Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T16:38:22.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of a high-fat diet and sucrose drinking option on the development of obesity in spontaneously hypertensive rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Stephen Rattigan
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, University of Tasmania, Box 252C, GPO Hobart, Tasmania 7001
Peter R.C. Howe
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Division of Human Nutrition, Kintore Avenue, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
Michael G. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, University of Tasmania, Box 252C, GPO Hobart, Tasmania 7001
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Energy intakes, body-weights, body fat index, total body fat and interscapular brown adipose tissue (IBAT) were examined in adult male, spontaneously hypertensive, stroke-prone (SHR-SP) rats and normotensive Wistar/Kyoto (WKY) controls given one of four diets for 33 d: (a) a starch diet, (b) a starch diet and a sucrose solution drinking option, (c) an 80xenergy from fat (F80) diet, (d) the F80 diet and a sucrose drinking option.

2. The SHR-SP rats showed a complete resistance to obesity on all four diets. For the high-fat diet the WKY animals became markedly obese with approximately two-fold increases in body-weight gain and body fat index when compared with the SHR-SP rats. The gain in total body fat was also significantly greater. IBAT as a percentage of total body-weight did not differ between the WKY and SHR-SP groups.

3. Compared with the WKY animals, the SHR-SP rats showed a reduced food intake but had the same potential to gain weight from the high-fat diet.

4. It is concluded that the resistance to obesity by the hypertensive animals is the result of a diminished energy intake.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1986

References

REFERENCES

Clark, M. G. (1982). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 7, 5562.Google Scholar
Howe, P. R. C.Provis, J. C., West, M. J. & Chalmers, J. P. (1979). Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 1, 115122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanarek, R. B. & Hirsch, E. (1977). Federation Proceedings 36, 154158.Google Scholar
Lemonnier, D. (1972). Journal of Clinical Investigation 51, 29072915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemonnier, D., Manchon, P. & Gradnauer-Grigho, S. (1968). Annales de la Nutrition et de l' AIimentation 22, 107119.Google Scholar
Levin, B. E., Triscari, J. & Sullivan, A. C. (1980). Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behaviour 13, 107113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelsen, O. & Anderson, A. A. (1959). Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 53, 282290.Google Scholar
Miller, D. S. (1979). In Animal Models of Obesity, pp. 131140 [Festing, M. F. W., editor]. London: MacMillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagaoka, A. & Lovenberg, W. (1976). Life Sciences 19, 2934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okamoto, K., Yamori, Y, & Nagaoka, A. (1974). Circulation Research Suppl. 3536, 143150.Google Scholar
Peckam, S. C., Enteman, C. & Carroll, H. W. (1962). Journal of Nutrition 77, 187197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattigan, S. & Clark, M. G. (1984). Journal of Nutrition 114, 19711977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothwell, N. J. & Stock, M. J. (1983). Clinical Science 64, 1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalfani, A. & Springer, D. (1976). Physiology and Behaviour 17, 461471.Google Scholar
Schemmel, R., Michelsen, O. & Tolgay, Z. (1969). American Journal of Physiology 216, 373379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Susini, C. & Lavau, M. (1978). Diabetes 27, 114120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
York, D. A. (1979). In Animal Models of Obesity, pp. 3964 [Festing, M. F. W., editor]. London: MacMillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar