Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T13:10:37.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In vitro investigations of the potential health benefits of Australian-grown faba beans (Vicia faba L.): chemopreventative capacity and inhibitory effects on the angiotensin-converting enzyme, α-glucosidase and lipase

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2012

Siem D. Siah
Affiliation:
Food Futures Flagship, CSIRO Food and Nutritional Sciences, 11 Julius Avenue, North Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, Pine Gully Road, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia School of Biomedical Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia
Izabela Konczak*
Affiliation:
Food Futures Flagship, CSIRO Food and Nutritional Sciences, 11 Julius Avenue, North Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia
Samson Agboola
Affiliation:
EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, Pine Gully Road, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia School of Agricultural and Wine Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia
Jennifer A. Wood
Affiliation:
NSW Department of Primary Industries, Tamworth Agricultural Institute, Calala, NSW 2340, Australia
Christopher L. Blanchard
Affiliation:
EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, Pine Gully Road, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia School of Biomedical Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: I. Konczak, fax +61 2 9490 8499, email izabela.konczak@csiro.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The functional properties, including antioxidant and chemopreventative capacities as well as the inhibitory effects on angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), α-glucosidase and pancreatic lipase, of three Australian-grown faba bean genotypes (Nura, Rossa and TF(Ic*As)*483/13) were investigated using an array of in vitro assays. Chromatograms of on-line post column derivatisation assay coupled with HPLC revealed the existence of active phenolics (hump) in the coloured genotypes, which was lacking in the white-coloured breeding line, TF(Ic*As)*483/13. Roasting reduced the phenolic content, and diminished antioxidant activity by 10–40 % as measured by the reagent-based assays (diphenylpicrylhydrazyl, 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) and oxygen radical absorbance capacity) in all genotypes. Cell culture-based antioxidant activity assay (cellular antioxidant activity) showed an increase of activity in the coloured genotypes after roasting. Faba bean extracts demonstrated cellular protection ability against H2O2-induced DNA damage (assessed using RAW264.7 cells), and inhibited the proliferation of all human cancer cell lines (BL13, AGS, Hep G2 and HT-29) evaluated. However, the effect of faba bean extracts on the non-transformed human cells (CCD-18Co) was negligible. Flow cytometric analyses showed that faba bean extracts successfully induced apoptosis of HL-60 (acute promyelocytic leukaemia) cells. The faba bean extracts also exhibited ACE, α-glucosidase and pancreatic lipase inhibitory activities. Overall, extracts from Nura (buff-coloured) and Rossa (red-coloured) were comparable, while TF(Ic*As)*483/13 (white-coloured) contained the lowest phenolic content and exhibited the least antioxidant and enzyme inhibition activities. These results are important to promote the utilisation of faba beans in human diets for various health benefits.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

Faba beans (Vicia faba L.), also commonly known as fava, horse and broad beans, are widely consumed in different parts of the world including Egypt, Sudan, The Netherlands, Spain, Saudi Arabia, India and China. Their seed coat colours range from white, buff (or beige), purple, green to red, with the buff-coloured beans being the most commonly accepted for human consumption. In 2008, the worldwide production of dry faba beans was approximately 4·1 million tonnes, and the export trade was valued at approximately US$291 million(1). Faba beans are grown in Australia as a break crop and exported to the Middle East and Asia(Reference Matthews and Marcellos2), with export trade valued at approximately US$58 million in 2008(1).

Pulses are well known to be an economical source of protein, carbohydrate and fibre, and are low in fat. Pulses are also incorporated in human diets for their additional nutritional benefits, especially their microconstituents including phenolic compounds, oligosaccharides(Reference Bouhnik, Flourie and D'Agay-Abensour3), enzyme inhibitors, phytosterols and saponins(Reference Mathers4, Reference Campos-Vega, Loarca-Piña and Oomah5). Intake of legumes is reported to potentially lower the risk of cancer(Reference Aune, De Stefani and Ronco6), CVD(Reference Anderson and Major7), hypertension and diabetes(Reference Ranilla, Kwon and Genevese8). Some of the microconstituents are currently marketed as functional foods and nutraceutical ingredients(Reference Ferguson9). Also, there have been many attempts to incorporate pulses into food products for enrichment of product quality and additional health benefits(Reference Gomez, Oliete and Rosell10, Reference Patterson, Maskus and Bassett11).

A wide range of methods are used to prepare faba beans including soaking, boiling and roasting. Heating was reported to result in significant decreases in polyphenols, enzyme inhibitors, phytic acid, some minerals and vitamins, but increase protein digestibility of faba beans(Reference Alonso, Aguirre and Marzo12, Reference Khalil and Mansour13). Interestingly, Acar et al. (Reference Acar, Gokmen and Pellegrini14) reported that roasting at 150°C for 60 min increased the antioxidant capacity of different types of pulses including black bean, borlotti bean, kidney bean, red soybean, yellow bean, giant lentils and chickpea, with an initial fall observed in the yellow and red soybeans after roasting for 10 min. Comparatively, in faba beans, the tannin content increased after roasting at 149°C/20 min and 177°C/18 min, but decreased after roasting at 204°C/14 min and 232°C/12 min(Reference Anderson, Idowu and Singh15).

Phenolic compounds are one of the microconstituents which have been gaining an increasing interest for their health-promoting properties, largely defined by their antioxidant activity. Previous research has reported different types of phenolic compounds found in faba beans, such as procyanidins(Reference Merghem, Jay and Brun16Reference Borowska, Giczewska and Zadernowski18), catechins(Reference Arts, van de Putte and Hollman19), flavonols(Reference Hertog, Hollman and Katan20), isoflavones(Reference Kaufman, Duke and Brielmann21), phenolic acids(Reference Sosulski and Dabrowski22) and tannins(Reference Moneam23Reference Karamac, Kosinska and Rybarczyk25), which are natural antioxidants(Reference Amarowicz, Troszynska and Bary Ko-Pikielna26). Phenolic compounds extracted from a variety of plant materials have been reported to have an ability to inhibit carbohydrate and lipid digestion, therefore preventing them from absorption. These could potentially lower the postprandial hyperglycaemic response and contribute towards weight maintenance(Reference Ikarashi, Takeda and Ito27, Reference Shimura, Tsuzuki and Kobayashi28).

