Sociology 20:173201.Google Scholar
Bowler, S., Donovan, T., and Karp, J.. 2002. “When Might Institutions Change? Elite Support for Direct Democracy in Three Nations.” Political Research Quarterly 55:731754.Google Scholar
Bowler, S., Donovan, T., and Karp, J.. 2007. “Enraged or Engaged? Preferences for Direct Citizen Participation in Affluent Democracies.” Political Research Quarterly 60:351362.Google Scholar
Chen, C.-W. 2004. “The First Referendum and Its Effects on Political Development in Taiwan.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy 1:4372.Google Scholar
Cronin, T.E. 1989. “Direct Democracy.” In The Politics of Initiative, Referendum and Recall. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Bürklin, and Drummond, R.J., Bürklin, W., and Drummond, A.. 2001. “Public Opinion and Direct Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 12:141153.Google Scholar
De Koster, W., and Van Der Waal, J.. 2007. “Cultural Value Orientations and Christian Religiosity: On Moral Traditionalism, Authoritarianism, and Their Implications for Voting Behavior.” International Political Science Review 28:451467.Google Scholar
Dhammanada, K.S. 2002. What Buddhists Believe? Buddhist Missionary Society Malaysia.Google Scholar
Diamond, L., and Plattner, M.F.. 1998. Democracy in East Asia. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Donovan, T., and Karp, J.A.. 2006. “Popular Support for Direct Democracy.” Party Politics 12:671688.Google Scholar
Ellison, C.G., and Sherkat, D.E.. 1993. “Obedience and Autonomy: Religion and Parental Values Reconsidered.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 32:313329.Google Scholar
Feld, L.P., and Kirchgässner, G.. 2001. “Does Direct Democracy Reduce Public Debt? Evidence from Swiss Municipalities.” Public Choice 109:347370.Google Scholar
Feld, L.P., and Matsusaka, J.G.. 2003. “Budget Referendums and Government Spending: Evidence from Swiss Cantons.” Journal of Public Economics 87:27032724.Google Scholar
Feld, L.P., Schaltegger, C.S., and Schnellenbach, J.. 2008. “On Government Centralization and Fiscal Referendums.” European Economic Review 52:611645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, J.S., and Soper, C.. 2007. “The Effect of Confucian Values on Support for Democracy and Human Rights in Taiwan.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy 3:143154.Google Scholar
Frey, B. 1997. “A Constitution for Knaves Crowds Out Civic Virtues.” Economic Journal 107:10431053.Google Scholar
Frey, B., Kucher, M., and Stutzer, A.. 2001. “Outcome, Process and Power in Direct Democracy: New Econometric Results.” Public Choice 107:271293.Google Scholar
Frey, B., and Stutzer, A.. 2006. “Direct Democracy: Designing a Living Constitution.” In Democratic Constitutional Design and Public Policy, Analysis and Evidence, eds., Congleton, R.D., and Swedenborg, B.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, E. 1994. “Democratization: Generalizing the East Asian Experiences.” In The Politics of Democratization: Generalizing East Asian Experiences, ed., Friedman, E.Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. 1995. “Confucianism and Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 6:2033.Google Scholar
Gethin, R. 1998. Foundations of Buddhism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldin, C. 2006. “The Quiet Revolution that Transformed Women's Employment, Education, and Family.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings. 96:121.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. 2000. Econometric Analysis. Princeton: NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hibbing, J., and Theiss-Morse, E.. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hibbing, J., and Theiss-Morse, E.. 2001. “Process Preferences and American Politics.” American Political Science Review 95:145154.Google Scholar
Hsieh, J. F.-S. 2000. “East Asian Culture and Democratic Transition, With Special Reference to the Case of Taiwan.” Journal of Asian and African Studies 35:2942.Google Scholar
Hsu, Y.-M. 2004. “Referendums and Representative Democracy: A Case Study of Taiwan.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy 1:125.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University Of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. 2000. “Culture and Democracy.” In Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress, eds., Harrison, Lawrence E., and Huntington, Samuel. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Jordan, D.K. 1985. Gods, Ghosts, and Ancestors: Folk Religion in a Taiwanese Village. Taipei: Caves Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Kirkland, R. 2004. Taoism: The Enduring Tradition. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, P.R. 2003. “Religion and the State in Post-War Taiwan.” China Quarterly 174:395412.Google Scholar
