Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T04:23:47.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Type Ib/c Supernovae with and without Gamma-Ray Bursts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Maryam Modjaz*
Affiliation:
CCPP, New York University, 4 Washington Place New York City, NY, 10003, USA email: mmodjaz@nyu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

While the connection between Long Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and Type Ib/c Supernovae (SNe Ib/c) from stripped stars has been well-established, one key outstanding question is what conditions and factors lead to each kind of explosion in massive stripped stars. One promising line of attack is to investigate what sets apart SNe Ib/c with GRBs from those without GRBs. Here, I briefly present two observational studies that probe the SN properties and the environmental metallicities of SNe Ib/c (specifically broad-lined SNe Ic) with and without GRBs. I present an analysis of expansion velocities based on published spectra and on the homogeneous spectroscopic CfA data set of over 70 SNe of Types IIb, Ib, Ic and Ic-bl, which triples the world supply of well-observed Stripped SNe. Moreover, I demonstrate that a meta-analysis of the three published SN 1b/c metallicity data sets when including only values at the SN positions to probe natal oxygen abundances, indicates at very high significance that indeed SNe Ic erupt from more metal-rich environments than SNe Ib, while SNe Ic-bl with GRBs still prefer, on average, more metal-poor sites than those without GRBs.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2012

References

Anderson, J. P. et al. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 2660Google Scholar
Branch, D., et al. 2002, ApJ, 566, 1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, P. A. 2007, ARAA, 45, 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filippenko, A. V. 1997, ARAA, 35, 309Google Scholar
Hjorth, J. & Bloom, J. S. 2011, Chapter 9 in “Gamma-Ray Bursts” (arXiv:1104.2274)Google Scholar
Kewley, L. J. & Ellison, S. L. 2008, ApJ, 681, 1183Google Scholar
Leloudas, G., et al. 2011, A&A, 530, A95Google Scholar
Levesque, E. M., Berger, E., Kewley, L. J., & Bagley, M. M. 2010a, AJ, 139, 694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levesque, E. M., et al. 2010b, ApJ, 709, L26Google Scholar
Mazzali, P. A., Deng, J., Hamuy, M., & Nomoto, K. 2009, ApJ, 703, 1624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modjaz, M., et al. 2008, AJ, 135, 1136Google Scholar
Modjaz, M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 731, L4Google Scholar
Modjaz, M. 2011, AN, 332, 434Google Scholar
Pettini, M. & Pagel, B. E. J. 2004, MNRAS, 348, L59Google Scholar
Smartt, S. J. 2009, ARAA, 47, 63Google Scholar
Soderberg, A. M., et al. 2006, ApJ, 638, 930Google Scholar
Soderberg, A. M., et al. 2010, Nature, 463, 513Google Scholar
Vink, J. S. & de Koter, A. 2005, A&A, 442, 587Google Scholar
Woosley, S. E. & Bloom, J. S. 2006, ARAA, 44, 507CrossRefGoogle Scholar