Phenolic extracts of different types of beans were found to have antioxidant activities(Reference Amarowicz, Troszynska and Bary Ko-Pikielna26), protective effects against radical-induced DNA damage(Reference Madhujith, Amarowicz and Shahidi29), as well as antimutagenic(Reference de Mejía, Castaño-Tostado and Loarca-Piña30) and anticancer(Reference Itoh, Umekawa and Furuichi31) properties. Many have reported substantial amounts of phenolic compounds in raw(Reference Amarowicz, Karamac and Kmita-Glazewska32) and cooked faba beans(Reference Kalogeropoulos, Chiou and Ioannou33), but limited reports focus on the health benefits of faba bean phenolic compounds and also on the impact of food preparation heat processes on the retention and activities of phenolic compounds. The present study hence aims to investigate in vitro the potential health benefits of crude extracts from raw and cooked faba beans in the prevention of chronic diseases including hypertension, diabetes, obesity and different types of cancers. The results could support increased consumption of faba beans and the development of new food products using faba beans, enhancing the exploitation of the crop and providing better returns to growers.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

For the purpose of the study, three faba bean genotypes including cv. Nura (buff-coloured), cv. Rossa (red-coloured) and breeding line TF(Ic*As)*483/13 (white-coloured) were grown at the Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute experimental field in NSW, Australia in 2008. Harvested beans were air-dried and then stored at − 20°C until analysis.

Dry roasting

Roasting was performed at 150°C using dry heat in an oven (Premium Laboratory Oven, Thermoline Scientific) for 1 h (approximately 50 g per batch in a single layer on a foil tray and agitated gently after 30 min for uniform heating). Roasted beans were cooled at room temperature and ground into flour using an IKA-Universalmühle M20 Grinder (Janke and Kunkel).

Preparation of phenolic extracts

Extraction of phenolic compounds was carried out by dispersing the flour in aqueous acetone (acetone–water, 70:30, v/v)(Reference Merghem, Jay and Brun16) in a solid:solvent ratio of 1:10 and shaking for 2 h at room temperature. The supernatant was collected after centrifugation at 4000 g using an Eppendorf 5415D Centrifuge (Eppendorf-Netheler-Hinz) for 5 min at 5°C. A second extraction was performed on the residue and the extracts were pooled, concentrated under reduced pressure at 40°C using a rotary evaporator (Rotavapor R-205; Buchi) and then freeze-dried using a Christ-Alpha 1–4 freeze dryer (Biotech International). The extracts were stored at − 20°C until used. Distilled water was used to dissolve the dried extract and the reconstituted extracts were filtered through 0·45 μm Millipore filters (Millipore Australia Pty Ltd, Australia) before analysis. All extractions and measurements were performed at least in triplicate, except extractions from the raw beans which were performed in duplicate.

Total phenolic content, total flavonoid content and antioxidant capacity assays

The total phenolic content (TPC) assay was conducted according to Konczak et al. (Reference Konczak, Zabaras and Dunstan34). The total flavonoid content (TFC), diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging capacity and Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) assays were performed as described by Michalska et al. (Reference Michalska, Ceglinska and Amarowicz35). The oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assay was carried out as described by Prior et al. (Reference Prior, Hoang and Gu36).

Preparation of 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) free radical for post column derivatisation assay

The 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS)+ radical cation was prepared by dissolving ABTS (Sigma Aldrich) in deionised water (7 mm) and mixed with 2·45 mm of potassium persulphate overnight to allow complete reaction. The solution was diluted using distilled water to obtain an absorbance of 0·70 (sd 0·02) at 734 nm and filtered through a polypropylene membrane (0·45 μm)(Reference Ee, Agboola and Rehman37).

On-line post column derivatisation with HPLC

Analysis of the antioxidant activity was carried out on-line using ABTS cation radical. The HPLC system (ProStar model 410, Varian, Inc., Australia) consisted of a Phenomenex Luna 5U C18 column (100A pore size; 150 × 3 mm), preceded by a guard column (Phenomenex, 4 × 3 mm), a Varian 240I pump and a Varian 335 PDA Detector. The mobile phase A was water–acetic acid (99:1; v/v) and phase B was methanol–acetonitrile (50:50; v/v). An aliquot (8 μl) of the extract sample (50 mg/ml) dissolved in solvent A was injected and eluted in a gradient of 0–48 % phase B for 40 min at a flow-rate of 0·4 ml/min. UV spectra were recorded at 280 nm. Post column antioxidant activity on-line was determined on the HPLC eluent from the system which arrived at a ‘T’ piece and reacted with ABTS+ that was added at a flow rate of 0·4 ml/min. The absorbance of the reaction products was measured by a UV–Vis detector (Model 9050, Varian, Inc., Australia) at 414 nm.

Cell cultures

All cells lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection except the BL13 (human bladder transitional cell carcinoma) cells which were obtained from Dr D. Brookes(Reference Brookes, Zandvliet and Watt38). All cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidified 5 % CO2–95 % air atmosphere. BL13 cells were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (Invitrogen Corporation); AGS (gastric adenocarcinoma) in F-12K Ham's medium (Invitrogen Corporation); Hep G2 (hepatocellular) in Eagle's minimum essential medium (EMEM; Sigma-Aldrich); HT-29 (colorectal adenocarcinoma) in McCoy's 5a modified medium (Invitrogen Corporation); RAW264.7 (macrophage; Abelson murine leukaemia virus-induced tumour) in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Sigma-Aldrich); HL-60 (acute promyelocytic leukaemia) in Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium (IMDM; Invitrogen Corporation) and CCD-18Co (colon normal) cells were cultured in EMEM. Each medium was supplemented with 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 1000 units/ml penicillin (Invitrogen Corporation) and 10 % fetal calf serum, with the exception of IMDM for HL-60 which required 20 % serum.

Cellular antioxidant activity assay

The assessment of cellular antioxidant activity (CAA) was determined according to Tan et al. (Reference Tan, Konczak and Ramzan39) and Wolfe & Liu(Reference Wolfe and Liu40). Briefly, 1 × 105/ml of Hep G2 cells were plated in a ninety-six-well microplate and incubated for 24 h. Next, the medium was removed and the cells were washed using PBS. The cells were then treated with different concentrations of faba bean extracts (10 μl in PBS), added to 80 μl of PBS, followed by the addition of 2′,7′-dichlorfluorescein-diacetate (Sigma-Aldrich) (10 μl) (250 μm in PBS), and incubated for 1 h. Subsequently, the cells were washed using PBS (100 μl) and added to 100 μl of 2,2′-azobis (2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride in Hank's balanced salt solution (600 μm). The fluorescence was measured at 485 nm excitation and 538 nm emission wavelengths for every 5 min in 1 h. The final fluorescence values were corrected for the blank sample readings, and a time v. fluorescence graph was plotted. A quercetin standard was used to express the results as quercetin equivalents per g of dry weight of beans.

Antiproliferation assay

The assessments of antiproliferation activity of the faba bean crude extracts were carried out on the adhesive cells, BL13, AGS, Hep G2 and HT-29 using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide colorimetric assay, as outlined by Tan et al. (Reference Tan, Konczak and Ramzan39). PBS was used to dissolve the sample extracts.

