Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T23:50:48.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Wage Payment Reform on Workers’ Labor Supply, Wages, and Welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2012

Esther Redmount ,
Arthur Snow  and
Ronald S. Warren Jr.
Esther Redmount*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Economics and Business, Colorado College, 14 E. Cache La Poudre, Colorado Springs, CO 80903. E-mail: eredmount@coloradocollege.edu.
Arthur Snow*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Economics, Terry College of Business, Brooks Hall, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602. E-mail: snow@uga.edu.
Ronald S. Warren Jr.*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Economics, Terry College of Business, Brooks Hall, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602. E-mail: warren@uga.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine the economic consequences of an 1886 reform in Massachusetts that mandated the weekly payment of wages. We derive conditions on key elasticities of labor supply that determine the qualitative effects of the reform on workers’ effective wages and utility. We match census and administrative data on workers in a Lowell textile mill for a period encompassing the switch from monthly to weekly payment. Empirical estimates of a labor supply equation imply that the reform increased workers’ effective wage rates and welfare. The reform also decreased the mill workers’ average wage, as predicted by the theory of compensating differentials.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 72 , Issue 4 , 14 December 2012 , pp. 1064 - 1087
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balke, Nathan, and Gordon, Robert J.. “Price Levels.” In The American Business Cycle: Continuity and Change, edited by Gordon, Robert J., 781–850. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Blundell, Richard, Ham, John, and Meghir, Costas. “Unemployment and Female Labour Supply.” The Economic Journal 97, Conference Supplement (1987): 44–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandeis, Elizabeth. “Labor Legislation.” In History of Labor in the United States, 1896–1932. Vol. 3, edited by Commons, John R. et al. ., 399–697. New York: Macmillan, 1935.Google Scholar
Copeland, Melvin T.The Cotton Manufacturing Industry in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1912.Google Scholar
Fishback, Price V.Soft Coal, Hard Choices. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishback, Price V., Holmes, Rebecca, and Allen, Samuel. “Lifting the Curse of Dimensionality: Measures of States’ Labor Legislation Climate in the United States During the Progressive Era.” Labor History 30, no. 3 (2009): 313–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Milton. “The Quantity Theory of Money: A Restatement.” In The Optimum Quantity of Money and Other Essays, edited by Friedman, Milton, 51–67. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1969.Google Scholar
Johnson, William R., and Skinner, Jonathan. “Labor Supply and Marital Separation.” American Economic Review 76, no. 3 (1986): 455–69.Google Scholar
Keyssar, Alexander. Out of Work: The First Century of Unemployment in Massachusetts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Kim, Iltae, Snow, Arthur, and Warren, Ronald S. Jr. “Optimal Taxation with Deferred Compensation.” Southern Economic Journal 63, no. 2 (1996): 429–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaHaye, Laura. “Inflation and Currency Reform.” Journal of Political Economy 93, no. 3 (1985): 537–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence Manufacturing Company Records. Baker Library Historical Collections, Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
Massachusetts Bureau of Statistics of Labor. “Fall River, Lowell and Lawrence.” Thirteenth Annual Report, pt. 3. Boston: Rand, Avery and Company, March 1882, 195–415.Google Scholar
McGowan, Carl E. “The Divisibility of Employment Contracts.” Iowa Law Review 21, no. 1 (1935): 50–78.Google Scholar
McKelvey, Richard D., and Zavoina, William. “A Statistical Model for the Analysis of Ordinal Level Dependent Variables.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 4, no. 1 (1975): 103–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nockleby, John T. “Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations in the Nineteenth Century: The Transformation of Property, Contract, and Tort.” Harvard Law Review 93, no. 7 (1980): 1510–39.Google Scholar
Rotella, Elyce. “Pawnbroking and Personal Loan Markets.” In Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History, edited by Moykr, Joel, 170–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Rotella, Elyce, and Alter, George. “Working-Class Debt in the Late-Nineteenth-Century United States.” Journal of Family History 18, no. 2 (1993): 111–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinfeld, Robert J.Coercion, Contract, and Free Labor in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. “Labor Legislation.” Report on the Labor Laws of the United States. Washington, DC: GPO, July 20, 1892, 53–532.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate, Committee on Education and Labor. Report upon the Relations Between Labor and Capital, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: GPO, 1885.Google Scholar