American Political Science Review

Research Article

Gender Inequality in Deliberative Participation

CHRISTOPHER F. KARPOWITZa1 c1, TALI MENDELBERGa2 c2 and LEE SHAKERa3 c3

a1 Brigham Young University

a2 Princeton University

a3 Portland State University

Abstract

Can men and women have equal levels of voice and authority in deliberation or does deliberation exacerbate gender inequality? Does increasing women's descriptive representation in deliberation increase their voice and authority? We answer these questions and move beyond the debate by hypothesizing that the group's gender composition interacts with its decision rule to exacerbate or erase the inequalities. We test this hypothesis and various alternatives, using experimental data with many groups and links between individuals’ attitudes and speech. We find a substantial gender gap in voice and authority, but as hypothesized, it disappears under unanimous rule and few women, or under majority rule and many women. Deliberative design can avoid inequality by fitting institutional procedure to the social context of the situation.

Correspondence:

c1 Christopher F. Karpowitz is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Brigham Young University, P.O. Box 25545, Provo, UT 84602 (ckarpowitz@byu.edu).

c2 Tali Mendelberg is Associate Professor, Department of Politics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 (talim@princeton.edu).

c3 Lee Shaker is Assistant Professor, Department of Communication, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751, Mailstop COMM, Portland, OR 97201 (lshaker@pdx.edu).

Footnotes

We gratefully thank Martin Gilens, Valerie Hudson, Amaney Jamal, Dan Nielson, the journal co-editors, and anonymous reviewers for their many helpful comments, as well as Lisa Argyle, Dan Myers, and Steve Howell for invaluable assistance.

Metrics