Assessment of apoptosis and cytolysis by flow cytometry

Suspensions (4·5 ml) of HL-60 cells (2·5–5 × 105/ml) were treated with 225 μl (0·8 mg/ml) of extracts for 3, 12 and 24 h in 25 cm2 culture flasks in triplicate. Untreated cells were used as a control. For the dose–response evaluation, the cells were treated with three different extract concentrations (0·4, 0·8 and 1·6 mg/ml in PBS) for 24 h. Cells were stained with Annexin V-Alexa Fluor 488 annexin V/Dead cell apoptosis kit with Alexa Flour 488 annexin V and PI for flow cytometry (Invitrogen Corporation) according to the manufacturer's directions. After the set incubation time, the cells were harvested, washed with cold PBS and resuspended in Annexin-binding buffer. Following this, 100 μl of cells were stained by adding 5 μl of Annexin V and 1 μl of propidium iodine and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. Next, the cells were mixed with 400 μl of Annexin-binding buffer and immediately placed on ice. Analysis was performed by flow cytometry using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) and FlowJo software (TreeStar Inc.) to determine the extent of cell apoptosis and lysis. From 3000 to 10 000 events were acquired for each measurement and the cell populations were gated for analysis.

Cellular protection against H2O2

The cellular protection against H2O2 assay was carried out using RAW264.7 cells according to Tan et al. (Reference Tan, Konczak and Ramzan39), except that the concentration of H2O2 used was 40 mm.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition assay

The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition assay was carried out as described in Shalaby et al. (Reference Shalaby, Zakora and Otte41) using furanacroloyl-Phe-Glu-Glu as substrates. Results were expressed as μg of captopril equivalents/g of dry weight of beans.

α-Glucosidase inhibition assay

The α-glucosidase inhibition was determined as described by Ikarashi et al. (Reference Ikarashi, Takeda and Ito27) using sucrose as substrates, with slight modifications. An α-glucosidase enzyme solution was prepared by dissolving 100 mg of intestinal acetone powders from rat (Sigma-Aldrich) in 1 ml of 0·1 m maleate buffer (pH 6) and homogenised using an ultrasonicator for 6 min on a 30 s rest cycle. The enzyme solution was centrifuged at 3000 g for 30 min and the supernatant was diluted to 1:2 (v/v) using the buffer solution. Sample solutions (20 μl) were mixed with 2 % sucrose (w/v) in maleate buffer (20 μl). The enzymatic reaction was initiated by adding enzyme solution (20 μl) to the mixture and incubated at 37°C for 60 min. The enzymatic reaction was terminated by heating at 100°C for 10 min. Sample mixture (20 μl) was then used to react with the colour reagent (Glucose CII-Test Wako, Wako Pure Chemical Industries) (3 ml) at 37°C for 5 min and the absorbance was measured at 505 nm. Negative controls were prepared as described by replacing the sample solution with the buffer solution, whereas control and sample blanks were prepared by replacing the enzyme and sucrose solutions with the buffer solutions. The relative α-glucosidase inhibition was calculated using the following formula:

where A S and A C were the absorbance of sample and negative control, and A SB and A CB were the absorbance of sample and control blanks.

Lipase inhibition assay

The lipase inhibitory activity was assayed as described by Shimura et al. (Reference Shimura, Tsuzuki and Kobayashi28) using 4-methylumbelliferyl oleate as the substrate, except that the porcine pancreatic lipase (Sigma type II) was prepared using a concentration of 0·085 g/ml. The relative lipase inhibition activity was calculated using the following formula:

where F S and F C were the values of samples and negative control measured fluorometrically at an emission wavelength of 450 nm and excitation of 320 nm by a Varian Cary Eclipse Fluorescence Spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies), and F SB and F CB were the fluorescence readings of sample and control blanks.

Statistical analysis

The significant differences between mean values were calculated based on at least three independent evaluations (n 3) and the standard deviations were also calculated. Student's t test was conducted to assess differences between the samples at the level of P < 0·05. All half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were calculated from the corresponding dose inhibition curve according to their best-fit shapes based on at least four reaction points using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp, USA). Statistical correlation analyses were performed using Graphpad Prism 5 (Graphpad Software). Results for correlation analysis were considered statistically significant when P < 0·05.

Results and discussion

Total phenolic content, total flavonoid content and antioxidant capacities

The effects of roasting on TPC, TFC and antioxidant capacity of the extracts from three faba bean genotypes are presented in Table 1. In comparison to the raw sample, a higher extraction yield was obtained for the roasted samples (approximately 10 % higher). The difference between the genotypes with regards to the extraction yield was negligible. The level of TPC and TFC of Rossa was not significantly different from Nura in both of their raw and roasted beans, except that the roasted Rossa had slightly higher TFC than the roasted Nura. The TPC in the raw beans of coloured genotypes were about four times, while the TFC was about three times higher than TF(Ic*As)*483/13. After roasting, the TPC and TFC contents of Nura and Rossa were about two times higher than TF(Ic*As)*483/13. The white-coloured TF(Ic*As)*483/13 (termed ‘tannin free’), was developed for its low tannin content, thus explaining the low TPC and TFC detected in the present study.

Table 1 Extraction yield, total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity, Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) and oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) of crude extracts from the raw and roasted faba bean genotypes

(Mean values and standard deviations of at least three independent measurements, n 3)

DW, dry weight; GAEq, gallic acid equivalents; CEq, catechin equivalents; TE, Trolox equivalents.

a,b,c,d,e Mean values with unlike superscript letters were significantly different in the respective assays (P < 0·05).

Roasting led to a 40–50 % decrease in the TPC, and a 30–40 % decrease in the TFC of both genotypes, Nura and Rossa. On the other hand, roasting only reduced the TPC and TFC of TF(Ic*As)*483/13 by 13 and 7 %, respectively. These results support earlier findings that heating applied through various cooking methods decreased the phenolic contents in different types of legumes(Reference Ranilla, Genovese and Lajolo42).

The antioxidant capacities of faba beans were evaluated using three assays: DPPH, TEAC and ORAC (Table 1). The antioxidant capacities of Nura and Rossa were comparable in all assays. However, the antioxidant capacity of TF(Ic*As)*483/13 was lower than the antioxidant capacities of the other two genotypes; about two to three times (ORAC and TEAC assays, respectively) and six times lower (DPPH assay). A significant decrease in the antioxidant capacity of Rossa and Nura occurred after roasting. However, roasting did not affect the antioxidant activity of TF(Ic*As)*483/13 significantly as tested by the DPPH and ORAC assays.

