Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T01:29:43.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Energy and climate change in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2012

Carlo Carraro  and
Emanuele Massetti
Carlo Carraro
Affiliation:
University of Venice and Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Italy. Email: carlo.carraro@feem.it
Emanuele Massetti
Affiliation:
Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, FEEM and CMCC, 195 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA. Tel: 203-4365-783. Email: emanuele.massetti@yale.edu or emanuele.massetti@feem.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines future energy and emissions scenarios in China generated by the Integrated Assessment Model WITCH. A Business-as-Usual scenario is compared with five scenarios in which greenhouse gases emissions are taxed, at different levels. The elasticity of China's emissions is estimated by pooling observations from all scenarios and comparing them with the elasticity of emissions in OECD countries. China has a higher elasticity than the OECD for a carbon tax lower than US$50 per ton of CO2-eq. For higher taxes, emissions in OECD economies are more elastic than in China. Our best guess indicates that China would need to introduce a tax equal to about US$750 per ton of CO2-eq in 2050 to achieve the Major Economies Forum goal set for mid-century. In our preferred estimates, the discounted cost of following the 2°C trajectory is equal to 5.4 per cent and to 2.7 per cent of GDP in China and the OECD, respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 17 , Issue 6 , December 2012 , pp. 689 - 713
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blanford, G.J., Richels, R.G., and Rutherford, T.F. (2008), ‘Revised emissions growth projections in China: why post-Kyoto climate policy must look East’, The Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements, Discussion Paper 08-06, September.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosetti, V. and Frankel, J. (2012), ‘Politically feasible emissions targets to attain 460 ppm CO2 concentrations’, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 6(1): 86–109.Google Scholar
Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Galeotti, M., Massetti, E., and Tavoni, M. (2006), ‘WITCH: a World Induced Technical Change Hybrid Model’, The Energy Journal, Special Issue on Hybrid Modelling of Energy-Environment Policies: Reconciling Bottom-up and Top-down, December: 13–38.Google Scholar
Bosetti, V., Massetti, E., and Tavoni, M. (2007), ‘The WITCH Model, structure, baseline, solutions’, FEEM Note di Lavoro No. 010.2007, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan.Google Scholar
Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Massetti, E., and Tavoni, M. (2008), ‘International technology spillovers and the economics of greenhouse gas atmospheric stabilization’, Energy Economics 30(6): 2912–2929.Google Scholar
Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Massetti, E., Sgobbi, A., and Tavoni, M. (2009a), ‘Optimal energy investment and R&D strategies to stabilise greenhouse gas atmospheric concentrations’, Resource and Energy Economics 31(2): 123–137.Google Scholar
Bosetti, V., De Cian, E., Sgobbi, A., and Tavoni, M. (2009b), ‘The 2008 WITCH Model: new model features and baseline’, FEEM Note di Lavoro No. 085.2009, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, W., Wang, C., Chen, J., Wang, K., Zhang, Y., and Lu, X. (2008), ‘Comparison of CO2 emission scenarios and mitigation opportunities in China's five sectors in 2020’, Energy Policy 36(3): 1181–1194.Google Scholar
Calvin, K., Clarke, L., Krey, V., Blanford, G., Kejun, J., Kainuma, M., Kriegler, E., Luderer, G., and Shukla, P.R. (2012), ‘The role of Asia in mitigating climate change: results from the Asia Modeling Exercise’, Energy Economics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Carraro, C. and Massetti, E. (2011), ‘Editorial’, International Environmental Agreements, Law, Economics and Politics, Special Issue on Reconciling Domestic Energy Needs and Global Climate Policy: Challenges and Opportunities for China and India, 11(3): 205–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ERI (2009), ‘2050 China Energy and CO2 Emissions Report (CECER)’, Energy Research Institute, Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
Havlík, P., Schneider, U.A., Schmid, E., Böttcher, H., Fritz, S., Skalský, R., Aoki, K., De Cara, S., Kindermann, G., Kraxner, F., Leduc, S., McCallum, I., Mosnier, A., Sauer, T., and Obersteiner, M. (2010), ‘Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets’, Energy Policy 39(10): 5690–5702.Google Scholar
IEA (2007), World Energy Outlook, Paris: International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
IEA (2010), World Energy Outlook, Paris: International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Jiang, K. and Hu, X. (2006), ‘Energy demand and emissions in 2030 in China: scenarios and policy options’, Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 7(3): 233–250.Google Scholar
Kram, T., Morita, T., Riahi, K., Roehrl, R.A., Van Rooijen, S., Sankovski, A., and De Vries, B. (2000), ‘Global and regional greenhouse gas emissions scenarios’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 63 (2–3): 335–371.Google Scholar
Levine, M. and Aden, N. (2008), ‘Global carbon emissions in the coming decades: the case of China’, Annual Review of Environmental and Resources 33: 19–38.Google Scholar
Levine, M.D., Zhou, N., and Price, L. (2009), ‘The greening of the Middle Kingdom: the story of energy efficiency in China’, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Working Paper No. LBNL-2413E.Google Scholar
Massetti, E. (2011), ‘Carbon tax scenarios for China and India: exploring politically feasible mitigation goals’, International Environmental Agreements, Law, Economics and Politics, Special Issue on Reconciling Domestic Energy Needs and Global Climate Policy: Challenges and Opportunities for China and India, 11(3): 209–227.Google Scholar
Massetti, E. and Sferra, F. (2010), ‘A numerical analysis of optimal extraction and trade of oil under climate and R&D policy’, FEEM Nota di Lavoro No. 113.2010, September.Google Scholar
Massetti, E. and Tavoni, M. (2012), ‘A developing Asia Emission Trading Scheme (Asia ETS)’, Energy Economics, [Available at] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.02.005.Google Scholar
Moskovitz, D., Lin, J., Weston, F., Zhou, F., Liu, S., Hu, Z., Bai, J., and Yu, C. (2007), Part A Final Report TA 4706-PRC: Energy Conservation and Resource Management Project, Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D. and Boyer, J. (2000), Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D. and Yang, Z. (1996), ‘A regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate-change strategies’, The American Economic Review 86(4): 741–765.Google Scholar
van Vuuren, D., Fengqi, Z., de Vries, B., Kejun, J., Graveland, C., and Yun, L. (2003), ‘Energy and emission scenarios for China in the 21st Century – exploration of baseline development and mitigation options,’ Energy Policy 31(4): 369–387.Google Scholar
World Bank (2009), The World Development Indicators 2006 (WDI) Database, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. (2011), ‘In what format and under what timeframe would China take on climate commitments? A roadmap to 2050’, International Environmental Agreements, Law, Economics and Politics, Special Issue on Reconciling Domestic Energy Needs and Global Climate Policy: Challenges and Opportunities for China and India, 11(3): 245–259.Google Scholar
Zhou, N., Levine, M.D., and Price, L. (2010), ‘Overview of current energy efficiency policies in China’, Energy Policy 38(11): 6439–6452.Google Scholar
Zhou, N., Fridley, D., McNeil, M., Zheng, N., Ke, J., and Levine, M. (2011), ‘China's energy and carbon emissions outlook to 2050’, Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Working Paper No. LBNL-4472E.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Carraro and Massetti supplementary material

Appendix

Download Carraro and Massetti supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 22.4 KB