a1 Department of Pediatrics – Cardiology, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America
a2 Division of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America
a3 Department of Pediatrics – Cardiology, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America
a4 Sibley Heart Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
a5 Cardiology, Children's Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America
a6 Cardiology, Miami Children's Hospital, Miami, Florida, United States of America
a7 Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, Arnold Palmer Hospital, Orlando, Florida, United States of America
a8 Department of Nursing, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford, California, United States of America
a9 Nursing – Cardiovascular Program, The Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
a10 Pediatric Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
a11 Division of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America
Background Poor weight gain is common in infants after Stage I Norwood operation and can negatively impact outcomes.
Objectives The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of feeding strategy on interstage weight gain.
Methods In a multi-centre study, 158 infants discharged following the Norwood operation were enrolled prospectively. Weight and feeding data were obtained at 2-week intervals. Differences between feeding regimens in average daily weight gain and change in weight-for-age z-score between Stage I discharge and Stage II surgery were examined.
Results Discharge feeding regimens were oral only in 52%, oral with tube supplementation in 33%, and by nasogastric/gastrostomy tube only in 15%. There were significant differences in the average daily interstage weight gain among the feeding groups – oral only 25.0 grams per day, oral/tube 21.4 grams per day, and tube only 22.3 grams per day – p = 0.019. Tube-only-fed infants were significantly older at Stage II (p = 0.004) and had a significantly greater change in weight-for-age z-score (p = 0.007). The overall rate of weight gain was 16–32 grams per day, similar to infant norms. The rate of weight gain declined over time, with earlier decline observed for oral- and oral/tube-fed infants (less than 15 grams per day at 5.4 months) in comparison with tube-only-fed infants (less than 15 grams per day at 8.6 months).
Conclusion Following Stage I Norwood, infants discharged on oral feeding had better average daily weight gain than infants with tube-assisted feeding. The overall weight gain was within the normal limits in all feeding groups, but the rate of weight gain decreased over time, with an earlier decline in infants fed orally.
(Received August 03 2011)
(Accepted December 11 2011)
(Online publication January 24 2012)
c1 Correspondence to: Dr K. Uzark, PhD, CPNP, University of Michigan Mott Children's Hospital, L1242 Women's, SPC 5204, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-5204, United States of America. Tel: +1 734 615 9748; Fax: +1 734 232 3744; E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org