A high correlation was observed for the TPC with TFC (0·98, P < 0·001) and the antioxidant capacities, as evaluated using DPPH (0·93, P < 0·01), TEAC (0·96, P < 0·01) and ORAC (0·87, P < 0·05) assays. The HPLC-post column derivatisation profiles of crude extracts detectable at 280 nm from the raw beans of three genotypes (Fig. 1) showed that the phenolic compounds eluted in two separate regions, which can be arbitrarily classified as relatively polar (0–15 min) and less polar (15–40 min) regions. The HPLC-post column derivatisation results also showed that most of the antioxidant activities in Rossa and Nura were contributed by the less polar region. Distinct active peaks in the less polar region were observed in the HPLC chromatograms of Nura (Fig. 1(A)) and Rossa (Fig. 1(B)). Moreover, traces of anthocyanins were also detected (520 nm, data not presented) in the extract from Rossa, which may contribute to the antioxidant capacity. In contrary, the HPLC chromatogram of the extract from TF(Ic*As)*483/13 (Fig. 1(C)) lacked active compounds in the relatively less polar region. However, the three genotypes appeared to have similar HPLC-post column derivatisation profiles in the relatively polar region.

Fig. 1 Chromatograms of HPLC and on-line post column derivatisation (PCD) assay of crude extracts obtained from the raw faba bean genotypes: (A) Nura, (B) Rossa and (C) TF(Ic*As)*483/13.

Faba beans with coloured seed coat were reported to contain low and high molecular weight phenolic compounds such as flavanols and proanthocyanidins(Reference Borowska, Giczewska and Zadernowski18). The high molecular weight compounds were likely to appear at the relatively less polar region in the HPLC-post column derivatisation profiles (Fig. 1(A) and (B)) and contribute to the antioxidant capacity. High molecular weight phenolic compounds were reported previously to be very active hydrogen donors, and thereby radical quenchers(Reference Hagerman, Riedl and Jones43). The white-coloured TF(Ic*As)*483/13 contained noticeably lower TPC and TFC, and subsequently exhibited significantly lower antioxidant capacity. The HPLC chromatogram of extract from TF(Ic*As)*483/13 (Fig. 1(C)) showed a lack of active phenolic compounds at the less polar region, which might be the polymeric compounds. The present results confirm earlier findings by Madhujith et al. (Reference Madhujith, Amarowicz and Shahidi29), who also were not able to detect anthocyanidin and procyanidin in the white bean varieties.

Cellular protection by faba bean extracts

Cellular antioxidant activity assay

The CAA assay evaluates antioxidant activity at the cellular level. The final result of this assay depends on uptake, distribution and metabolism of the antioxidant compounds in a live cell. This information cannot be obtained in a reagent-based antioxidant testing. In comparison to animal models, the CAA is a cost-effective and fast way to obtain important information on the efficiency of antioxidants within a cell(Reference Wolfe and Liu40). Extracts from Nura and Rossa were evaluated in this study. No significant difference was found between the CAA of extracts obtained from both genotypes, regardless of heat treatment, as expressed in μmol quercetin equivalent/g dry weight of bean (Table 2). However, half maximal effective concentration (EC50) of the roasted Nura showed a tendency for a higher uptake of extracts than its raw beans. The HPLC chromatogram (Fig. 1) demonstrated compositional differences between the compounds detected at 280 nm in extracts from Nura and Rossa. The ‘hump’ at the less polar region dominated in extracts from both Nura and Rossa could be the polymeric compounds, while phenolic acids and flavonols were greater in the extract from Rossa (data not presented). A variety of phenolic compositions were likely to contribute to the different cell uptake rates and efficiency of protection against peroxyl radicals, within an hour. It can also be speculated that heat application during roasting of faba beans caused a partial oxidation of polymeric compounds which would affect the uptake and reflect on the antioxidant capacity within a cell. The CAA EC50 values of the faba beans are slightly lower than those of lentil (670 μg/ml), yellow pea (780 μg/ml) and green peas (1280 μg/ml) as reported in Xu & Chang(Reference Xu and Chang44) assayed using AGS cells.

Table 2 Cellular antioxidant activity of the crude extracts obtained from the raw and roasted faba bean genotypes, Nura and Rossa

(Mean values and standard deviations of three independent experiments, n 3)

μmol QE/g DW, μmol quercetin equivalents per g of bean (dry weight basis); EC50, half maximal effective concentration.

a Mean values with same superscript letters were not significantly different.

* Concentration of the lyophilised extract in the culture medium (μg/ml) able to scavenge 50 % of free radicals effectively within a cell.

Cellular protection against H2O2

H2O2 is a reactive oxygen species which is present in live cells and is used in experimental models. In this experimental model, we evaluated the protective effect of the faba bean extracts against H2O2-induced apoptosis in RAW264.7 cells (Fig. 2). Extracts obtained from the raw faba bean genotypes, Nura and Rossa, were applied at concentrations of 0·1–0·4 mg/ml, and exhibited cellular protection against H2O2 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2(A) and (C)). However, the protection diminished at concentrations higher than 0·4 mg/ml due to the commencement of antiproliferative effects, or possibly due to the pro-oxidative effects of phenolic compounds at high concentrations. The pro-oxidative effect might be caused by the interaction of the added phenolic compounds with undefined components from the culture media, resulting in the generation of H2O2(Reference Lapidot, Walker and Kanner45). The same tendency was observed for extracts obtained from the roasted Nura (Fig. 2(B)). On the other hand, the protective effects by extracts obtained from the roasted Nura and Rossa were observed at concentrations at 0·2 and 0·6 mg/ml, respectively (Fig. 2(B) and (D)). In comparison to other results on the protection of RAW264.7 cells from H2O2-induced injury, the faba bean extracts appeared less efficient than that of Kakadu plum extract(Reference Tan, Konczak and Ramzan39). However, the crude faba bean extracts were used for this study, whereas purified and concentrated Kakadu plum extracts (using XAD-7 resin column) were used. Chow et al. (Reference Chow, Shen and Huan46) found that 25 and 50 μm of quercetin (but not rutin and quercitrin) posed potent protection of RAW264.7 cells against H2O2-induced injury.

Fig. 2 Cellular protection against H2O2 (40 mm) on RAW264.7 cells by crude extracts obtained from the (A) raw and (B) roasted Nura; (C) raw and (D) roasted Rossa. Values are means of four replicates, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. a,b,c,d Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

Effects of faba bean extracts on proliferation and apoptosis of cancer cells

The effect of extracts obtained from the raw and roasted faba bean genotypes, Nura and Rossa, on the proliferation of different types of cancer cells including AGS, HT-29, BL13, Hep G2 and one non-transformed cell line, CCD-18Co, is presented in Table 3. The crude faba bean extracts, applied at a concentration range of 0·2–2·0 mg/ml, exhibited a dose-dependent suppression of all of the tested human cancer cell proliferations, while exhibiting negligible proliferation effect on the non-transformed human colon CCD-18Co cells. Extracts from the raw Nura suppressed some proliferation of non-transformed colon cells, CCD-18Co, while the raw Rossa did not (Fig. 3(A)). Extracts from raw beans of both genotypes effectively suppressed proliferation of the human colon cancer cells, HT-29 (Fig. 3(B)). On the other hand, extracts from the roasted Nura and Rossa did not affect the proliferation of the non-transformed CCD-18Co cells (Fig. 4(A)), but effectively suppressed the proliferation of the human colon cancer cells, HT-29 (Fig. 4(B)).

