Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T04:52:44.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2012

Murphy Halliburton
Murphy Halliburton*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Queens College and the Graduate Center, CUNY. Email: murphy.halliburton@qc.cuny.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This issue aims to assess the state of claims over intangible forms of property, which have been expanding in recent decades enabled by Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property and other international conventions. The articles examine the nature and limitations of intellectual property law and related property-like claims over intangible products and expressions, and present cases from the expanding margins of intangible property provisions including analyses of how these trends are playing out in the Global South and in areas outside of intellectual property law. The contributors show how both expansions of intangible property provisions and resistances to these expansions increase the terrain of experience that is enclosed by proprietary claims and suggest alternative strategies for responding to the contemporary intangible property regime.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 19 , Special Issue 3: Intangible Property at the Periphery: Expanding Enclosure in the 21st Century , August 2012 , pp. 233 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aragon, Lorraine. “Copyrighting Culture for the Nation? Intangible Property Nationalism and the Regional Arts of Indonesia.” International Journal of Cultural Property (2012, this issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biagioli, Mario. “Patent Republic: Representing Inventions, Constructing Rights and Authors.” Social Research 73, no. 4 (2006): 1129–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biagioli, Mario, Jaszi, Peter, and Woodmansee, Martha, eds. Making and Unmaking Intellectual Property: Creative Production in Legal and Cultural Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, James. Shamans, Software, and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, James. “The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain.” Law and Contemporary Problems 66 (2003): 33–74.Google Scholar
Boyle, James. The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael F. “Can Culture be Copyrighted?” Current Anthropology 39, no. 2 (1998): 193–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Michael F.Who Owns Native Culture? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Collins, John. “Culture, Content, and the Enclosure of Human Being: UNESCO's ‘Intangible’ Heritage in the New Millennium.” Radical History Review 109 (2010): 121–36.Google Scholar
Collins, John. “Reconstructing the ‘Cradle of Brazil’: The Detachability of Morality and the Nature of Cultural Labor in Salvador, Bahia's Pelourinho World Heritage Site.” International Journal of Cultural Property (2012, this issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombe, Rosemary. The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties: Authorship, Appropriation and the Law. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Creative Commons. “About.” ⟨http://creativecommons.org/about⟩ accessed 19 January 2012.Google Scholar
Cullet, Philippe. “Patents and Medicines: The Relationship between TRIPS and the Human Right to Health.” In Perspectives on Health and Human Rights, edited by Gruskin, S., Grodin, M., Annas, G., and Marks, S., 179–202. New York: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Ferry, Elizabeth, and Limbert, Mandana. “Introduction.” In Timely Assets: The Politics of Resources and Their Temporalities, edited by Ferry, Elizabeth and Limbert, Mandana, 25–50. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Fish, Allison. “The Commodification and Exchange of Knowledge in the Case of Transnational Commercial Yoga.” International Journal of Cultural Property 13 (2006): 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliburton, Murphy. “Drug Resistance, Patent Resistance: Indian Pharmaceuticals and the Impact of a New Patent Regime.” Global Public Health 4, no. 6 (2009): 515–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halliburton, Murphy. “Resistance or Inaction? Protecting Ayurvedic Medical Knowledge and Problems of Agency.” American Ethnologist 38, no. 1 (2011): 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallowell, A. Irving. “The Nature and Function of Property as a Social Institution.” In Culture and Experience, 236–249. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1955. First published 1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez-Reguant, Ariana. “Copyrighting Che: Art and Authorship under Cuban Late Socialism.” In The Anthropology of Globalization: A Reader, 2nd ed., edited by Inda, Jonathan Xavier and Rosaldo, Renato, 254–276. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2008. First published 2004.Google Scholar
Holton, Gerald. Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought: Kepler to Einstein. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Kelty, Christopher. Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence. Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: Penguin, 2004.Google Scholar
Lowie, Robert H. “Incorporeal Property in Primitive Society.” Yale Law Journal 37, no. 5 (1928): 551–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge, 1922.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. Translated by Cunnison, Ian. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1953. First published 1923.Google Scholar
McLeod, Kembrew. Freedom of Expression®: Resistance and Repression in the Age of Intellectual Property. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert. “The Matthew Effect in Science, II.” Isis 79 (1988): 606–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mgbeoji, Ikechi. Global Biopiracy: Patents, Plants and Indigenous Knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Oguamanam, Chidi. “Local Knowledge as Trapped Knowledge: Intellectual Property, Culture, Power and Politics.” Journal of World Intellectual Property 11, no. 1 (2008): 29–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, Bronwyn. “Taxonomy, Type Specimens, and the Making of Biological Property in Intellectual Property Rights Law.” Journal of Intellectual Cultural Property (2012, this issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pipes, Richard. Property and Freedom. London: Vintage, 2000.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul. Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Rose, Mark. Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Sherman, Brad, and Bentley, Lionel. The Making of Modern Intellectual Property Law: The British Experience 1760–1911. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Shiva, Vandana. Protect or Plunder? Understanding Intellectual Property Rights. London: Zed Books, 2001.Google ScholarPubMed
Srinivas, Krishna Ravi. “Protecting Traditional Knowledge Holders' Interests and Preventing Misappropriation—Traditional Knowledge Commons and Biocultural Protocols: Necessary But Not Sufficient?” Journal of Intellectual Cultural Property (2012, this issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunder Rajan, Kaushik. Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Tully, James. An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNESCO. Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage Paris, 17 October 2003. ⟨http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001325/132540e.pdf⟩ accessed 27 December 2011.Google Scholar
Verdery, Katherine, and Humphrey, Caroline. “Introduction: Raising Questions about Property.” In Property in Question: Value Transformation in the Global Economy, edited by Verdery, K. and Humphrey, C., 1–28. Oxford, UK: Berg, 2004.Google Scholar
Wolfgram, Matthew. “The Entextualization of Ayurveda as Intellectual Property.” International Journal of Cultural Property (2012, this issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar