World Trade Review

Review Article

Welfare costs and benefits of non-tariff measures in trade: a conceptual framework and application

JOHN BEGHINa1, ANNE-CÉLIA DISDIERa2, STÉPHAN MARETTEa3 and FRANK VAN TONGERENa4 c1

a1 Iowa State University and INRA, UMR Economie Publique INRA-AgroParisTech

a2 Paris School of Economics, INRA UMR PSE

a3 INRA, UMR Economie Publique INRA-AgroParisTech

a4 OECD, Trade and Agriculture Directorate

Abstract

This paper provides a systematic welfare-based approach to analyze the impact of non-tariff measures (NTMs) on trade and welfare in the presence of market imperfections. It focuses on standard-like measures such as technical barriers and sanitary and phytosanitary regulations. The approach overcomes the shortcomings of the mainstream approach based on the analysis of foregone trade caused by trade costs. The latter ignores market imperfections, and welfare is found to increases when NTMs are reduced and trade expands. We explain how to account for external effects and market failures in trade-focused welfare analysis, leading to a more balanced overall assessment of measures despite a potential reduction of trade flows. The relationships between trade, welfare, and NTMs are complex, and generalizations are best avoided. Very often, the optimum NTM is not the absence of regulation. An application to shrimp trade illustrates the feasibility of the proposed approach. The illustration shows that the reinforcement of a food safety standard can be socially preferable to the status-quo situation, both domestically and internationally.

Correspondence:

c1 Email: frank.vantongeren@oecd.org.

Footnotes

Senior authorship is shared. We thank participants at IATRC 2009 Winter Meetings for helpful comments and discussions, and two referees for their comments on an earlier draft. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the OECD or the governments of its member countries.