Table 3 Effects of faba bean crude extracts on the proliferation of human cancer cells: AGS, BL13, Hep G2 and non-transformed cells: CCD-18 Co

(Mean values and standard deviations)

IC50, half maximal inhibitory concentration.

* Results were presented as concentration (mg/ml) of crude extracts in the culture medium needed to achieve suppression of cell growth by 50 % (IC50). Sample concentration ranged from 0·2 to 2·0 mg/ml. The results were obtained via nonlinear regression and based on at least four replicates.

Fig. 3 The effect of crude extracts obtained from the raw faba bean genotypes, Nura () and Rossa () on proliferation of (A) non-transformed human colon cells, CCD-18Co and (B) human colon cancer cells, HT-29. Values are means of at least three independent experiments with four replicates, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars, n 4.

Fig. 4 The effect of crude extracts obtained from the roasted faba bean genotypes, Nura () and Rossa () on proliferation of (A) non-transformed human colon cells, CCD-18Co and (B) human colon cancer cells, HT-29. Values are means of at least three independent experiments with four replicates, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars, n 4.

Heating appeared to cause decreases in phenolic contents and antioxidant capacities, which were in line with some but not all of the antiproliferation results. This suggests that different types of phenolic compounds in the faba bean extracts might exert a diverse degree of activities on specific target sites of cells. The IC50 value represents the concentration required to inhibit 50 % of cell proliferation, and therefore, a lower IC50 indicates a greater antiproliferation ability. The IC50 values of extract from the raw Nura ( < 0·2 mg/ml) and Rossa (1·04 mg/ml) were lower than green pea (3·25 mg/ml), chickpea (3·23 mg/ml) and lentil (1·27 mg/ml) as tested on AGS cells(Reference Xu and Chang44). Seeram et al. (Reference Seeram, Adams and Hardy47) found that different cancer cell lines had diverse levels of sensitivity to phenolic compounds extracted from cranberries using different cell viability testing assays. Extracts from the raw Nura posed exceptionally high antiproliferative effects on AGS and Hep G2 cells in comparison to the raw Rossa. The reason is not known and the results are under further investigation. However, in support of our findings, the IC50 values of six types of berry extracts tested on six different human tumour cell lines were all reported to be less than 0·2 mg/ml(Reference Seeram, Adams and Zhang48).

In order to understand the mechanism behind the suppression of cancer cell proliferation, an investigation to identify apoptotic and necrotic cells within the populations treated by the faba bean extracts was carried out. Apoptosis is a natural cell death process which cancer cells evade. Induction of apoptosis in cancer cells is the preferred way to remove them from the human body, which is an approach used in chemotherapy treatments(Reference Fulda and Debatin49). Food compounds that are able to induce apoptosis of cancer cells might contribute to cancer prevention.

The flow cytometric analysis revealed that exposure of HL-60 (human promyelocytic leukaemia cells) to crude extracts obtained from the raw and roasted faba bean genotypes, Nura and Rossa, induced cell apoptosis (Fig. 5). The percentage of apoptotic cells increased with greater extract concentrations (Fig. 5(A)). After the first 3 h of incubation, early apoptotic events were detected. The number of apoptotic cells increased over the treatment time (Fig. 5(B)), with the greatest percentage of apoptotic cells induced by both, the raw and roasted faba bean extracts, over 24 h. In addition, the percentage of necrotic cells remained very low. This result suggests that the suppression of cancer cell proliferation was due to induction of apoptosis by the applied faba bean extracts.

Fig. 5 Apoptosis of human leukaemia cells, HL-60, induced by crude extracts obtained from the raw and roasted faba beans as determined by flow cytometric analysis based on (A) different dose–response and (B) time course (extract concentration: 0·8 mg/mL). Values are means of three independent flow cytometric analysis for 3000–10 000 cells in each population and presented as a percentage of each cell population, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars, n 3. , Necrotic cells; , late apoptotic cells; , early apoptotic cells; , viable cells.

Inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme, α-glucosidase and lipase

ACE is a key blood pressure regulator which is responsible for vasoconstriction that leads to an increase in blood pressure. Inhibition of ACE activity can potentially prevent ACE from elevating blood pressure, reducing the incidence of hypertension. The enzymes, α-glucosidase and lipase are important enzymes in the digestive tract and are responsible for sugar and lipid digestion, respectively. Inhibition of α-glucosidase activity could potentially reduce starch digestion and sugar absorption, therefore contributing to a lower postprandial hyperglycaemic response, whereas the inhibition of lipase activity could reduce fat uptake contributing to weight maintenance.

The raw and roasted faba bean extracts inhibited the activity of all the investigated enzymes. Condensed tannins (proanthocyanidins) in faba beans are prone to forming complexes with proteins(Reference Naczk, Amarowicz and Zadernowski50). Therefore, the observed inhibition of the various enzymes investigated in the present study is probably due to the formation of proanthocyanidin–enzyme complexes(Reference Zadernowski, Borowska and Naczk51).

Extracts from Nura exhibited the greatest ACE inhibition activity in both of the raw and roasted beans, followed by extracts from Rossa and TF(Ic*As)*483/13 (Fig. 6). Unfortunately, roasting reduced ACE inhibition activity in the faba beans significantly, except for TF(Ic*As)*483/13.

Fig. 6 Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition by crude extracts obtained from the raw () and roasted () faba bean genotypes. Results were expressed as μg of captopril equivalents/g of dry weight of beans. Values are means, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars, n 3. a,b,c,d Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

Roasting was found to decrease the level of α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of all the investigated genotypes (Table 4). Among extracts obtained from both of the raw and roasted beans, Rossa exhibited the highest α-glucosidase inhibition activity, followed by Nura and TF(Ic*As)*483/13. Similar decreases of α-glucosidase inhibitory activities after thermal processing in most of the coloured bean genotypes were also reported by Ranilla et al. (Reference Ranilla, Kwon and Genevese8).

Table 4 Effects of roasting on the α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of faba bean crude extracts

(Mean values and standard deviations, n 3)

* Relative α-glucosidase inhibition activities of crude extracts from the raw and roasted faba bean genotypes. Results were based on the averages of three determinations. The concentrations of the samples (including the reference sample) used were set at 2 mg/ml.