Kuo, C. 2002. Democracy and Religion in Taiwan. APSA Conference Group on Taiwan Studies. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Kuo, C. 2004. “Religion and Democracy in Taiwan: A Statistical Analysis.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Laliberté, A. 2001. “Buddhist Organizations and Democracy in Taiwan.” American Asian Review 19:97129.Google Scholar
Laliberté, A. 2004. The Politics of Buddhist Organizations in Taiwan: 1989–2003, New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Landes, D. 1998. The Wealth and Poverty of Nations, New York, NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Legge, J. 2004. The Analects of Confucius, eBooks@Adelaide.Google Scholar
Lin, J.-W. 2004. “Taiwan's Referendum Act and the Stability of the Status Quo.” Issues & Studies 40:119153.Google Scholar
Lind, E.A., and Tyler, T.R.. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53:69105.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. 1981. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopins University Press.Google Scholar
Madsen, R. 2007. Democracy's Dharma: Religious Renaissance and Political Development in Taiwan. Berkeley, CA: University Of California Press.Google Scholar
Marsh, R.M. 2002. “National Identity and Ethnicity in Taiwan: Some Trends In the 1990s.” In Memories of the Future: National Identity Issues and the Search for a New Taiwan, ed., Corcuff, Stephane. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Matsusaka, J. 2005a. “The Eclipse of Legislatures: Direct Democracy in the 21st Century.” Public Choice 124:157177.Google Scholar
Matsusaka, J. 2005b. “Direct Democracy Works.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19:185206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, D.C. 2008. “Rationality, Psychology and the Evolution of Democracy.” Working Paper, Vienna: Department of Economics, University Of Vienna.Google Scholar
Park, C., and Shin, D.C.. 2006. “Do Asian Values Deter Popular Support for Democracy in South Korea?Asian Survey 46:341361.Google Scholar
Peterson, B.E., Doty, R.M., and Winter, D.G.. 1993. “Authoritarianism and Attitudes toward Contemporary Social Issues.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 19:174184.Google Scholar
Perry, E.J. 2008. “Chinese Conceptions of ‘Rights’: From Mencius to Mao – and Now.” Perspectives on Politics 6:3750.Google Scholar
Phipott, D. 2007. “Explaining the Political Ambivalence of Religion.” American Political Science Review 101:505525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R.E. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pye, L.W. 1985. Asian Power and Politics: The Cultural Dimensions of Authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, M. 2001. “The Presbyterian Church in the Formation of Taiwan's Democratic Society, 1945–2001.” American Asian Review 19:6396.Google Scholar
Scalapino, R. 1989. The Politics of Development: Perspectives on Twentieth Century Asia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom, New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
Taylor, R.L. 1985. The Religious Dimensions of Confucianism, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Tola, F., and Dragonetti, C.. 2002. On Voidness: A Study On Buddhist Nihilism. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar
Tsai, C.-H. 2004. “An Explorary Analysis of Effects of Referendum on Political Systems and Party Systems.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy 1:2741.Google Scholar
Tu, W. 1996. “Cultural Identity and the Politics of Recognition in Contemporary Taiwan.” China Quarterly 148:11151140.Google Scholar
Weller, R.P. 1987. “The Politics of Ritual Disguise: Repression and Response in Taiwanese Popular Religion.” Modern China 13:1739.Google Scholar
Weller, R.P. 2000. “Living at the Edge: Religion, Capitalism, and the End of the Nation-State in Taiwan.” Public Culture 12:477498.Google Scholar
Wink, P., Dillon, M., and Prettyman, A.. 2007. “Religiousness, Spiritual Seeking, and Authoritarianism: Findings from a Longitudinal Study.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 46:321335.Google Scholar
Wright, A.F. 1962. “Values, Roles, and Personalities.” In Confucian Personalities, eds., Wright, S., and Twitchett, D.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Yao, X. 2000. An Introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar