Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T14:35:34.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of Active Mortality Surveillance System Data for Monitoring Hurricane-Related Deaths—Texas, 2008

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2012

Ekta Choudhary*
Affiliation:
Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia USA
David F. Zane
Affiliation:
Community Preparedness Section, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas USA
Crystal Beasley
Affiliation:
Clinical Management, Pharmaceutical Product Development, Austin, Texas USA (formerly affiliated with the Environmental Epidemiology and Disease Registries Section, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas USA)
Russell Jones
Affiliation:
Community Preparedness Section, Texas Department of State Health Services, Health Service Region 7, Temple, Texas USA
Araceli Rey
Affiliation:
Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Career Epidemiology Field Officer assigned to Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas USA
Rebecca S. Noe
Affiliation:
Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia USA
Colleen Martin
Affiliation:
Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia USA
Amy F. Wolkin
Affiliation:
Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia USA
Tesfaye M. Bayleyegn
Affiliation:
Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia USA
*
Correspondence: Ekta Choudhary, PhD, MPH Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 4770 Buford Highway, NE MS F-57 Chamblee, GA 30341 USA E-mail echoudhary@cdc.gov

Abstract

Introduction

The Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) implemented an active mortality surveillance system to enumerate and characterize hurricane-related deaths during Hurricane Ike in 2008. This surveillance system used established guidelines and case definitions to categorize deaths as directly, indirectly, and possibly related to Hurricane Ike.

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate Texas DSHS' active mortality surveillance system using US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) surveillance system evaluation guidelines.

Methods

Using CDC's Updated Guidelines for Surveillance System Evaluation, the active mortality surveillance system of the Texas DSHS was evaluated. Data from the active mortality surveillance system were compared with Texas vital statistics data for the same time period to estimate the completeness of reported disaster-related deaths.

Results

From September 8 through October 13, 2008, medical examiners (MEs) and Justices of the Peace (JPs) in 44 affected counties reported deaths daily by using a one-page, standardized mortality form. The active mortality surveillance system identified 74 hurricane-related deaths, whereas a review of vital statistics data revealed only four deaths that were hurricane-related. The average time of reporting a death by active mortality surveillance and vital statistics was 14 days and 16 days, respectively.

Conclusions

Texas's active mortality surveillance system successfully identified hurricane-related deaths. Evaluation of the active mortality surveillance system suggested that it is necessary to collect detailed and representative mortality data during a hurricane because vital statistics do not capture sufficient information to identify whether deaths are hurricane-related. The results from this evaluation will help improve active mortality surveillance during hurricanes which, in turn, will enhance preparedness and response plans and identify public health interventions to reduce future hurricane-related mortality rates.

Choudhary E, Zane DF, Beasley C, Jones R, Rey A, Noe RS, Martin C, Wolkin AF, Bayleyegn TM. Evaluation of active mortality surveillance system data for monitoring hurricane-related deaths, Texas, 2008. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012;27(4):1-6.

Type
Special Report
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Thacker, MT, Lee, R, Sabogal, RI, et al. . Overview of deaths associated with natural events, United States. 1979-2004. Disasters. 2008;32(2):303-315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Diaz, JH. The public health impact of hurricanes and major flooding. J La State Med Soc. 2004;156(3):145-150.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Shultz, JM, Russell, J, Espinel, Z. Epidemiology of tropical cyclones: the dynamics of disaster, disease, and development. Epidemiol Rev. 2005;27:21-35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Ragan, P, Schulte, J, Nelson, SJ, et al. . Mortality surveillance: 2004 to 2005 Florida hurricane-related deaths. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2008;29(2):148-153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climatic Data Center. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/index.php?report=global&year=2008&month=sep. Accessed September 8, 2009.Google Scholar
6. US Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency. Hurricane Ike: From Disaster to Recovery. http://www.fema.gov/hazard/hurricane/2008/ike/about.shtm. Accessed October 3, 2009.Google Scholar
7. Combs, DL, Quenemoen, LE, Parrish, RG, et al. . Assessing disaster-attributed mortality: development and application of a definition and classification matrix. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28(6):1124-1129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems: recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2001;50:RR-13:1-35.Google Scholar
9. Robles, SC, Marrett, LD, Clarke, EA, et al. . An application of capture-recapture methods to the estimation of completeness of cancer registration. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(5):495-501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Chandrasekaran, C, Deming, WC. On a method of estimating birth and death rates and extent of registration. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1949;44(245):101-115.Google Scholar
11. Cates, W, Smith, JC, Rochat, RW, et al. . Assessment of surveillance and vital statics data for monitoring abortion mortality, United States, 1972-1975. Am J Epidemiol. 1978;108(3):200-206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Bayleyegn, T, Wolkin, A, Oberst, K, et al. . Rapid assessment of the needs and health status in Santa Rosa and Escambia Counties, Florida, after Hurricane Ivan, September 2004. Disaster Manag Response. 2006;4(1):12-18.Google Scholar
13. Brunkard, J, Namulanda, G, Ratard, R. Hurricane Katrina deaths, Louisiana, 2005. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(4):215-223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Lew, EO, Wetli, CV. Mortality from Hurricane Andrew. J Forensic Sci. 1996;41(3):449-452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Lugosi, CI. Natural disaster, unnatural deaths: the killings on the life care floors at Tenet's Memorial Medical Center after Hurricane Katrina, Issues. Law Med. 2007;23(1):71-85.Google Scholar
16. Zane, DF, Bayleyegn, TM, Hellsten, J, et al. . Tracking deaths related to Hurricane Ike, Texas, 2008. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011;5(1):23-28.Google Scholar