Extracts from Rossa exhibited the strongest lipase inhibitory activity followed by Nura and TF(Ic*As)*483/13 (Table 5). In contrary to the results of roasting effect on the other types of enzymes, heating was found to cause an increase in lipase inhibitory activity in all faba bean genotypes. Similar to the present results, Zadernowski et al. (Reference Zadernowski, Borowska and Naczk51) also reported lipase inhibition activity in both faba bean and pea varieties.

Table 5 Half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) and relative lipase inhibitory activity of crude extracts from the raw and roasted faba bean genotypes

(Mean values and standard deviations, n 3)

* Relative lipase inhibitory activity of crude extracts from the raw and roasted faba bean genotypes. Results were based on an average of three determinations. The sample concentrations were set at 40 mg/ml.

The final concentration of faba bean crude extracts required to achieve the inhibition of enzymatic activity by 50 % under assay condition.

The Pearson's correlation disclosed that ACE results were positively correlated with the TPC (0·88), TFC (0·83), DPPH radical scavenging activity (0·81) and TEAC (0·81) results (P < 0·05), but not significantly correlated with the ORAC results (0·55, P = 0·26). The data suggest that ACE inhibition of faba bean extracts might be caused by the phenolic compounds. In contrary, the results of α-glucosidase and lipase inhibitory activities did not correlate with the results of other assays. Zhang et al. (Reference Zhang, Li and Hogan52) also found no correlation between the TPC and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity among the extracts of seven raspberry cultivars. This suggests that TPC were not directly related to the α-glucosidase and lipase inhibition activities in faba beans. Ranilla et al. (Reference Ranilla, Kwon and Genevese8) reported positive and negative correlations of the TPC with the α-glucosidase and ACE inhibitions as being 0·24 and − 0·42, respectively, in the different dry bean cultivars. On the other hand, Silva Pinto et al. (Reference Silva Pinto, Kwon and Apostolidis53) and Mai et al. (Reference Mai, Thu and Tien54) who tested Brazilian strawberries and Vietnamese edible plants found positive relationships between the TPC and the α-glucosidase inhibitory activity, respectively. This suggests that the relationship between phenolic compounds and α-glucosidase activity depends on the phenolic compositions and subsequently could be plant-specific.

In fact, the solvent used in this study possibly extracted constituents other than phenolic compounds in faba beans, such as trypsin inhibitors(Reference Helsper, Kolodziej and Hoogendijk55), oligosaccharides(Reference Lattanzio, Bianco and Miccolis56), vicine and convicine(Reference Brown and Roberts57), lipase(Reference Dundas, Herderson and Eskin58), saponins(Reference Amarowicz, Yoshiki and Pegg59) and particularly phytate which has been reported to have the ability to bind with proteins(Reference Sharma and Sehgal60), and these microconstituents might affect the results of enzyme inhibition assays. The strong bioactivities of faba bean could be a result of synergistic interaction between those constituents.

The phenolic extracts of three faba bean genotypes exhibited significant differences in activities as evaluated using a range of in vitro assays. Therefore, the present study suggests a possible role for plant breeders to select genotypes for specific health functionality. Faba bean flour or fractionated components can be potentially incorporated into new food products as ingredients to impart desirable health benefits. It would be useful to determine the actual faba bean (or ingredient) intake required to have significant desirable health-promoting effects. However, the actual bioavailability of the phenolic compounds (especially proanthocyanidins) to humans remains unclear(Reference Deprez, Mila and Huneau61, Reference Monach, Williamson and Morand62). Therefore, further research is required to (1) identify these native compounds and their metabolic products and (2) examine their effects on the human digestive system (e.g. metabolised by the colonic microflora) through human clinical studies, before drawing a final conclusion on the faba bean polyphenols in relation to human health.

Conclusions

The crude phenolic extracts obtained from the raw and roasted faba beans evaluated in the present study exhibited potential health-benefiting properties, including potent antioxidant activities (based on both reagent- and cell-based assays), chemopreventative effects (through induction of cancer cell apoptosis) and protection against reactive oxygen species, H2O2. In addition, these extracts showed inhibitory effect on ACE, α-glucosidase and lipase as studied using in vitro methods. Faba bean extracts suppressed proliferation of different types of cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner, but posed negligible effect on the CCD-18Co (colon normal) cells particularly after roasting. According to the reagent-based assays, roasting decreased the antioxidant activities of faba bean extracts; however, the roasting effect on cellular and enzymatic assays varied. Overall, Nura (buff-coloured) and Rossa (red-coloured) exhibited comparable functional properties, while TF(Ic*As)*483/13 (white-coloured) contained the lowest level of all tested functional properties. The present study encourages a wider utilisation of faba bean in human diets for its potential health benefits due to their known microconstituents, such as phenolics.

