Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Sewell, Andrew
2013.
Language Testing and International Intelligibility: A Hong Kong Case Study.
Language Assessment Quarterly,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 4,
p.
423.
Fritz, Dana R.
and
Sikorski, Lorna D.
2013.
Efficacy in Accent Modification Services: Quantitative and Qualitative Outcomes for Korean Speakers of American English.
Perspectives on Communication Disorders and Sciences in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CLD) Populations,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 3,
p.
118.
Wilkerson, Miranda E.
2013.
The Sound of German: Descriptions of Accent by Native and Non‐Native Listeners.
Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German,
Vol. 46,
Issue. 1,
p.
106.
Franklin, Amber D.
and
Stoel-Gammon, Carol
2014.
Using Multiple Measures to Document Change in English Vowels Produced by Japanese, Korean, and Spanish Speakers: The Case for Goodness and Intelligibility.
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 4,
p.
625.
Muñoz, Carmen
and
Llanes, Àngels
2014.
Study Abroad and Changes in Degree of Foreign Accent in Children and Adults.
The Modern Language Journal,
Vol. 98,
Issue. 1,
p.
432.
Lappin‐Fortin, Kerry
and
Rye, B. J.
2014.
The Use of Pre‐/Posttest and Self‐Assessment Tools in a French Pronunciation Course.
Foreign Language Annals,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 2,
p.
300.
O'Brien, Mary Grantham
2014.
L2 Learners’ Assessments of Accentedness, Fluency, and Comprehensibility of Native and Nonnative German Speech.
Language Learning,
Vol. 64,
Issue. 4,
p.
715.
Crowther, Dustin
Trofimovich, Pavel
Isaacs, Talia
and
Saito, Kazuya
2015.
Does a Speaking Task Affect Second Language Comprehensibility?.
The Modern Language Journal,
Vol. 99,
Issue. 1,
p.
80.
Crowther, Dustin
Trofimovich, Pavel
Saito, Kazuya
and
Isaacs, Talia
2015.
Second Language Comprehensibility Revisited: Investigating the Effects of Learner Background.
TESOL Quarterly,
Vol. 49,
Issue. 4,
p.
814.
Saito, Kazuya
Trofimovich, Pavel
and
Isaacs, Talia
2015.
Using Listener Judgments to Investigate Linguistic Influences on L2 Comprehensibility and Accentedness: A Validation and Generalization Study.
Applied Linguistics,
p.
amv047.
Kennedy, Sara
Foote, Jennifer A.
and
Santos Buss, Larissa Kurtz Dos
2015.
Second Language Speakers at University: Longitudinal Development and Rater Behaviour.
TESOL Quarterly,
Vol. 49,
Issue. 1,
p.
199.
Thomson, Ron I.
2015.
The Handbook of English Pronunciation.
p.
209.
Kang, Tingting
2015.
Intelligent Design of Interactive Multimedia Listening Software.
p.
246.
Saito, Kazuya
and
Shintani, Natsuko
2016.
Do Native Speakers of North American and Singapore English Differentially Perceive Comprehensibility in Second Language Speech?.
TESOL Quarterly,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 2,
p.
421.
SAITO, KAZUYA
WEBB, STUART
TROFIMOVICH, PAVEL
and
ISAACS, TALIA
2016.
Lexical correlates of comprehensibility versus accentedness in second language speech.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 3,
p.
597.
Crowther, Dustin
Trofimovich, Pavel
and
Isaacs, Talia
2016.
Linguistic dimensions of second language accent and comprehensibility.
Journal of Second Language Pronunciation,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 2,
p.
160.
Saito, Kazuya
and
Shintani, Natsuko
2016.
Foreign accentedness revisited: Canadian and Singaporean raters’ perception of Japanese-accented English.
Language Awareness,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 4,
p.
305.
AKIYAMA, YUKA
and
SAITO, KAZUYA
2016.
Development of Comprehensibility and its Linguistic Correlates: A Longitudinal Study of Video‐Mediated Telecollaboration.
The Modern Language Journal,
Vol. 100,
Issue. 3,
p.
585.
SAITO, KAZUYA
TROFIMOVICH, PAVEL
and
ISAACS, TALIA
2016.
Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels.
Applied Psycholinguistics,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 2,
p.
217.
van Maastricht, Lieke
Krahmer, Emiel
and
Swerts, Marc
2016.
Native speaker perceptions of (non-)native prominence patterns: Effects of deviance in pitch accent distributions on accentedness, comprehensibility, intelligibility, and nativeness.
Speech Communication,
Vol. 83,
Issue. ,
p.
21.