CJO - Abstract - Take Five, a nutrition education intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intakes: impact on consumer choice and nutrient intakes

Cambridge Journals Online

Cambridge Journals Online
British Journal of Nutrition (1998), 80 : 123-131 Cambridge University Press
doi:10.1017/S0007114598001020 (About doi)
Published online by Cambridge University Press 09 Mar 2007
Cambridge Journals Online - CUP Full-Text Page
British Journal of Nutrition (1998), 80:123-131 Cambridge University Press
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1998
doi:10.1017/S0007114598001020

Research Article

Take Five, a nutrition education intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intakes: impact on consumer choice and nutrient intakes


David N. Coxa1 c1, Annie S. Andersona2, Joanna Reynoldsa1, Susan McKellara2, Michael E. J. Leana2 and David J. Melaa1

a1 Consumer Sciences Department, Institute of Food Research, Reading RG6 6BZ, UK
a2 Department of Human Nutrition, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK
Article author query
cox dn PubMed  Google Scholar
anderson as PubMed  Google Scholar
reynolds j PubMed  Google Scholar
mckellar s PubMed  Google Scholar
lean me PubMed  Google Scholar
mela dj PubMed  Google Scholar

Abstract

This study reports results from a randomized controlled intervention trial, focusing on: (1) the identification of successful consumer strategies for increasing fruit and vegetable intakes to the recommended levels of more than five (80 g) portions per day and (2) impact on overall diet and nutrient intakes. Adult men and women (n 170) fulfilling the main recruitment criterion of eating less than five fruit and vegetable portions per day but contemplating increasing intakes were recruited. Complete valid dietary data was provided by 101 intervention (fifty-nine estimated fruit and vegetable intakes, and forty-two simultaneous weighed total dietary and estimated fruit and vegetable intakes) and twenty-four control subjects (weighed total dietary intakes). Intervention advice included the specific association of high fruit and vegetable intake with reduced risk of disease, practicalities, and portion definition with a target intake of greater than five 80 g fruit and vegetable portions per day for 8 weeks. There were significant effects (P < 0·001) on weighed intakes of fruit and vegetables in the intervention group, rising from 324 (se 25) to 557 (se 31) g/d and reflected by validated portion measures at 8 weeks intervention. Successful strategies chosen by ‘achievers’ of the target intake (65% of subjects) were conventional (fruit as a snack, vegetables with main meals etc.) and favoured fruit. There were significant increases in percentage energy from carbohydrate (from sugars not starch), vitamin C, carotenes and NSP and there was a significant decrease in percentage energy from fat for subjects who had high fat intakes (> 35% energy) at baseline. Follow-up self-reported measures at 6 and 12 months indicated mean intakes of 4·5 and 4·6 defined portions/d respectively, suggesting some sustainable effect. In conclusion, the intervention led to significant increases in fruit and vegetable intakes largely via conventional eating habits, with some desirable effects on macro- and micronutrient intakes.

(Received September 25 1997)

(Revised January 14 1998)

(Accepted February 06 1998)

Key Words: Fruit and Vegetables; Consumer choice; Nutrient intake; Nutritional intervention

Correspondence:

c1 *Corresponding author: Dr David N. Cox, fax +44 (0) 118 9267917, email david.cox@bbsrc.ac.uk


Cambridge University Press