Acknowledgements

Funding for the present study was provided by Food Futures Flagship, CSIRO Food and Nutritional Sciences; Grains Research & Development Corporation (GRDC Research Code GRS166) and EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (an alliance between Charles Sturt University and NSW Department of Primary Industries). The support received from the Charles Sturt University Postgraduate Writing-Up Award Scheme is gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank Jeffrey Paull, Peter Matthews, Eric Armstrong and Gerard O'Connor for providing samples, and Dr Michelle Bull for acquiring sample data using the flow cytometer. The order of authors reflects their relative contributions. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2009), Rome, FAOSTAT data; available athttp://faostat.fao.org (Accessed November 2009).Google Scholar
2Matthews, P & Marcellos, H (2003) Faba bean. Agfact P4.2.7. Agfact (Serial on the Internet). The State of New South Wales, NSW Agriculture; available at http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/field/field-crops/pulses/beans/faba-bean (Accessed November 2010).Google Scholar
3Bouhnik, Y, Flourie, B, D'Agay-Abensour, L, et al. (1997) Administration of transgalacto-oligosaccharides increases fecal bifidobacteria and modifies colonic fermentation metabolism in healthy human. J Nutr 127, 444448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Mathers, JC (2002) Pulses and carcinogenesis: potential for the prevention of colon, breast and other cancers. Br J Nutr 88, 273279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Campos-Vega, R, Loarca-Piña, G & Oomah, BD (2010) Minor components of pulses and their potential impact on human health. Food Res Int 43, 461482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Aune, D, De Stefani, E, Ronco, A, et al. (2009) Legume intake and the risk of cancer: a multisite case–control study in Uruguay. Cancer Causes Control 20, 16051615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Anderson, JW & Major, AW (2002) Pulses and lipaemia, short- and long-term effect: potential in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Br J Nutr 88, 263271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Ranilla, LG, Kwon, YI, Genevese, MI, et al. (2010) Effect of thermal treatment on phenolic compounds and functionality linked to type 2 diabetes and hypertension management of Peruvian and Brazilian bean cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) using in vitro methods. J Food Biochem 34, 329355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Ferguson, LR (2001) Role of plant polyphenols in genomic stability. Mutat Res 475, 89111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Gomez, M, Oliete, B, Rosell, CM, et al. (2008) Studies on cake quality made of wheat-chickpea flour blends. LWT – Food Sci Technol 41, 17011709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Patterson, CA, Maskus, H & Bassett, CMC (2010) Fortifying foods with pulses. Cereal Foods World 55, 5662.Google Scholar
12Alonso, R, Aguirre, A & Marzo, F (2000) Effects of extrusion and traditional processing methods on antinutrients and in vitro digestibility of protein and starch in faba and kidney beans. Food Chem 68, 159165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Khalil, AH & Mansour, EH (1995) The effect of cooking, autoclaving and germination on the nutritional quality of faba beans. Food Chem 54, 177182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Acar, O, Gokmen, V, Pellegrini, N, et al. (2009) Direct evaluation of the total antioxidant capacity of raw and roasted pulses, nuts and seeds. Eur Food Res Technol 229, 961969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Anderson, JC, Idowu, AO, Singh, U, et al. (1994) Physicochemical characteristics of flours of faba bean as influenced by processing methods. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 45, 371379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Merghem, R, Jay, M, Brun, N, et al. (2004) Qualitative analysis and HPLC isolation and identification of procyanidins from Vicia faba. Phytochem Anal 15, 9599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Helsper, JPFG, Kolodzieg, H, Hoogendijk, JM, et al. (1993) Antinutritional factors in faba beans (Vica faba L.) as affected by breeding toward the absence of condensed tannins. J Agric Food Chem 41, 10581061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Borowska, J, Giczewska, A & Zadernowski, R (2003) Nutritional value of broad bean seeds. Part 2: selected biologically active components. Nahrung-Food 47, 98101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Arts, ICW, van de Putte, B & Hollman, PCH (2000) Catechin contents of foods commonly consumed in the Netherlands. 1. Fruits, vegetables, staple foods, and processed foods. J Agric Food Chem 48, 17461751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Hertog, MGL, Hollman, PCH & Katan, MB (1992) Content of potentially anticarcinogenic flavonoids of 28 vegetables and 9 fruits commonly consumed in the Netherlands. J Agric Food Chem 40, 23792383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Kaufman, PB, Duke, JA, Brielmann, H, et al. (1997) A comparative survey of leguminous plants as sources of the isoflavones, genistein and daidzein: implications for human nutrition and health. J Altern Complement Med 3, 712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Sosulski, FW & Dabrowski, KJ (1984) Composition of free and hydrolyzable phenolic acids in the flours and hulls of ten legume species. J Agric Food Chem 32, 131133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Moneam, NMA (1990) Effects of presoaking on faba bean enzyme inhibitors and polyphenols after cooking. J Agric Food Chem 38, 14791482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Bekkara, F, Jay, M, Viricel, MR, et al. (1998) Distribution of phenolic compounds within seed and seedlings of two Vicia faba cvs differing in their seed tannin content, and study of their seed and root phenolic exudations. Plant Soil 203, 2736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Karamac, M, Kosinska, A, Rybarczyk, A, et al. (2005) Extraction and chromatograhic separation of tannin fractions from tannin-rich plant material. Pol J Food Nutr Sci 57, 471474.Google Scholar
26Amarowicz, R, Troszynska, A, Bary Ko-Pikielna, N, et al. (2004) Polyphenolics extracts from legume seeds: correlations between total antioxidant activity, total phenolics content, tannins content and astringency. J Food Lipids 11, 278286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Ikarashi, N, Takeda, R, Ito, K, et al. (2011) The inhibition of lipase and glucosidase activities by acacia polyphenol. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2011, 272075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Shimura, S, Tsuzuki, W, Kobayashi, S, et al. (1992) Inhibitory effect on lipase activity of extracts from medicinal herbs. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 56, 14781479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Madhujith, T, Amarowicz, R & Shahidi, F (2004) Phenolic antioxidants in beans and their effects on inhibition of radical-induced DNA damage. J Am Oil Chem Soc 81, 691696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30de Mejía, EG, Castaño-Tostado, E & Loarca-Piña, G (1999) Antimutagenic effects of natural phenolic compounds in beans. Mutat Res 441, 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Itoh, T, Umekawa, H & Furuichi, Y (2005) Potential ability of hot water adzuki (Vigna angularis) extracts to inhibit the adhesion, invasion, and metastasis of murine B16 melanoma cells. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 69, 448454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Amarowicz, R, Karamac, M, Kmita-Glazewska, H, et al. (1996) Antioxidant activity of phenolic fractions of everlasting pea, faba bean and broad bean. J Food Lipids 3, 199211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Kalogeropoulos, N, Chiou, A, Ioannou, M, et al. (2010) Nutritional evaluation and bioactive microconstituents (phytosterols, tocopherols, polyphenols, triterpenic acids) in cooked dry legumes usually consumed in the Mediterranean countries. Food Chem 121, 682690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Konczak, I, Zabaras, D, Dunstan, M, et al. (2010) Antioxidant capacity and phenolic compounds in commercially grown native Australian herbs and species. Food Chem 122, 260266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35Michalska, A, Ceglinska, A, Amarowicz, R, et al. (2007) Antioxidant contents and antioxidative properties of traditional rye breads. J Agric Food Chem 55, 734740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36Prior, RL, Hoang, H, Gu, L, et al. (2003) Assays for hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidant capacity (oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORACFL)) of plasma and other biological and food samples. J Agric Food Chem 51, 32733279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37Ee, KY, Agboola, S, Rehman, A, et al. (2011) Characterisation of phenolic components present in raw and roasted wattle (Acacia victoriae Bentham) seed. Food Chem 129, 816821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Brookes, DE, Zandvliet, D, Watt, F, et al. (1998) Relative activity and specificity of promoters from prostate-expressed genes. Prostate 35, 1826.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39Tan, AC, Konczak, I, Ramzan, I, et al. (2011) Antioxidant and cytoprotective activities of native Australian fruit polyphenols. Food Res Int 44, 20342040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Wolfe, KL & Liu, RH (2007) Cellular antioxidant activity (CAA) assay for assessing antioxidants, foods, and dietary supplements. J Agric Food Chem 55, 88968907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41Shalaby, SM, Zakora, M & Otte, J (2006) Performance of two commonly used angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition assays using FA-PGG and HHL as substrates. J Dairy Res 73, 178186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Ranilla, LGl, Genovese, MI & Lajolo, FM (2009) Effect of different cooking conditions on phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of some selected Brazilian bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars. J Agric Food Chem 57, 57345742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43Hagerman, AE, Riedl, KM, Jones, GA, et al. (1998) High molecular weight plant polyphenolics (tannins) as biological antioxidants. J Agric Food Chem 46, 18871892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Xu, B & Chang, SKC (2009) Phytochemical profiles and health-promoting effects of cool-season food legumes as influenced by thermal processing. J Agric Food Chem 57, 1071810731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45Lapidot, T, Walker, MD & Kanner, J (2002) Antioxidant and prooxidant effects of phenolics on pancreatic β-cells in vitro. J Agric Food Chem 50, 72207225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46Chow, J-M, Shen, S-C, Huan, SK, et al. (2005) Quercetin, but not rutin and quercitrin, prevention of H2O2-induced apoptosis via anti-oxidant activity and heme oxygenase 1 gene expression in macrophages. Biochem Pharmacol 69, 18391851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47Seeram, NP, Adams, LS, Hardy, ML, et al. (2004) Total cranberry extract versus its phytochemical constituents: antiproliferative and synergistic effects against human tumor cell lines. J Agric Food Chem 52, 25122517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48Seeram, NP, Adams, LS, Zhang, Y, et al. (2006) Blackberry, black raspberry, blueberry, cranberry, red raspberry, and strawberry extracts inhibit growth and stimulate apoptosis of human cancer cells in vitro. J Agric Food Chem 54, 93299339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49Fulda, S & Debatin, K-M (2006) Extrinsic versus intrinsic apoptosis pathways in anticancer chemotherapy. Oncogene 25, 47984811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50Naczk, M, Amarowicz, R, Zadernowski, R, et al. (2001) Protein precipitating capacity of condensed tannins of beach pea, canola hulls, evening primrose and faba bean. Food Chem 73, 467471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51Zadernowski, R, Borowska, J, Naczk, M, et al. (2001) Effect of broad bean and pea phenolics on the activity of lipase and lipoxygenase. J Food Lipids 8, 263270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52Zhang, L, Li, J, Hogan, S, et al. (2010) Inhibitory effect of rasberries on starch digestive enzyme and their antioxidant properties and phenolic composition. Food Chem 119, 592599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53Silva Pinto, M, Kwon, Y-I, Apostolidis, E, et al. (2008) Functionality of bioactive compounds in Brazilian strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cultivars: evaluation of hyperglycemia and hypertension potential using in vitro models. J Agric Food Chem 56, 43864392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54Mai, TT, Thu, NN, Tien, PG, et al. (2006) Alpha-glucosidase inhibitory and antioxidant activities of vietnamese edible plants and their relationships with polyphenol contents. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol 53, 267276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55Helsper, JPFG, Kolodziej, H, Hoogendijk, JM, et al. (1993) Characterization and trypsin inhibitor activity of proanthocyanidins from Vicia faba. Phytochem 34, 12551260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56Lattanzio, V, Bianco, VV, Miccolis, V, et al. (1986) Mono- and oligosaccharides in fifteen Vicia faba L. cultivars. Food Chem 22, 1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57Brown, EG & Roberts, FM (1972) Formation of vicine and convicine by Vicia faba. Phytochem 11, 32033206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58Dundas, DGA, Herderson, HM & Eskin, NAM (1978) Lipase from Vicia faba minor. Food Chem 3, 171178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59Amarowicz, Y, Yoshiki, Y, Pegg, RB, et al. (1997) Presence of two saponins in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) seeds. Nahrung 41, 352354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60Sharma, A & Sehgal, S (1992) Effect of processing and cooking on the antinutritional factors of faba bean (Vicia faba). Food Chem 43, 383385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61Deprez, S, Mila, I, Huneau, J-F, et al. (2001) Transport of proanthocyanidin dimer, trimer, and polymer across monolayers of human intestinal epithelial Caco-2 cells. Antioxid Redox Signal 3, 957967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62Monach, C, Williamson, G, Morand, C, et al. (2005) Bioavailability and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. I. Review of 97 bioavailability studies. Am J Clin Nutr 81, 230242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Extraction yield, total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity, Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) and oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) of crude extracts from the raw and roasted faba bean genotypes(Mean values and standard deviations of at least three independent measurements, n 3)

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Chromatograms of HPLC and on-line post column derivatisation (PCD) assay of crude extracts obtained from the raw faba bean genotypes: (A) Nura, (B) Rossa and (C) TF(Ic*As)*483/13.

Figure 2

Table 2 Cellular antioxidant activity of the crude extracts obtained from the raw and roasted faba bean genotypes, Nura and Rossa(Mean values and standard deviations of three independent experiments, n 3)

Figure 3

Fig. 2 Cellular protection against H2O2 (40 mm) on RAW264.7 cells by crude extracts obtained from the (A) raw and (B) roasted Nura; (C) raw and (D) roasted Rossa. Values are means of four replicates, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. a,b,c,d Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

Figure 4

Table 3 Effects of faba bean crude extracts on the proliferation of human cancer cells: AGS, BL13, Hep G2 and non-transformed cells: CCD-18 Co(Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 5

Fig. 3 The effect of crude extracts obtained from the raw faba bean genotypes, Nura () and Rossa () on proliferation of (A) non-transformed human colon cells, CCD-18Co and (B) human colon cancer cells, HT-29. Values are means of at least three independent experiments with four replicates, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars, n 4.

Figure 6

Fig. 4 The effect of crude extracts obtained from the roasted faba bean genotypes, Nura () and Rossa () on proliferation of (A) non-transformed human colon cells, CCD-18Co and (B) human colon cancer cells, HT-29. Values are means of at least three independent experiments with four replicates, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars, n 4.

Figure 7

Fig. 5 Apoptosis of human leukaemia cells, HL-60, induced by crude extracts obtained from the raw and roasted faba beans as determined by flow cytometric analysis based on (A) different dose–response and (B) time course (extract concentration: 0·8 mg/mL). Values are means of three independent flow cytometric analysis for 3000–10 000 cells in each population and presented as a percentage of each cell population, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars, n 3. , Necrotic cells; , late apoptotic cells; , early apoptotic cells; , viable cells.

Figure 8

Fig. 6 Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition by crude extracts obtained from the raw () and roasted () faba bean genotypes. Results were expressed as μg of captopril equivalents/g of dry weight of beans. Values are means, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars, n 3. a,b,c,d Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

Figure 9

Table 4 Effects of roasting on the α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of faba bean crude extracts(Mean values and standard deviations, n 3)

Figure 10

Table 5 Half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) and relative lipase inhibitory activity of crude extracts from the raw and roasted faba bean genotypes(Mean values and standard deviations, n 3)